Suppr超能文献

前交叉韧带重建术采用自体腘绳肌腱与软组织移植物的临床疗效比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Comparison of clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft versus soft-tissue allograft: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Qiaoxi District, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, PR China; Key Laboratory of Biomechanics of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, PR China.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Qiaoxi District, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, PR China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:174-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.030. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hamstring tendon autografts and soft-tissue allograft are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the clinical outcomes between these two grafts are controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to compare clinical outcomes of primary ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts versus soft-tissue allografts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched through 8 September 2017 to identify randomized controlled studies that compared hamstring tendon autografts with soft-tissue allografts for primary ACL reconstruction. Two authors independently graded the methodological quality of each eligible study using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and extracted relevant data. Statistical heterogeneity among the trials was evaluated with chi-square and I-square tests. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify potential differences according to type of reconstruction technique (single-bundle or double-bundle).

RESULTS

Eight studies with 785 combined patients (396 hamstring tendon autografts and 389 soft-tissue allografts) were included. Two studies had a high risk of bias. The other six studies had unclear risk of bias. There were significant differences between the groups in subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (mean difference [MD], 2.43; 95%CI, 0.69-4.18; p = 0.006), Tegner score (MD, 0.24; 95%CI, 0.03-0.45; p = 0.03), and side-to-side difference (MD, -1.37; 95%CI, -2.44 to -0.30; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference between the groups in Lysholm score, complications, pivot shift test, anterior drawer test, Lachman test, overall IKDC score, or range of motion. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that for primary ACL reconstruction using the single-bundle technique, soft-tissue allografts were inferior to hamstring tendon autografts in subjective IKDC score, anterior drawer test, and side-to-side difference.

CONCLUSION

Soft-tissue allografts are inferior to hamstring tendon autografts with respect to subjective patient evaluation and knee stability but superior in the complication of hypoesthesia for patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction.

摘要

背景

腘绳肌腱自体移植物和软组织同种异体移植物常用于前交叉韧带(ACL)重建。然而,这两种移植物的临床结果存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在比较腘绳肌腱自体移植物与软组织同种异体移植物用于初次 ACL 重建的临床结果。

材料与方法

通过 2017 年 9 月 8 日检索 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆,以确定比较初次 ACL 重建中腘绳肌腱自体移植物与软组织同种异体移植物的随机对照研究。两位作者使用 Cochrane 协作工具独立评估每项合格研究的方法学质量,并提取相关数据。使用卡方和 I 平方检验评估试验间的统计学异质性。进行敏感性分析以探索异质性的来源。进行亚组分析以根据重建技术类型(单束或双束)确定潜在差异。

结果

纳入 8 项共 785 例联合患者的研究(396 例腘绳肌腱自体移植物和 389 例软组织同种异体移植物)。两项研究存在高偏倚风险,其他六项研究偏倚风险不明确。两组间主观国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分(平均差值 [MD],2.43;95%CI,0.69-4.18;p=0.006)、Tegner 评分(MD,0.24;95%CI,0.03-0.45;p=0.03)和侧移差值(MD,-1.37;95%CI,-2.44 至-0.30;p=0.01)存在显著差异。两组间 Lysholm 评分、并发症、髌腱试验、前抽屉试验、Lachman 试验、总体 IKDC 评分或活动范围无显著差异。亚组分析显示,对于初次 ACL 重建采用单束技术,软组织同种异体移植物在主观 IKDC 评分、前抽屉试验和侧移差值方面均劣于腘绳肌腱自体移植物。

结论

与腘绳肌腱自体移植物相比,软组织同种异体移植物在初次 ACL 重建患者的主观评估和膝关节稳定性方面较差,但在感觉迟钝等并发症方面优于腘绳肌腱自体移植物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验