Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun 25;11(12):1154-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.019.
The aim of this study was to assess the implications of concomitant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients undergoing valve-in-valve (VIV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Patients undergoing VIV transcatheter aortic valve replacement with concomitant TR may have worse outcomes, and optimal management remains undetermined.
The multicenter PARTNER 2 (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) VIV trial enrolled patients with symptomatic degenerated surgical aortic bioprostheses who were at high risk for reoperation. Outcomes were assessed between patients with mild or no TR versus moderate or severe TR.
A total of 237 patients underwent VIV procedures (mean age 78.7 ± 10.8 years, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 9.1 ± 4.8%). In this cohort, 162 patients (68.4%) had mild or no TR, and 75 patients (31.6%) had moderate or severe TR. Although there was no difference in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV symptomatic status (89.3% vs. 91.4%; p = 0.62) or moderate or severe right ventricular dysfunction (9.4% vs. 16.9%; p = 0.11), patients with moderate or severe TR were more likely to be at high surgical risk, with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of >8 (62.7% vs 46.9%; p = 0.02). There was no difference in a composite endpoint of death and rehospitalization between moderate or severe TR and mild or no TR, either at 30 days (10.7% vs. 9.9%; p = 0.85) or at 1-year follow-up (24.1% vs. 23.2%; p = 0.80). There was a significant reduction in overall moderate or severe TR from baseline at 30 days (31.1% vs. 21.1%; p = 0.002), which was sustained at 1-year follow-up (38.0% vs. 22.8%; p = 0.004).
Despite higher predicted surgical risk, the presence of TR was not a predictor of long-term outcomes. Importantly, there was significant reduction in TR severity at both short- and long-term follow-up. In selected patients undergoing VIV transcatheter aortic valve replacement, it may be appropriate to conservatively manage concomitant TR.
本研究旨在评估行经导管主动脉瓣置换术中合并三尖瓣反流(TR)对患者的影响。
行经导管主动脉瓣置换术中合并 TR 的患者可能预后更差,但其最佳治疗方法仍未确定。
多中心 PARTNER 2(主动脉瓣经导管置换术)VIV 试验纳入了有症状的退行性外科生物瓣主动脉瓣置换高危患者。在该研究中,根据患者 TR 程度分为轻度或无 TR 组与中度或重度 TR 组,评估两组患者的结局。
共有 237 例患者接受了 VIV 手术(平均年龄 78.7 ± 10.8 岁,平均胸外科医师协会评分 9.1 ± 4.8%)。在该队列中,162 例(68.4%)患者为轻度或无 TR,75 例(31.6%)患者为中度或重度 TR。尽管两组纽约心脏协会心功能 III 或 IV 级有症状患者比例(89.3% vs. 91.4%;p = 0.62)或中度或重度右心室功能障碍患者比例(9.4% vs. 16.9%;p = 0.11)无差异,但中度或重度 TR 患者更有可能为外科高危,胸外科医师协会评分>8 分(62.7% vs. 46.9%;p = 0.02)。30 天(10.7% vs. 9.9%;p = 0.85)和 1 年随访(24.1% vs. 23.2%;p = 0.80)时,中度或重度 TR 患者的死亡和再住院复合终点无差异。30 天时(31.1% vs. 21.1%;p = 0.002)和 1 年随访时(38.0% vs. 22.8%;p = 0.004),TR 严重程度均显著降低。
尽管预测外科风险较高,但 TR 并不能预测长期结局。重要的是,短期和长期随访时 TR 严重程度均显著降低。在接受 VIV 经导管主动脉瓣置换术的患者中,对合并 TR 进行保守治疗可能是合适的。