Khourdaji Iyad, Zillioux Jacqueline, Eisenfrats Kevin, Foley Daniel, Smith Ryan
Department of Urology, University of Virginia Healthcare System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Contraline, Inc., Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 May;7(Suppl 2):S220-S235. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.03.23.
The continued and rapid expansion of the Earth's population mandates the need for safe and effective measures of contraception. While a plethora of options exist for women, methods of contraception for the male partner are limited to condoms and vasectomy. The sequela of this discrepancy has led to the family planning burden falling disproportionately on the female partner. For the past several decades, extensive research has been undertaken exploring the feasibility of hormonal male contraception. This proposed method of contraception has focused on suppressing spermatogenesis by exploiting the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. Beginning with proof of concept studies in the early nineties, administration of testosterone in healthy male subjects has been shown to be an efficacious method of inducing sterility. Owing to ethnic differences in spermatogenesis suppression and the comparatively low rate of azoospermia in Caucasian men with androgen-only regimens, investigators have explored the addition of progestins to further enhance the efficacy of hormonal contraception. Though studies have revealed promise with androgen-progestin regimens, the lack of long-term studies has precluded the development of a marketable product. Recently, more research has been directed towards identifying non-hormonal alternatives to male contraception. These non-hormonal options have ranged from the development of devices facilitating reversible occlusion of the vas deferens lumen to medications disrupting various pathways in the process of spermatogenesis. Underlying the development of hormonal and non-hormonal strategies is the shared enthusiasm men and women have towards these male directed methods. The willingness of couples to pursue these alternatives combined with the global need to reduce the psychological and socioeconomic implications of unintended pregnancy ensures that research will continue to bring this goal to fruition.
地球人口的持续快速增长,使得采取安全有效的避孕措施成为必要。虽然女性有大量的避孕选择,但男性伴侣的避孕方法仅限于避孕套和输精管切除术。这种差异的后果导致计划生育的负担过度地落在了女性伴侣身上。在过去几十年里,人们进行了广泛的研究,探讨激素男性避孕法的可行性。这种提议的避孕方法专注于通过利用下丘脑-垂体-性腺(HPG)轴来抑制精子发生。从90年代初的概念验证研究开始,在健康男性受试者中使用睾酮已被证明是一种诱导不育的有效方法。由于在精子发生抑制方面存在种族差异,而且仅使用雄激素方案的白人男性无精子症发生率相对较低,研究人员探索添加孕激素以进一步提高激素避孕的效果。尽管研究显示雄激素-孕激素方案有前景,但缺乏长期研究阻碍了可上市产品的开发。最近,更多的研究致力于确定男性避孕的非激素替代方法。这些非激素选择包括开发促进输精管腔可逆性闭塞的装置,以及干扰精子发生过程中各种途径的药物。激素和非激素策略发展的背后,是男性和女性对这些针对男性的方法共同的热情。夫妻双方愿意采用这些替代方法,再加上全球减少意外怀孕的心理和社会经济影响的需求,确保了研究将继续朝着实现这一目标迈进。