Suppr超能文献

数字流行病学——远程校准读者对牙片的评分。

Digital epidemiology - Calibrating readers to score dental images remotely.

机构信息

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.

University of Manchester Colgate Palmolive Dental Health Unit, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

J Dent. 2018 Jul;74 Suppl 1:S27-S33. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is growing interest to use digital photographs in dental epidemiology. However, the reporting of procedures and metric-based performance outcomes from training to promote data quality prior to actual scoring of digital images has not been optimal.

METHODS

A training study was undertaken to assess training methodology and to select a group of scorers to assess images for dental fluorosis captured during the 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Ten examiners and 2 reference examiners assessed dental fluorosis using the Deans Index (DI) and the Thylstrup-Fejerskov (TF) Index. Trainees were evaluated using 128 digital images of upper anterior central incisors at three different periods and with approximately 40 participants during two other periods. Scoring of all digital images was done using a secured, web-based system.

RESULTS

When assessing for nominal fluorosis (apparent vs. non-apparent), the unweighted Kappa for DI ranged from 0.68 to 0.77 and when using an ordinal scale, the linear-weighted kappa for DI ranged from 0.43 to 0.69 during the final evaluation. When assessing for nominal fluorosis using TF, the unweighted Kappa ranged from 0.67 to 0.89 and when using an ordinal scale, the linear-weighted kappa for TF ranged from 0.61 to 0.77 during the final evaluation. No examiner improvement was observed when a clinical assessment feature was added during training to assess dental fluorosis using TF, results using DI was less clear.

CONCLUSION

Providing examiners theoretical material and scoring criteria prior to training may be minimally sufficient to calibrate examiners to score digital photographs. There may be some benefit in providing an in-person training to discuss criteria and review previously scored images. Previous experience as a clinical examiner seems to provide a slight advantage at scoring photographs for DI, but minimizing the number of scorers does improve inter-examiner concordance for both DI and TF.

摘要

背景

在口腔流行病学中使用数码照片的兴趣日益浓厚。然而,在对数字图像进行实际评分之前,为了提高数据质量,针对培训过程和基于度量的绩效结果的报告并不理想。

方法

进行了一项培训研究,以评估培训方法,并选择一组评分员来评估在 2013-2014 年全国健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)期间拍摄的氟斑牙的数字图像。十位考官和两位参考考官使用 Dean 指数(DI)和 Thylstrup-Fejerskov(TF)指数评估氟斑牙。在三个不同时期,对 128 张上前中切牙的数字图像进行了 128 次评估,另外两个时期大约有 40 名参与者。所有数字图像的评分均使用安全的基于网络的系统进行。

结果

在评估名义性氟斑牙(明显与非明显)时,DI 的非加权 Kappa 值范围为 0.68 至 0.77,而在使用有序尺度时,DI 的线性加权 Kappa 值范围为 0.43 至 0.69 在最后评估期间。在使用 TF 评估名义性氟斑牙时,未加权 Kappa 值范围为 0.67 至 0.89,而在使用有序尺度时,TF 的线性加权 Kappa 值范围为 0.61 至 0.77 在最后评估期间。当在培训期间添加评估 TF 氟斑牙的临床评估功能时,未观察到考官的改进,而 DI 的结果则不太清楚。

结论

在培训之前为考官提供理论材料和评分标准可能足以校准考官对数字照片的评分。提供面对面的培训以讨论标准和审查以前评分的图像可能会有一些好处。以前作为临床考官的经验似乎在评分 DI 照片时略有优势,但尽量减少评分员的数量可以提高 DI 和 TF 的考官间一致性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验