• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纽约和威斯康星州职业安全与健康管理局大型乳制品行业地方重点项目概述及影响评估。

An overview and impact assessment of OSHA large dairy local emphasis programs in New York and Wisconsin.

作者信息

Liebman Amy, Franko Eileen, Reyes Iris, Keifer Matthew, Sorensen Julie

机构信息

Migrant Clinicians Network, Salisbury, Maryland.

Division of Safety and Health, New York State Department of Labor, Albany, New York.

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 2018 Jun 21. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22868.

DOI:10.1002/ajim.22868
PMID:29926466
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Farming has been exempted from most labor regulations and shielded from regulatory scrutiny by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Yet, agriculture and dairy in particular, has relatively high injury and fatality rates.

METHODS

A recent shift in OSHA's approach to agricultural worker safety and health includes two dairy-focused Local Emphasis Programs (LEPs), one launched in Wisconsin in 2011 and the other in New York in 2014. We examine data from LEP-related, OSHA consultations and inspections as well as non-governmental audit programs, and review farmer perceptions about the LEP.

RESULTS

Inspections conducted by OSHA and private consultation programs highlight the presence and variety of hazards on dairy farms in Wisconsin and New York.

CONCLUSION

The LEPs helped raise dairy producers' awareness of inherent hazards and methods to correct them. Farmers cited the LEP as beneficial, identifying it as a catalyst to reduce hazards on their farms.

摘要

背景

农业已被豁免于大多数劳动法规,并免受职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)的监管审查。然而,尤其是农业和乳制品行业,其受伤率和死亡率相对较高。

方法

OSHA处理农业工人安全与健康问题的方法最近有所转变,包括两个以乳制品为重点的地方重点项目(LEP),一个于2011年在威斯康星州启动,另一个于2014年在纽约启动。我们研究了与LEP相关的OSHA咨询和检查以及非政府审计项目的数据,并审查了农民对LEP的看法。

结果

OSHA和私人咨询项目进行的检查突出了威斯康星州和纽约州奶牛场存在的各种危害。

结论

这些地方重点项目有助于提高乳制品生产商对固有危害及其纠正方法的认识。农民们认为这些项目有益,并将其视为减少农场危害的催化剂。

相似文献

1
An overview and impact assessment of OSHA large dairy local emphasis programs in New York and Wisconsin.纽约和威斯康星州职业安全与健康管理局大型乳制品行业地方重点项目概述及影响评估。
Am J Ind Med. 2018 Jun 21. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22868.
2
Impact of preparing for OSHA local emphasis program inspections of New York dairy farms: Case studies and financial cost analysis.纽约奶牛场职业安全与健康管理局地方重点项目检查准备工作的影响:案例研究与财务成本分析
Am J Ind Med. 2016 Mar;59(3):245-55. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22546. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
3
Assisting New York Dairy Farms with Preparing for OSHA Safety Inspections.协助纽约奶牛场准备职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)的安全检查。
J Agromedicine. 2018;23(1):20-24. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2017.1384774.
4
Evaluation of the characteristics of workers injured on the job requiring hospitalization, and employer compliance with OSHA's reporting requirement for these work-related hospitalizations.评估因工住院治疗的受伤工人的特征,以及雇主遵守 OSHA 对这些与工作相关的住院治疗报告要求的情况。
Am J Ind Med. 2023 Feb;66(2):109-121. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23447. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
5
Fatal injuries to teenage construction workers in the US.美国青少年建筑工人的致命伤。
Am J Ind Med. 2003 Nov;44(5):510-4. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10304.
6
Occupational chemical exposures: a collaboration between the Georgia Poison Center and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.职业性化学物质暴露:佐治亚中毒控制中心与职业安全与健康管理局的合作项目
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2018 Jan;56(1):55-62. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2017.1338718. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
7
Does multifunctionality matter to US farmers? Farmer motivations and conceptions of multifunctionality in dairy systems.多功能性对美国农民重要吗?奶业系统中农民对多功能性的动机及概念理解
J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:451-462. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.034. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
8
Use of OSHA inspections data for fatal occupational injury surveillance in New Jersey.利用职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)的检查数据进行新泽西州致命职业伤害监测。
Am J Public Health. 1990 Feb;80(2):200-2. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.2.200.
9
An analysis of violations of Osha's (1987) occupational exposure to benzene standard.对违反 Osha(1987)职业性苯暴露标准的分析。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2014;17(5):259-83. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2014.924452.
10
Assessing the accuracy of OSHA's projections of the benefits of new safety standards.评估职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)对新安全标准效益预测的准确性。
Am J Ind Med. 2004 Apr;45(4):313-28. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10362.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives of dairy employees at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of health risks and educational needs.新冠疫情初期乳制品行业员工的观点:一项关于健康风险和教育需求的调查
JDS Commun. 2023 May;4(3):186-190. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2022-0253. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
2
Occupational Injuries among Latino/a Immigrant Cattle Feedyard Workers in the Central States Region of the United States.美国中陆地区拉丁裔移民牲畜饲养场工人的职业伤害。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 21;18(16):8821. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168821.
3
Precarious Essential Work, Immigrant Dairy Farmworkers, and Occupational Health Experiences in Vermont.
不稳定的必要工作、移民奶农和佛蒙特州的职业健康体验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;18(7):3675. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073675.
4
Recent Research on Occupational Animal Exposures and Health Risks: A Narrative Review.近期职业性动物接触与健康风险研究述评。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2019 Dec;6(4):236-246. doi: 10.1007/s40572-019-00253-5.