• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德国成功跨学科合作项目的潜在基准:一项系统综述]

[Potential Benchmarks for Successful Interdisciplinary Collaboration Projects in Germany: A Systematic Review].

作者信息

Weißenborn Marina, Schulz Martin, Kraft Manuel, Haefeli Walter E, Seidling Hanna M

机构信息

Abteilung Klinische Pharmakologie und Pharmakoepidemiologie, Kooperationseinheit Klinische Pharmazie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg.

ABDA - Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Apothekerverbände e. V., Geschäftsbereich Arzneimittel, Berlin.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2019 Dec;81(12):1057-1068. doi: 10.1055/a-0592-7184. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1055/a-0592-7184
PMID:29929202
Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY

Collaboration between general practitioners and community pharmacists is essential to ensure safe and effective patient care. However, collaboration in primary care is not standardized and varies greatly. This review aims to highlight projects about professional collaboration in ambulatory care in Germany and identifies promising approaches and successful benchmarks that should be considered for future projects.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed based on the PRISMA guidelines to identify articles focusing on professional collaboration between general practitioners and pharmacists.

RESULTS

A total of 542 articles were retrieved. Six potential premises for successful cooperation projects were identified: GP and CP knowing each other (I), involvement of both health care providers in the project planning (II), sharing of experience or concerns during regular joint meetings enabling continuing evaluation and adaption (III), ensuring (technical) feasibility (IV), particularly by providing incentives (V), and by integrating these projects into existing health care structures (VI).

CONCLUSION

Only few studies have been published in scientific journals. There was no standardized assessment of how the participants perceived their collaboration and how it facilitates their daily work, even when the study aimed to evaluate GP-CP collaboration. Successful cooperation between GP and CP in daily routine care was often characterized by personal contact and longtime relationships. Therefore, collaborative teaching sessions at university might establish sympathy and mutual understanding right from the beginning. There is a strong need to establish standardized tools to evaluate collaboration in future projects and to enable comparability of different studies.

摘要

研究目的

全科医生与社区药剂师之间的合作对于确保患者获得安全有效的护理至关重要。然而,初级保健中的合作并未标准化,且差异很大。本综述旨在突出德国门诊护理中专业合作的项目,并确定未来项目应考虑的有前景的方法和成功基准。

方法

根据PRISMA指南进行系统的文献检索,以识别关注全科医生与药剂师之间专业合作的文章。

结果

共检索到542篇文章。确定了成功合作项目的六个潜在前提:全科医生和社区药剂师相互了解(I),双方医疗保健提供者参与项目规划(II),在定期联席会议期间分享经验或问题以进行持续评估和调整(III),确保(技术)可行性(IV),特别是通过提供激励措施(V),以及将这些项目纳入现有的医疗保健结构(VI)。

结论

科学期刊上发表的研究很少。即使研究旨在评估全科医生与社区药剂师的合作,也没有对参与者如何看待他们的合作以及合作如何促进他们的日常工作进行标准化评估。全科医生和社区药剂师在日常护理中的成功合作通常以个人接触和长期关系为特征。因此,大学中的合作教学课程可能从一开始就建立起同情和相互理解。迫切需要建立标准化工具来评估未来项目中的合作,并使不同研究具有可比性。

相似文献

1
[Potential Benchmarks for Successful Interdisciplinary Collaboration Projects in Germany: A Systematic Review].[德国成功跨学科合作项目的潜在基准:一项系统综述]
Gesundheitswesen. 2019 Dec;81(12):1057-1068. doi: 10.1055/a-0592-7184. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
2
Factors influencing interprofessional collaboration between community pharmacists and general practitioners-A systematic review.影响社区药剂师与全科医生之间协作的因素:系统评价。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jul;27(4):e189-e212. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12705. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
3
Physicians and community pharmacists collaboration in primary care: A review of specific models.初级保健中医生与社区药剂师的合作:特定模式综述
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Sep-Oct;11(5):602-22. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
4
Interprofessional communication between community pharmacists and general practitioners: a qualitative study.社区药剂师与全科医生之间的跨专业沟通:一项定性研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Jun;39(3):495-506. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0450-6. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
5
Development and validation of a measure and a model of general practitioner attitudes toward collaboration with pharmacists.开发和验证一般实践医生对与药剂师合作态度的测量工具和模型。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Nov-Dec;9(6):688-99. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
6
Process of translation and cross-cultural adaptation of two Australian instruments to evaluate the physician-pharmacist collaboration in Germany.将两个澳大利亚工具翻译成德文,以评估德国医生-药剂师合作的过程,同时进行跨文化调适。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Jan;16(1):74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
7
[Interprofessional physicians-pharmacists collaboration in ambulatory care : a potential to be exploited].[门诊医疗中跨专业医生与药剂师的合作:一种有待开发的潜力]
Rev Med Suisse. 2019 Oct 30;15(669):1962-1966.
8
Cooperation between community pharmacists and general practitioners in eastern Germany: attitudes and needs.德国东部社区药剂师与全科医生的合作:态度与需求。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Aug;35(4):584-92. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9772-1. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Medication reviews in hospitalized patients: a qualitative study on perceptions of primary and secondary care providers on interprofessional collaboration.住院患者的药物治疗审查:一项关于初级和二级保健提供者对跨专业合作的看法的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):902. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05744-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Fostering collaboration: a controlled pilot study of interprofessional education for medical and pharmacy students.促进合作:一项针对医学和药学专业学生的跨专业教育的对照性试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jun 3;25(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07424-z.
2
Attitudes of non-participating general practitioners and community pharmacists towards interprofessional medication management in primary care: an interview study.非参与的全科医生和社区药剂师对初级保健中跨专业药物管理的态度:一项访谈研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Dec;44(6):1380-1393. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01434-3. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
3
Drug Safety for Nursing-Home Residents-Findings of a Pragmatic, Cluster-Randomized, Controlled Intervention Trialin 44 Nursing Homes.
《养老院居民的药物安全 - 一项在 44 家养老院开展的实用、集群随机、对照干预试验的研究结果》。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Oct 22;118(42):705-712. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0297.
4
Influence of pharmacist intervention on drug safety of geriatric inpatients: a prospective, controlled trial.药剂师干预对老年住院患者用药安全的影响:一项前瞻性对照试验。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2019 Apr 16;10:2042098619843365. doi: 10.1177/2042098619843365. eCollection 2019.