Hachenberger Yves Uwe, Krause Benjamin Christoph, Kriegel Fabian Lukas, Reichardt Philipp, Tentschert Jutta, Jungnickel Harald, Bierkandt Frank Stefan, Laux Peter, Panne Ulrich, Luch Andreas
Department of Chemical & Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.
Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Richard-Willstätter-Strasse 11, 12489 Berlin, Germany.
Molecules. 2025 Apr 7;30(7):1647. doi: 10.3390/molecules30071647.
The use of different nanoparticles (NPs) is increasing in a wide variety of everyday products. Nevertheless, most studies concerning NP risk assessment have evaluated exposure scenarios involving a single kind of NP. A stepwise study distinguishing between the effects resulting from exposure to one kind of NP and those resulting from different co-exposure scenarios to Al2O3 and CeO2 NPs at concentrations below acute toxicity was conducted with different analytical techniques. As a starting point, WST-1 viability assays were performed to assess whether the chosen exposure concentrations resulted in any acute loss of viability, which would hamper further insight into the cellular response to NP exposure. Then, data on NP dissolution and uptake were obtained via single-particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (spICP-MS) and microwave-assisted ICP-MS. Additionally, time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) was performed to check for differences in the biological response to the exposure scenarios at the single-cell level. It was found that the proposed combined techniques provide insight into changes in biological responses as well as cellular metal contents among the exposure scenarios. In this work, a comprehensive tiered analytical strategy for evaluating the biological responses to challenging exposure scenarios is provided. The results highlight the necessity of selecting situations more closely resembling real life-including concentrations below acute toxicity and potential interactions due to multiple NPs-when estimating potential health risks. These findings thus provide a foundation and an incentive for further research into the complex processes leading to the observed effects.
各种日常用品中不同纳米颗粒(NP)的使用正在增加。然而,大多数关于NP风险评估的研究都评估了涉及单一类型NP的暴露情况。本研究采用不同的分析技术,分步骤区分了暴露于一种NP所产生的影响与在低于急性毒性浓度下同时暴露于Al2O3和CeO2 NPs的不同联合暴露情况所产生的影响。作为起点,进行了WST-1活力测定,以评估所选的暴露浓度是否导致任何急性活力丧失,这会妨碍对NP暴露的细胞反应的进一步深入了解。然后,通过单颗粒电感耦合等离子体质谱(spICP-MS)和微波辅助ICP-MS获得了NP溶解和摄取的数据。此外,还进行了飞行时间二次离子质谱(ToF-SIMS),以检查单细胞水平上对暴露情况的生物反应差异。结果发现,所提出的联合技术能够深入了解暴露情况下生物反应的变化以及细胞内金属含量。在这项工作中,提供了一种全面的分层分析策略,用于评估对具有挑战性的暴露情况的生物反应。结果强调,在估计潜在健康风险时,需要选择更接近现实生活的情况,包括低于急性毒性的浓度以及多种NP之间的潜在相互作用。因此,这些发现为进一步研究导致观察到的效应的复杂过程提供了基础和动力。