• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个性化反馈酒精干预对非学生成年初显期饮酒者的中介和调节作用。

Mediators and Moderators of a Personalized Feedback Alcohol Intervention for Nonstudent Emerging Adult Drinkers.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia.

Virginia Consortium Program in Clinical Psychology, Norfolk, Virginia.

出版信息

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Sep;42(9):1756-1768. doi: 10.1111/acer.13819. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1111/acer.13819
PMID:29935086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6120787/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The main objective of this study was to test proposed mediators and moderators of a personalized feedback alcohol intervention (PFI) on alcohol use. Data for the current investigation came from an earlier randomized controlled trial of a PFI targeted for nonstudent heavy drinkers between 18 and 25 years.

METHODS

Participants were 164 (65.9% men) drinkers recruited from the community. They were randomly assigned to either a single-session PFI or an assessment-only (AO) control group. Follow-up assessments at 1 and 3 months were included for analysis.

RESULTS

Perceived drinking norms mediated the intervention effect on quantity, frequency, and peak drinking; 2 dimensions of protective behavioral strategies (PBS) mediated the intervention effect on peak drinking; and drinking to cope motives did not mediate any drinking outcomes. Of the moderating factors examined (i.e., norms, PBS, drink to cope motives, age, gender), only PBS related to serious harm reduction moderated intervention impact. Specifically, for those high in serious harm reduction PBS at baseline, postintervention reductions in drinking were stronger for the PFI group compared to AO.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, findings highlight the importance of correcting misperceived drinking norms and addressing the use of specific PBS in brief interventions. The knowledge gained from this study represents an important step toward minimizing drinking-related harms that are disproportionately experienced by those with lower educational attainment.

摘要

背景

本研究的主要目的是检验个性化反馈酒精干预(PFI)对酒精使用的中介和调节因素。本研究的数据来自之前一项针对 18-25 岁非学生重度饮酒者的 PFI 的随机对照试验。

方法

参与者为 164 名(65.9%为男性)社区招募的饮酒者。他们被随机分配到单次 PFI 组或仅评估(AO)对照组。包括 1 个月和 3 个月的随访评估进行分析。

结果

感知饮酒规范中介了干预对饮酒量、频率和峰值饮酒的影响;保护行为策略(PBS)的 2 个维度中介了干预对峰值饮酒的影响;而饮酒应对动机并未介导任何饮酒结果。在检查的调节因素中(即规范、PBS、饮酒应对动机、年龄、性别),只有与严重伤害减少相关的 PBS 调节了干预效果。具体来说,对于基线时 PBS 严重伤害减少较高的个体,与 AO 相比,PFI 组在干预后的饮酒量减少更强。

结论

总体而言,研究结果强调了在简短干预中纠正错误感知的饮酒规范和解决特定 PBS 使用的重要性。本研究获得的知识是朝着减少那些受教育程度较低的人过度经历的与饮酒相关的伤害迈出的重要一步。

相似文献

1
Mediators and Moderators of a Personalized Feedback Alcohol Intervention for Nonstudent Emerging Adult Drinkers.个性化反馈酒精干预对非学生成年初显期饮酒者的中介和调节作用。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Sep;42(9):1756-1768. doi: 10.1111/acer.13819. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
2
Personalized Boosters After a Computerized Intervention Targeting College Drinking: A Randomized Controlled Trial.个性化强化剂在针对大学生饮酒的计算机化干预后的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Sep;42(9):1735-1747. doi: 10.1111/acer.13815. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
3
Descriptive Norms but not Harm Reduction Strategies as a Mediator of Personalized Boosters After a Computerized College Drinking Intervention.描述性规范而非减少伤害策略作为计算机辅助大学生饮酒干预后个性化助推器的中介因素。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Jan;44(1):284-296. doi: 10.1111/acer.14248. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
4
A Randomized Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Nonstudent Emerging Adult At-Risk Drinkers.一项针对非学生成年早期高危饮酒者的个性化反馈干预的随机试验。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Apr;42(4):781-794. doi: 10.1111/acer.13606. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
5
A latent profile analysis of drinking patterns among nonstudent emerging adults.非学生青年成年人饮酒模式的潜在类别分析
Addict Behav. 2016 Nov;62:14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
6
Personalized feedback tempers weekend increases in alcohol use among nonstudent emerging adult drinkers.个性化反馈可以缓解非学生成年初显期饮酒者周末饮酒量的增加。
Addict Behav. 2020 Jun;105:106332. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106332. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
7
Alcohol-Induced Amnesia and Personalized Drinking Feedback: Blackouts Predict Intervention Response.酒精性遗忘症和个性化饮酒反馈:断片可预测干预反应。
Behav Ther. 2019 Jan;50(1):25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
8
The Influence of a Brief Alcohol Intervention on Alcohol Use Trajectories in Nonstudent Emerging Adult Drinkers.简短酒精干预对非学生成年初显期饮酒者饮酒轨迹的影响。
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(12):2025-2032. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1626434. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
9
Social network moderators of brief alcohol intervention impact.简短酒精干预影响的社交网络管理员。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Sep;36(6):696-709. doi: 10.1037/adb0000783. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
10
Alcohol use variability in a community-based sample of nonstudent emerging adult heavy drinkers.基于社区的非学生青年重度饮酒者样本中的酒精使用变异性。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2016 Nov;42(6):698-706. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2016.1183671. Epub 2016 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Grouping motivational interviewing for alcohol craving in individuals with alcohol use disorder: the influence of drinking history on its efficacy.针对酒精使用障碍个体的酒精渴望进行分组动机访谈:饮酒史对其疗效的影响。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02054-4.
2
A systematic review of the associations between protective behavioral strategies and heavy alcohol consumption and consequences among young adults.一项关于保护性行为策略与年轻成年人重度饮酒和后果之间关联的系统评价。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2024 Jun;38(4):488-506. doi: 10.1037/adb0001002. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
3
Grouping motivational interviewing is only effective for younger patients with alcohol dependence in the rehabilitation stage.

