Murthy Vaibhav, Dacus Dalton, Gamez Monica, Hu Changkun, Wendel Sebastian O, Snow Jazmine, Kahn Andrew, Walterhouse Stephen H, Wallace Nicholas A
Division of Biology, Kansas State University.
Bristol Medical School, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol.
J Vis Exp. 2018 Jun 8(136):57653. doi: 10.3791/57653.
The repair of double-stranded breaks (DSBs) in DNA is a highly coordinated process, necessitating the formation and resolution of multi-protein repair complexes. This process is regulated by a myriad of proteins that promote the association and disassociation of proteins to these lesions. Thanks in large part to the ability to perform functional screens of a vast library of proteins, there is a greater appreciation of the genes necessary for the double-strand DNA break repair. Often knockout or chemical inhibitor screens identify proteins involved in repair processes by using increased toxicity as a marker for a protein that is required for DSB repair. Although useful for identifying novel cellular proteins involved in maintaining genome fidelity, functional analysis requires the determination of whether the protein of interest promotes localization, formation, or resolution of repair complexes. The accumulation of repair proteins can be readily detected as distinct nuclear foci by immunofluorescence microscopy. Thus, association and disassociation of these proteins at sites of DNA damage can be accessed by observing these nuclear foci at representative intervals after the induction of double-strand DNA breaks. This approach can also identify mis-localized repair factor proteins, if repair defects do not simultaneously occur with incomplete delays in repair. In this scenario, long-lasting double-strand DNA breaks can be engineered by expressing a rare cutting endonuclease (e.g., I-SceI) in cells where the recognition site for the said enzyme has been integrated into the cellular genome. The resulting lesion is particularly hard to resolve as faithful repair will reintroduce the enzyme's recognition site, prompting another round of cleavage. As a result, differences in the kinetics of repair are eliminated. If repair complexes are not formed, localization has been impeded. This protocol describes the methodology necessary to identify changes in repair kinetics as well as repair protein localization.
DNA中双链断裂(DSB)的修复是一个高度协调的过程,需要形成和解析多蛋白修复复合物。这个过程受到众多蛋白质的调控,这些蛋白质促进蛋白质与这些损伤部位的结合和解离。很大程度上得益于对大量蛋白质文库进行功能筛选的能力,人们对双链DNA断裂修复所需的基因有了更深入的认识。通常,基因敲除或化学抑制剂筛选通过将增加的毒性作为DSB修复所需蛋白质的标志物来鉴定参与修复过程的蛋白质。尽管这对于鉴定参与维持基因组保真度的新型细胞蛋白质很有用,但功能分析需要确定感兴趣的蛋白质是否促进修复复合物的定位、形成或解析。通过免疫荧光显微镜可以很容易地将修复蛋白的积累检测为明显的核灶。因此,在双链DNA断裂诱导后,通过在代表性时间间隔观察这些核灶,可以了解这些蛋白质在DNA损伤部位的结合和解离情况。如果修复缺陷不同时伴随着修复的不完全延迟,这种方法还可以识别定位错误的修复因子蛋白。在这种情况下,可以通过在细胞中表达一种罕见的切割内切酶(如I-SceI)来构建持久的双链DNA断裂,该细胞的基因组中已整合了所述酶的识别位点。由此产生的损伤特别难以修复,因为准确的修复会重新引入酶的识别位点,从而引发另一轮切割。结果,消除了修复动力学的差异。如果没有形成修复复合物,则定位受到阻碍。本方案描述了识别修复动力学变化以及修复蛋白定位所需的方法。