• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动医疗干预支持进食障碍的系统评价。

A systematic review of mHealth interventions for the support of eating disorders.

机构信息

Department of Information and Communication Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

Open Evidence Research, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2018 Sep;26(5):394-416. doi: 10.1002/erv.2609. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1002/erv.2609
PMID:29927004
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the existing evidence of mobile health (mHealth) tools for the treatment of eating disorders (ED).

METHOD

Electronic databases (Pubmed, PsycInfo, and SCOPUS) were searched, and PRISMA guidelines were followed. Selected studies were divided into three categories according to the intended purpose of the mHealth tools used: (a) sole means of support, (b) complementary to standard face-to-face treatment, and (c) for relapse prevention. Additionally, studies were assessed on efficacy, qualitative information, and methodological quality.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were identified. Most studies using mHealth as a sole means of intervention or adjunct to traditional therapy showed no effects, although an improvement at postassessment was present in vodcast, smartphone application, and text-messaging interventions. Between group effects were only found for a text-messaging intervention for relapse prevention. Qualitative analyses showed that most mHealth interventions were considered as acceptable, supporting, and motivating by patients and therapists, although different important problems were observed in individual studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited effects were found for mHealth interventions to reduce ED-related symptoms. A common evaluation framework for ED mHealth interventions should be proposed to assess the validity of interventions before implementing them on a larger scale in clinical practice.

摘要

目的

系统综述移动医疗(mHealth)工具在治疗饮食失调(ED)中的现有证据。

方法

检索电子数据库(Pubmed、PsycInfo 和 SCOPUS),并遵循 PRISMA 指南。根据使用的 mHealth 工具的预期目的,将选定的研究分为三类:(a)唯一支持手段,(b)补充标准面对面治疗,(c)用于预防复发。此外,还评估了研究的疗效、定性信息和方法学质量。

结果

确定了 15 项研究。尽管视频播客、智能手机应用程序和短信干预措施在评估后显示出改善,但大多数将 mHealth 作为单一干预手段或传统治疗的辅助手段的研究都没有效果。仅在预防复发的短信干预措施中发现了组间效果。定性分析表明,大多数 mHealth 干预措施被患者和治疗师认为是可接受、支持和激励的,尽管在个别研究中观察到了不同的重要问题。

结论

mHealth 干预措施对减少 ED 相关症状的效果有限。应提出针对 ED mHealth 干预措施的通用评估框架,以便在更大规模的临床实践中实施干预措施之前评估其有效性。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of mHealth interventions for the support of eating disorders.移动医疗干预支持进食障碍的系统评价。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2018 Sep;26(5):394-416. doi: 10.1002/erv.2609. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
2
The Use of Mobile Apps and SMS Messaging as Physical and Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review.使用移动应用程序和短信作为身心健康干预措施:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 24;19(8):e295. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7740.
3
Scoping review and evaluation of SMS/text messaging platforms for mHealth projects or clinical interventions.针对移动健康项目或临床干预的短信/文本消息平台的范围审查与评估。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 May;101:28-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.01.017. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
4
The effectiveness of mobile-health behaviour change interventions for cardiovascular disease self-management: A systematic review.移动健康行为改变干预措施对心血管疾病自我管理的有效性:一项系统综述。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 May;23(8):801-17. doi: 10.1177/2047487315613462. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
5
Fundamentals for Future Mobile-Health (mHealth): A Systematic Review of Mobile Phone and Web-Based Text Messaging in Mental Health.未来移动健康(mHealth)的基础:对心理健康领域中手机和基于网络的短信服务的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 10;18(6):e135. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5066.
6
Mobile Phone Interventions for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Systematic Review.青少年性与生殖健康的手机干预措施:一项系统综述
Pediatrics. 2016 Sep;138(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0884. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
7
Review of smartphone applications for the treatment of eating disorders.用于治疗饮食失调症的智能手机应用程序综述。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2015 Jan;23(1):1-11. doi: 10.1002/erv.2327. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
8
A Systematic Review of mHealth-Based Heart Failure Interventions.基于移动健康技术的心力衰竭干预措施的系统评价
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 May-Jun;31(3):E10-22. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000305.
9
The Cost-Effectiveness of Mobile Health (mHealth) Interventions for Older Adults: Systematic Review.移动医疗(mHealth)干预措施对老年人的成本效益:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 22;17(15):5290. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155290.
10
Effectiveness of mobile health (mHealth) interventions for promoting healthy eating in adults: A systematic review.移动健康 (mHealth) 干预措施在促进成年人健康饮食方面的有效性:系统评价。
Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105:156-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.022. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of ChatGPT use on eating disorders and body image.ChatGPT的使用对饮食失调和身体形象的影响。
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 19;15(8):107122. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i8.107122.
2
Medication for bone loss in female patients with anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and management algorithm.神经性厌食症女性患者骨质流失的药物治疗:系统评价与管理算法
Eat Weight Disord. 2025 Aug 4;30(1):60. doi: 10.1007/s40519-025-01758-9.
3
Smartphone-Supported Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Binge-Eating Disorder: An Exploratory Randomized Trial.
智能手机支持的暴食症认知行为疗法:一项探索性随机试验。
Int J Eat Disord. 2025 Sep;58(9):1793-1805. doi: 10.1002/eat.24479. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
4
Developing a digital intervention to combat fatphobia and anti-fat bias.开发一种数字干预措施以对抗体重歧视和反肥胖偏见。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 13;16:1569841. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1569841. eCollection 2025.
5
The hybrid space in eating disorder treatment: towards a personalized approach to integrating telehealth and in-person care.饮食失调治疗中的混合空间:迈向整合远程医疗和面对面护理的个性化方法。
J Eat Disord. 2025 Feb 10;13(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01211-3.
6
User Experiences of and Preferences for Self-Guided Digital Interventions for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Eating Disorders: Systematic Review and Metasynthesis.轻度至中度饮食失调自我引导式数字干预的用户体验与偏好:系统评价与综合分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Jan 3;12:e57795. doi: 10.2196/57795.
7
Understanding Patients' Preferences for a Digital Intervention to Prevent Posttreatment Deterioration for Bulimia-Spectrum Eating Disorders: User-Centered Design Study.理解患者对预防暴食症谱系进食障碍治疗后恶化的数字干预措施的偏好:以用户为中心的设计研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 18;8:e60865. doi: 10.2196/60865.
8
Using patient-generated health data more efficient and effectively to facilitate the implementation of value-based healthcare in the EU - Innovation report.更高效且有效地利用患者生成的健康数据,以促进欧盟基于价值的医疗保健的实施——创新报告。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 Oct 18;24:672-678. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.10.026. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Behavior Change Techniques Within Digital Interventions for the Treatment of Eating Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.用于治疗饮食失调的数字干预中的行为改变技术:系统评价与荟萃分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Aug 1;11:e57577. doi: 10.2196/57577.
10
Burst versus continuous delivery design in digital mental health interventions: Evidence from a randomized clinical trial.数字心理健康干预中的突发式与持续式交付设计:来自一项随机临床试验的证据。
Digit Health. 2024 Apr 30;10:20552076241249267. doi: 10.1177/20552076241249267. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.