Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), Division of Therapeutic Equivalence, Brasilia, Brazil; Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Centre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
J Pharm Sci. 2018 Oct;107(10):2519-2530. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
The growth in the utilization of systems thinking principles has created a paradigm shift in the regulatory sciences and drug product development. Instead of relying extensively on end product testing and one-size-fits-all regulatory criteria, this new paradigm has focused on building quality into the product by design and fostering the development of product-specific, clinically relevant specifications. In this context, this commentary describes the evolution of bioequivalence regulations up to the current day and discusses the potential of applying a Bayesian-like approach, considering all relevant prior knowledge, to guide regulatory bioequivalence decisions in a patient-centric environment.
系统思维原则的应用不断增加,已经在监管科学和药物产品开发领域引发了范式转变。新范式不再广泛依赖于最终产品测试和一刀切的监管标准,而是通过设计将质量构建到产品中,并促进制定特定于产品、具有临床相关性的规范。在此背景下,本文描述了生物等效性法规的发展历程,直至今日,并讨论了在以患者为中心的环境中应用类似于贝叶斯的方法,考虑所有相关先验知识,来指导监管生物等效性决策的可能性。