Centre for Human Exposure Science (CHES), Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM), Research Avenue North, Riccarton, Edinburgh, UK.
Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Centre for Epidemiology, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ann Work Expo Health. 2018 Jul 6;62(6):639-662. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxy048.
Establishing the routes of exposure is a fundamental component of the risk assessment process for every dangerous substance. The present study systematically reviews the available literature to assess the relevance of the different routes and forms of exposure that are of concern for the protection of workers during the manufacture, handling, or end-use of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs).
A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature published between 2000 and 2015 was completed. Only studies including measurements of inhalation or dermal exposure were selected and used to identify the exposure situations for which the measurements were collected. The identified exposure situations were grouped based on the type of ENM (i.e. carbon nanotubes and fibres, silicon-based, titanium dioxide, other metal oxides, pure elemental metals, and other ENMs) and activity involved. The grouped exposure situations were assessed to provide a conclusion regarding the likelihood, form, and route of exposure. Assessment of the likelihood of exposure was based on well-defined criteria using a previously established decision logic for inhalation exposure and the outputs from measurements and/or conceptual models for dermal/ingestion exposure. For each combination of nano-activity and type of ENM, the aggregated likelihood across all relevant individual assessments was used to draw conclusions about the relevance of both the inhalation and dermal/ingestion routes. Based on the quality of the data, the strength of the evidence was also evaluated.
One hundred and seven studies were identified during the review process, reporting 424 individual exposure assessments. Measurement data were limited for dermal/ingestion exposure and for inhalation exposure for downstream use and end-of-life. However, the data provided high-quality evidence that in occupational settings all three routes can be of relevance for exposure to ENMs. In general, whenever inhalation exposure occurs then dermal and inadvertent ingestion exposure may occur due to surface deposition and transfer due to the ENMs release. However, for some forms of exposure (e.g. suspension/liquids), dermal exposure can occur even when inhalation exposure is unlikely. An increased likelihood of exposure was observed for manual activities such as cleaning and maintenance, collection/harvesting, spraying, and finishing as well as those involving feeding into a process and handling of powders outside enclosures. The likelihood of exposure was affected by the presence of risk management measures and the scale of the production involved.
This literature review provides evidence that for ENMs, as found for other materials, the likelihood of the exposure depends largely on the physical form of the substance as well as the applied process and operational conditions. These results can be used to provide first indications of the likelihood of exposure and guidance for exposure controls in workplaces. However, there is a clear lack of high-quality exposure data, in particular for downstream use and end-of-life scenarios and in low- and medium-income countries.
确定暴露途径是对每种危险物质进行风险评估的基本组成部分。本研究系统地回顾了现有文献,以评估在制造、处理或最终使用工程纳米材料(ENM)期间,与工人保护相关的不同途径和形式的暴露的相关性。
对 2000 年至 2015 年期间发表的同行评议文献进行了系统回顾。仅选择了包括吸入或皮肤暴露测量的研究,并用于识别收集测量数据的暴露情况。根据 ENM 的类型(即碳纳米管和纤维、硅基、二氧化钛、其他金属氧化物、纯元素金属和其他 ENM)和所涉及的活动,对识别出的暴露情况进行了分组。根据暴露情况进行分组,以提供对暴露的可能性、形式和途径的结论。暴露可能性的评估是基于使用先前为吸入暴露建立的决策逻辑和皮肤/摄入暴露的测量和/或概念模型来定义明确标准的。对于每一种纳米活动和 ENM 的组合,通过对所有相关个体评估的综合可能性,得出关于吸入和皮肤/摄入途径相关性的结论。基于数据的质量,还评估了证据的强度。
在审查过程中发现了 107 项研究,报告了 424 项单独的暴露评估。皮肤/摄入暴露和下游使用和寿命终点的吸入暴露数据有限。然而,这些数据提供了高质量的证据,证明在职业环境中,所有三种途径都可能与接触 ENM 有关。一般来说,只要发生吸入暴露,就可能由于 ENM 的释放而导致表面沉积和转移,从而发生皮肤和无意摄入暴露。然而,对于某些形式的暴露(例如悬浮液/液体),即使吸入暴露不太可能发生,也可能发生皮肤暴露。在清洁和维护、收集/收获、喷涂、整理等手动活动以及在外壳外将粉末进料到工艺中和处理粉末时,观察到暴露的可能性增加。暴露的可能性受风险管理措施的存在和所涉及的生产规模的影响。
本文献综述提供的证据表明,对于 ENM,与其他材料一样,暴露的可能性在很大程度上取决于物质的物理形态以及应用的工艺和操作条件。这些结果可用于提供工作场所暴露可能性的初步指示和暴露控制指南。然而,特别是在下游使用和寿命终点以及中低收入国家,缺乏高质量的暴露数据。