Department of Oral Biology, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Rutgers University - Newark, NJ, USA.
Department of Periodontology, Academic Center of Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S95-S111. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12942.
Since the initial description of aggressive periodontitis (AgP) in the early 1900s, classification of this disease has been in flux. The goal of this manuscript is to review the existing literature and to revisit definitions and diagnostic criteria for AgP.
An extensive literature search was performed that included databases from PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, Scopus and Web of Science. Of 4930 articles reviewed, 4737 were eliminated. Criteria for elimination included; age > 30 years old, abstracts, review articles, absence of controls, fewer than; a) 200 subjects for genetic studies, and b) 20 subjects for other studies. Studies satisfying the entrance criteria were included in tables developed for AgP (localized and generalized), in areas related to epidemiology, microbial, host and genetic analyses. The highest rank was given to studies that were; a) case controlled or cohort, b) assessed at more than one time-point, c) assessed for more than one factor (microbial or host), and at multiple sites.
Epidemiologic studies provided insight into ethnic and societal factors affecting AgP. DNA analysis of microbes showed some consistency but significant variability. Host factor analysis was less consistent. Many genetic studies were conducted but few had either sufficient power or looked at multiple genes in AgP.
Conflicting data resulted for several reasons; 1) the classification was too broad, 2) the disease (AgP) was not studied from its inception, at differing time points (temporal), and at different locations (topographic). New technologic advances coupled with a more delimiting definition of disease will allow for genetic, host and microbial factor analyses in an unbiased manner. As such we predict that progress can be made in identifying a robust group of genetic, host, and microbial risk-markers associated with periodontal disease that can improve diagnostic capability in disease associated with juveniles, adolescents, and post-adolescent individuals.
自 20 世纪初首次描述侵袭性牙周炎(AgP)以来,该疾病的分类一直处于不断变化之中。本文的目的是回顾现有文献,并重新审视 AgP 的定义和诊断标准。
进行了广泛的文献检索,包括来自 PubMed、Medline、Cochrane、Scopus 和 Web of Science 的数据库。在审查的 4930 篇文章中,有 4737 篇被排除。排除的标准包括:年龄>30 岁、摘要、综述文章、缺乏对照、少于;a)遗传研究 200 例,b)其他研究 20 例。符合入选标准的研究被纳入为 AgP(局部和广泛)、流行病学、微生物、宿主和遗传分析相关领域制定的表格中。最高等级给予以下研究:a)病例对照或队列,b)在多个时间点评估,c)评估超过一个因素(微生物或宿主),并在多个部位评估。
流行病学研究提供了影响 AgP 的种族和社会因素的见解。微生物 DNA 分析显示出一些一致性,但存在很大的可变性。宿主因素分析则不太一致。进行了许多遗传研究,但很少有研究具有足够的效力或在 AgP 中研究多个基因。
由于以下几个原因,出现了相互矛盾的数据:1)分类过于宽泛,2)疾病(AgP)不是从一开始就在不同时间点(时间)和不同地点(地形)进行研究的。新技术的进步加上对疾病的更明确定义,将允许以无偏倚的方式对遗传、宿主和微生物因素进行分析。因此,我们预测可以在确定与牙周病相关的遗传、宿主和微生物风险标志物方面取得进展,从而提高与青少年、青少年和青少年后个体相关疾病的诊断能力。