Suppr超能文献

对流冷却的策略应用以最大化热梯度并降低奶牛的热应激反应。

Strategic application of convective cooling to maximize the thermal gradient and reduce heat stress response in dairy cows.

机构信息

Animal Sciences Division, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211.

Animal Sciences Division, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2018 Sep;101(9):8269-8283. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-14283. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

Abstract

This study determined the effectiveness of convective cooling at different times of day when air temperature (T) was cycled from day to night. Mid-lactation Holstein cows (n = 12) were placed in 3 environmental chambers (4 cows per chamber) and acclimated to T 19.9°C (thermoneutral; TN) for 7 d followed by an incremental increase over 3 d to a heat stress (HS) condition. Conditions were maintained for 11 d at high and low daily T of 33 and 23°C, respectively. To determine adaptive HS response, the HS period was divided into early (E: d 11 to 14) and late (L: d 17 to 20) periods. During HS, cows were exposed to continuous fan (convective) cooling (CC), 8-h day fan cooling (1100 to 1900 h; DC), or 8-h night fan cooling (2300 to 0700 h; NC). Compared with DC, the NC treatment maximized the thermal gradient during the convective cooling. Each animal received all treatments within 3 trials using a repeated 3 × 3 Latin square design. Cows were fed a total mixed ration and milked twice daily. Thermal status was assessed by using thermal conductance and average daily values for mean, minimum, and maximum rectal temperature (T), skin temperatures, and respiration rate. Percent reduction in dry matter intake from TN to HS was less for CC than DC and NC, with no change from E to L periods. The DC group exhibited the greatest trend for a percent reduction in total milk yield below CC due to the significantly lower morning milk production. All values for total daily milk production decreased from E to L periods, with E to L reductions in both morning and afternoon milk production. Minimum T for CC and NC cows was 0.4°C below DC. In contrast, maximum T was similar for NC and DC groups, at 0.5 to 0.6°C above the CC group. Skin temperature for CC cows was always less than DC cows. Skin temperature for NC cows was equal to CC for minimum skin temperature, but exceeded both CC and DC cows for maximum skin temperature. Average skin temperature decreased from E to L, which suggested heat adaptation. The thermal advantage of night (lowest T and greatest thermal gradient) versus day cooling (greatest T and lowest thermal gradient) was increased heat transfer via thermal conductance with NC. The higher thermal strain of DC cows caused a larger percent decrease in morning milk yield than for NC cows. In contrast, use of convective cooling at night in the absence of elevated humidity could sufficiently reduce heat strain beyond DC to maintain milk production at a level that is closer to that of CC cows.

摘要

本研究旨在确定在气温(T)从白天到夜间循环时,不同时间进行对流冷却的效果。选择处于泌乳中期的荷斯坦奶牛(n = 12),将其放置在 3 个环境室(每个环境室 4 头奶牛)中,并使其适应 19.9°C 的 T(热中性;TN)7 天,随后在 3 天内逐渐增加到热应激(HS)条件。在分别为 33°C 和 23°C 的高、低日 T 下,维持 11 天的条件。为了确定适应性 HS 反应,将 HS 期分为早期(E:第 11 至 14 天)和晚期(L:第 17 至 20 天)。在 HS 期间,奶牛持续接受风扇(对流)冷却(CC)、白天 8 小时风扇冷却(1100 至 1900 h;DC)或夜间 8 小时风扇冷却(2300 至 0700 h;NC)。与 DC 相比,NC 处理在对流冷却过程中最大程度地产生了热梯度。在 3 次试验中,每个动物都使用重复的 3×3 拉丁方设计接受了所有处理。奶牛每天饲喂全混合日粮并接受两次挤奶。通过热导率和平均直肠温度(T)、皮肤温度和呼吸率的平均日值评估热状态。与 DC 和 NC 相比,CC 处理使从 TN 到 HS 的干物质摄入量减少的百分比降低,E 期到 L 期没有变化。由于早上的产奶量明显较低,DC 组的总产奶量下降幅度最大,呈下降趋势。由于 E 期到 L 期的总产奶量下降,早晨和下午的产奶量都下降。CC 和 NC 奶牛的最低 T 比 DC 奶牛低 0.4°C。相比之下,NC 和 DC 组的最高 T 相似,比 CC 组高 0.5 至 0.6°C。CC 和 NC 奶牛的皮肤温度始终低于 DC 奶牛。NC 奶牛的最低皮肤温度与 CC 相同,但最高皮肤温度超过 CC 和 DC 奶牛。平均皮肤温度从 E 期到 L 期下降,这表明热适应。与白天(最高 T 和最低热梯度)相比,夜间(最低 T 和最大热梯度)冷却的优势在于通过热导率增加了热传递,从而使 NC 组的热应激增加。由于 DC 奶牛的热应激较大,因此早上的产奶量下降幅度比 NC 奶牛更大。相反,在没有升高湿度的情况下,夜间使用对流冷却可以将热应激降低到足以维持产奶量,使其接近 CC 奶牛的水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验