Suppr超能文献

口服抗凝治疗与拔牙,现有证据支持停药期吗?

Oral anticoagulant therapy and tooth extraction, does the evidence support drug holidays?

作者信息

Madeley Ed, Duane Brett

机构信息

Dublin Dental University Hospital, Ireland.

出版信息

Evid Based Dent. 2018 Jun;19(2):53-54. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401308.

Abstract

Data sourcesPubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane library, China Biology Medicine Disc (CBM), China National Knowledge infrastructure (CNKI).Study SelectionThis study included only human randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs). To be included studies had to include patients prescribed oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) requiring dental extraction(s). Comparison was made between patients discontinuing OAT for the dental extraction(s) and those continuing with their OAT. The outcome measured was post-operative bleeding identified by clinician or patient.Data extraction and synthesisThe methods of data extraction were based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The search was carried out by two reviewers from the data sources listed above. There was no indication of hand searching references of relevant studies or reputable publications, nor any mention of contacting clinical experts or researchers in this field. Language restrictions were unclear. The included studies were assessed for bias using a seven point classification, and a clear traffic light diagram was included to demonstrate the risk of bias of the included studies.ResultsNine hundred and sixty-eight studies were identified with six meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the six studies, four were RCTs and two were CCTs encompassing 314 subjects who continued their OAT during tooth extraction(s) and 277 who discontinued their OAT to allow for tooth extraction(s). Five of the six studies were found to have high risk of bias.A meta-analysis of the six studies was conducted. The incidence of post-operative bleeding was 10.8% where OAT was continued and 8.3% where it was discontinued, showing no statistically significant difference. The relative risk ratio to continuing OAT during tooth extraction was 1.31 and 95% confidence interval, albeit with a wide range of 0.79-2.14.ConclusionsAccording to the current literature available on this subject, the results of this meta-analysis suggest that patients continuing OAT during tooth extraction do not have an increased incidence of post-operative bleeding following tooth extraction compared to patients who discontinue their OAT.

摘要

数据来源

PubMed、EMBASE、科学网、考克兰图书馆、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国知网。

研究选择

本研究仅纳入人类随机对照试验(RCT)和临床对照试验(CCT)。纳入的研究必须包括接受口服抗凝治疗(OAT)且需要拔牙的患者。对拔牙时停用OAT的患者和继续进行OAT的患者进行比较。测量的结果是由临床医生或患者确定的术后出血情况。

数据提取与综合

数据提取方法基于《考克兰系统评价干预措施手册》。检索由上述数据来源的两名评审员进行。未表明对相关研究或著名出版物的参考文献进行手工检索,也未提及联系该领域的临床专家或研究人员。语言限制不明确。使用七点分类法对纳入的研究进行偏倚评估,并包含清晰的红绿灯图以展示纳入研究的偏倚风险。

结果

共识别出968项研究,其中六项符合纳入和排除标准。在这六项研究中,四项为RCT,两项为CCT,涵盖314名在拔牙期间继续进行OAT的受试者和277名停用OAT以进行拔牙的受试者。六项研究中有五项被发现存在高偏倚风险。

对这六项研究进行了荟萃分析。继续进行OAT时术后出血的发生率为10.8%,停用OAT时为8.3%,无统计学显著差异。拔牙期间继续进行OAT的相对风险比为1.31,95%置信区间,尽管范围较宽,为0.79 - 2.14。

结论

根据关于该主题的现有文献,这项荟萃分析的结果表明,与停用OAT的患者相比拔牙期间继续进行OAT的患者拔牙后术后出血的发生率没有增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验