• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自发性冠状动脉夹层:一项单中心病例系列研究及文献综述。

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A single-center case series and literature review.

作者信息

Abreu Glória, Galvão Braga Carlos, Costa João, Azevedo Pedro, Marques Jorge

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.

Cardiology Department, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.

出版信息

Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018 Aug;37(8):707-713. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2017.07.019. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.repc.2017.07.019
PMID:29935775
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an unusual cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Better recognition and diagnosis has raised awareness of this condition. However, the pathophysiology of SCAD and its prognosis are still little understood. We aimed to investigate the characteristics and prognosis of patients with SCAD, and subsequently performed a review of literature.

METHODS

Single-center, retrospective study performed in patients hospitalized from January 2010 to December 2016 with suspected ACS (n=5002) whose final diagnosis was SCAD (n=27; 0.5%).

RESULTS

Patients with SCAD were mainly female (81.5%; n=22), with median age of 56. Predisposing factors were identified in 12 (44%) patients and precipitating factors in three (11.1%). Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) was the main form of presentation (51.9%). The left anterior descending artery (LAD) territory was the most commonly involved (n=12, 44.4%). Type 2 dissection was the most prevalent angiographic pattern (n=17, 63%). The majority of patients (n=15; 55.6%) were managed medically and the remaining patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents. Seven patients re-infarcted while in the hospital. Over the median follow-up period of 20 months, 7.4% of patients (n=2) had symptoms of heart failure (HF) and 14.8% developed ACS (in three patients the event occurred in a coronary territory other than that of the index case, and in one patient it occurred in the previously affected territory). There were no deaths.

CONCLUSION

In the studied population, SCAD was more prevalent in middle-aged women. Despite the high prevalence of in-hospital re-infarction or during follow-up, the prognosis was good overall.

摘要

背景

自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)是急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的一种不常见病因。对其更好的认识和诊断提高了对这种疾病的认知。然而,SCAD的病理生理学及其预后仍知之甚少。我们旨在研究SCAD患者的特征和预后,随后进行了文献综述。

方法

对2010年1月至2016年12月因疑似ACS住院的患者(n = 5002)进行单中心回顾性研究,最终诊断为SCAD的患者有27例(0.5%)。

结果

SCAD患者以女性为主(81.5%;n = 22),中位年龄为56岁。12例(44%)患者存在易感因素,3例(11.1%)有诱发因素。非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)是主要的表现形式(51.9%)。左前降支动脉(LAD)区域是最常受累的部位(n = 12,44.4%)。2型夹层是最常见的血管造影模式(n = 17,63%)。大多数患者(n = 15;55.6%)接受药物治疗,其余患者接受药物洗脱支架的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。7例患者在住院期间再次发生心肌梗死。在中位随访期20个月内,7.4%的患者(n = 2)出现心力衰竭(HF)症状,14.8%的患者发生ACS(3例事件发生在非索引病例的冠状动脉区域,1例发生在先前受累区域)。无死亡病例。

结论

在研究人群中,SCAD在中年女性中更为普遍。尽管住院期间或随访期间再次发生心肌梗死的发生率较高,但总体预后良好。

相似文献

1
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A single-center case series and literature review.自发性冠状动脉夹层:一项单中心病例系列研究及文献综述。
Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018 Aug;37(8):707-713. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2017.07.019. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
2
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: Ten years' experience of a tertiary center.自发性冠状动脉夹层:一家三级中心的十年经验。
Rev Port Cardiol. 2023 Mar;42(3):261-266. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2023.01.018. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
3
Trends in the Detection, Management and 30-Day Outcomes of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Six-Year, New Zealand Centre Experience.自发性冠状动脉夹层的检测、管理和 30 天结局趋势:六年新西兰中心经验。
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Jan;30(1):78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.06.020. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
4
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: Case series and review of literature.自发性冠状动脉夹层:病例系列及文献综述
Indian Heart J. 2016 Jul-Aug;68(4):480-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2015.11.039. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in the Gulf: G-SCAD Registry.海湾地区自发性冠状动脉夹层:G-SCAD 登记处。
Angiology. 2021 Jan;72(1):32-43. doi: 10.1177/0003319720946974. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
6
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Clinical Outcomes and Risk of Recurrence.自发性冠状动脉夹层:临床转归和复发风险。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 29;70(9):1148-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.053.
7
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Angiographic Follow-Up and Long-Term Clinical Outcome in a Predominantly Medically Treated Population.自发性冠状动脉夹层:以药物治疗为主的人群中的血管造影随访及长期临床结局
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan;89(1):59-68. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26383. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
8
Pregnancy-associated spontaneous coronary artery dissection: insights from a case series of 13 patients.妊娠相关自发性冠状动脉夹层:来自13例病例系列的见解
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jan;18(1):54-61. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew021. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
9
[Peripartum spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a case report].[围产期自发性冠状动脉夹层:一例报告]
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2016 Oct;17(10 Suppl 1):24S-27. doi: 10.1714/2372.25478.
10
Clinical features of spontaneous coronary artery dissection.自发性冠状动脉夹层的临床特征。
J Cardiol. 2014 Feb;63(2):119-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Simultaneous Takotsubo syndrome and spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a case report.同时发生的应激性心肌病和自发性冠状动脉夹层:一例报告
Br J Cardiol. 2024 Jul 17;31(3):029. doi: 10.5837/bjc.2024.029. eCollection 2024.
2
In-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD): a meta-analysis of conservative versus revascularization approaches.自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)的院内及长期临床结局:保守治疗与血运重建治疗方法的荟萃分析
Egypt Heart J. 2024 Nov 22;76(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s43044-024-00585-0.
3
The Self Sabotaging Vessel: A Case Report and Literature Review of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.
自我破坏的血管:一例自发性冠状动脉夹层的病例报告及文献综述
Cureus. 2021 Dec 30;13(12):e20835. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20835. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissections: A Systematic Review.自发性冠状动脉夹层:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 17;10(24):5925. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245925.
5
Revascularization in Patients With Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Where Are We Now?自发性冠状动脉夹层患者的血运重建:我们目前的进展如何?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 6;10(13):e018551. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018551. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
6
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: clinical implications and diagnostic challenges. Overlooked and underappreciated in Asia?自发性冠状动脉夹层:临床意义和诊断挑战。在亚洲被忽视和低估了吗?
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Nov;43(11):1240-1247. doi: 10.1002/clc.23484. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
7
Analysis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Depression, Anxiety, and Resiliency Within the Unique Population of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Survivors.自发性冠状动脉夹层幸存者这一独特人群中心因性应激障碍、抑郁、焦虑和适应力的分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 5;9(9):e014372. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014372. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
8
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: contemporary aspects of diagnosis and patient management.自发性冠状动脉夹层:诊断和患者管理的当代方面。
Open Heart. 2018 Nov 5;5(2):e000884. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000884. eCollection 2018.