Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Oct 1;57(10):1761-1768. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key154.
Recently we developed the Rasch Everyday Activity Limitations (REAL) generic item bank for measuring physical function. In this study we evaluate the REAL item bank in 209 RA patients and demonstrate how computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and Optimal Test Assembly methods can be used to derive measures from the REAL item bank with superior measurement performance compared with the HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
Structural validity of the item bank was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. The validity of the REAL score metric in RA was evaluated by examining differential item functioning against the general population calibration sample. Besides the REAL-CAT, a 6-item short form (REAL-6) was developed using Optimal Test Assembly that was optimized with respect to common disability levels in RA, content and reading ease. Measurement precision of the different instruments was examined using item response theory methods. Construct validity was evaluated by testing hypothesized correlations with external measures.
Good model-data fit was observed for a one-dimensional model and only two items showed differential item functioning of substantial magnitude. The REAL-CAT had superior measurement precision compared with HAQ-DI and REAL-6. REAL-6 outperformed HAQ-DI across all but the very lowest level of physical function. All three instruments demonstrated good construct validity (>75% of hypotheses affirmed) and only HAQ-DI had a ceiling effect (23.9%).
This study supports the validity of the REAL item bank and illustrates the potential of CAT and OTA applications based on the REAL item bank for assessing physical function in RA.
我们最近开发了用于测量身体功能的 Rasch 日常活动限制(REAL)通用项目库。本研究在 209 例 RA 患者中评估了 REAL 项目库,并展示了如何使用计算机自适应测试(CAT)和最佳测试组合方法从 REAL 项目库中得出优于健康评估问卷残疾指数(HAQ-DI)的测量性能的测量结果。
使用验证性因子分析评估项目库的结构有效性。通过检查对一般人群校准样本的差异项目功能,评估 REAL 评分指标在 RA 中的有效性。除了 REAL-CAT 外,还使用最佳测试组合开发了一种 6 项简短形式(REAL-6),该组合是针对 RA 中常见的残疾水平、内容和阅读舒适度进行优化的。使用项目反应理论方法检查不同仪器的测量精度。通过测试与外部测量的假设相关性来评估结构有效性。
观察到一维模型的良好模型数据拟合,只有两个项目显示出具有相当大差异的项目功能。REAL-CAT 与 HAQ-DI 和 REAL-6 相比具有更高的测量精度。REAL-6 在除了身体功能最低水平外的所有方面均优于 HAQ-DI。所有三种仪器都表现出良好的结构有效性(>75%的假设得到肯定),只有 HAQ-DI 存在上限效应(23.9%)。
本研究支持 REAL 项目库的有效性,并说明了基于 REAL 项目库的 CAT 和 OTA 应用在评估 RA 中的身体功能方面的潜力。