From the Department of Anesthesiology.
Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health Science & Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Anesth Analg. 2018 Oct;127(4):855-863. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003579.
Complication rates after hepatic resection can be affected by management decisions of the hospital care team and/or disparities in care. This is true in many other surgical populations, but little study has been done regarding patients undergoing hepatectomy.
Data from the claims-based national Premier Perspective database were used for 2006 to 2014. The analytical sample consisted of adults undergoing partial hepatectomy and total hepatic lobectomy with anesthesia care consisting of general anesthesia (GA) only or neuraxial and GA (n = 9442). The key independent variable was type of anesthesia that was categorized as GA versus GA + neuraxial. The outcomes examined were clinical complications and health care resource utilization. Unadjusted bivariate and adjusted multivariate analyses were conducted to examine the effects of the different types of anesthesia on clinical complications and health care resource utilization after controlling for patient- and hospital-level characteristics.
Approximately 9% of patients were provided with GA + neuraxial anesthesia during hepatic resection. In multivariate analyses, no association was observed between types of anesthesia and clinical complications and/or health care utilization (eg, admission to intensive care unit). However, patients who received blood transfusions were significantly more likely to have complications and intensive care unit stays. In addition, certain disparities of care, including having surgery in a rural hospital, were associated with poorer outcomes.
Neuraxial anesthesia utilization was not associated with improvement in clinical outcome or cost among patients undergoing hepatic resections when compared to patients receiving GA alone. Future research may focus on prospective data sources with more clinical information on such patients and examine the effects of GA + neuraxial anesthesia on various complications and health care resource utilization.
肝切除术后的并发症发生率可能受到医院治疗团队的管理决策和/或护理差异的影响。这在许多其他手术人群中都是如此,但对于接受肝切除术的患者,研究甚少。
使用基于索赔的全国 Premier 透视数据库中的数据,对 2006 年至 2014 年的数据进行分析。分析样本包括接受部分肝切除术和全肝叶切除术的成年人,麻醉护理仅包括全身麻醉 (GA) 或脊麻和 GA (n=9442)。关键的独立变量是麻醉类型,分为 GA 与 GA+脊麻。检查的结果是临床并发症和医疗保健资源利用。在控制患者和医院水平特征后,进行未调整的双变量和调整后的多变量分析,以检查不同类型的麻醉对临床并发症和医疗保健资源利用的影响。
约 9%的肝切除术患者接受了 GA+脊麻麻醉。在多变量分析中,麻醉类型与临床并发症和/或医疗保健利用之间没有关联(例如,入住重症监护病房)。然而,接受输血的患者发生并发症和入住重症监护病房的可能性显著增加。此外,包括在农村医院进行手术在内的某些护理差异与较差的结果相关。
与单独接受 GA 麻醉的患者相比,接受脊麻麻醉的患者在肝切除术后的临床结果或成本方面没有改善。未来的研究可能集中在具有更多此类患者临床信息的前瞻性数据源上,并研究 GA+脊麻麻醉对各种并发症和医疗保健资源利用的影响。