Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019 Dec;269(8):887-896. doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0918-y. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
Amotivation is a major determinant of functional outcome in schizophrenia but it is understudied in the early course of illness. There is a paucity of longitudinal research investigating predictors of amotivation. In this study, we aimed to examine baseline cognitive and clinical predictors of amotivation at 6 and 12 months of follow-up in patients aged 18-55 years presenting with first-episode DSM-IV schizophrenia-spectrum disorder (FES). Of 145 patients recruited at intake, 116 and 113 completed assessments at 6- and 12-month follow-up, respectively. Amotivation was measured by avolition-apathy and anhedonia-asociality subscale scores of the Scale of the Assessment of Negative Symptoms. Cognitive assessment was administered at baseline. As executive dysfunction has been more consistently found to be associated with negative symptoms and amotivation in prior literature, we adopted fractionated approach to subdivide executive function into distinct components encompassing switching and flexibility, response initiation, response inhibition, planning and strategy allocation, sustained attention and working memory. Our results showed that baseline amotivation (p = 0.01) and switching and flexibility (p = 0.01) were found to independently predict amotivation at 6 months follow-up. Baseline amotivation (p < 0.01) and switching and flexibility (albeit with trend-wise significance, p = 0.06) were also retained in final multivariate regression model for 12-month amotivation prediction. No other executive components or cognitive domains predicted amotivation at follow-up. Findings of our study thus indicate amotivation at initial presentation as a critical determinant of subsequent motivational deficits over 1 year of treatment for FES patients. Cognitive flexibility might be specifically related to the development of amotivation in the early stage of illness.
动机缺乏是精神分裂症功能结局的主要决定因素,但在疾病早期阶段研究较少。目前纵向研究调查动机缺乏预测因素的研究较少。在这项研究中,我们旨在研究首次出现 DSM-IV 精神分裂症谱系障碍(FES)的 18-55 岁患者的基线认知和临床因素,预测其在 6 和 12 个月随访时的动机缺乏。在入组的 145 名患者中,116 名和 113 名患者分别在 6 个月和 12 个月的随访时完成了评估。动机缺乏采用阴性症状评定量表的意志减退-淡漠和快感缺失-社交回避分量表评分进行测量。认知评估在基线时进行。由于在之前的文献中,执行功能障碍与阴性症状和动机缺乏的关系更为一致,我们采用了分数化的方法将执行功能分为不同的成分,包括转换和灵活性、反应启动、反应抑制、计划和策略分配、持续注意力和工作记忆。我们的结果表明,基线动机缺乏(p=0.01)和转换和灵活性(p=0.01)独立预测 6 个月时的动机缺乏。基线动机缺乏(p<0.01)和转换和灵活性(尽管具有趋势意义上的显著性,p=0.06)也保留在最终的 12 个月动机缺乏预测的多元回归模型中。其他执行成分或认知域在随访时均未预测动机缺乏。因此,我们的研究结果表明,FES 患者在治疗 1 年后,初始表现出的动机缺乏是随后出现动机缺陷的关键决定因素。认知灵活性可能与疾病早期动机缺乏的发展有特定的关系。