本文引用的文献

1
Personalized Boosters After a Computerized Intervention Targeting College Drinking: A Randomized Controlled Trial.个性化强化剂在针对大学生饮酒的计算机化干预后的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Sep;42(9):1735-1747. doi: 10.1111/acer.13815. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
2
A Randomized Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Nonstudent Emerging Adult At-Risk Drinkers.一项针对非学生成年早期高危饮酒者的个性化反馈干预的随机试验。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Apr;42(4):781-794. doi: 10.1111/acer.13606. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
3
Drinking to cope mediates the relationship between depression and alcohol risk: Different pathways for college and non-college young adults.
分组动机性访谈仅对处于康复阶段的年轻酒精依赖患者有效。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Mar;275(2):431-438. doi: 10.1007/s00406-023-01736-1. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
4
Normative Perceptions of Peer Drinking Distinguish High-Intensity Drinkers from Other Drinking Groups.同辈饮酒的规范认知将高强度饮酒者与其他饮酒群体区分开来。
Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(1):69-78. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2259463. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
5
The Moderating Effect of Educational Background on the Efficacy of a Computer-Based Brief Intervention Addressing the Full Spectrum of Alcohol Use: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于教育背景对基于计算机的简短干预措施治疗全范围饮酒疗效的调节作用:随机对照试验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jun 30;8(6):e33345. doi: 10.2196/33345.
6
Descriptive Norms but not Harm Reduction Strategies as a Mediator of Personalized Boosters After a Computerized College Drinking Intervention.描述性规范而非减少伤害策略作为计算机辅助大学生饮酒干预后个性化助推器的中介因素。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Jan;44(1):284-296. doi: 10.1111/acer.14248. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
7
The Influence of a Brief Alcohol Intervention on Alcohol Use Trajectories in Nonstudent Emerging Adult Drinkers.简短酒精干预对非学生成年初显期饮酒者饮酒轨迹的影响。
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(12):2025-2032. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1626434. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
饮酒应对中介了抑郁与酒精风险之间的关系:对大学生和非大学生年轻人的不同作用途径。
Addict Behav. 2018 May;80:116-123. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.01.023. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
4
Drinking to cope moderates the efficacy of changing veteran drinking norms as a strategy for reducing drinking and alcohol-related problems among U.S. veterans.饮酒应对会削弱改变退伍军人饮酒规范作为减少美国退伍军人饮酒和与酒精相关问题的策略的效果。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Mar;32(2):213-223. doi: 10.1037/adb0000347. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
5
Motivations and Consequences of Alcohol Use among Heavy Drinking Nonstudent Emerging Adults.大量饮酒的非学生青年成年人饮酒的动机与后果
J Adolesc Res. 2017 Nov;32(6):667-695. doi: 10.1177/0743558416630812. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
6
Magnitude and Trends in Heavy Episodic Drinking, Alcohol-Impaired Driving, and Alcohol-Related Mortality and Overdose Hospitalizations Among Emerging Adults of College Ages 18-24 in the United States, 1998-2014.1998 - 2014年美国18 - 24岁大学适龄新兴成年人中重度暴饮、酒后驾车、与酒精相关的死亡率及过量用药住院情况的规模和趋势
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Jul;78(4):540-548. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.540.
7
Drinking Beyond the Binge Threshold: Predictors, Consequences, and Changes in the U.S.饮酒超过 binge 阈值:美国的预测因素、后果和变化
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jun;52(6):717-727. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.02.014.
8
Moderators of outcome in a technology-based intervention to prevent and reduce problem drinking among adolescents.一项基于技术的干预措施中预防和减少青少年问题饮酒结果的调节因素。
Addict Behav. 2017 Sep;72:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
9
Substance use prevention and treatment outcomes for emerging adults in non-college settings: A meta-analysis.非大学环境中新兴成年人物质使用预防与治疗的结果:一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 May;31(3):242-254. doi: 10.1037/adb0000267. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
10
How does brief motivational intervention change heavy drinking and harm among underage young adult drinkers?简短的动机干预如何改变未成年青年饮酒者的重度饮酒行为及危害?
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 May;85(5):447-458. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000200. Epub 2017 Mar 13.