• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺癌筛查示范项目的初步成果:一项地方项目评估。

Initial results of a lung cancer screening demonstration project: a local program evaluation.

机构信息

Minneapolis Veterans Administration Health Care System (111N), 1 Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN 55417. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jun;24(6):272-277.

PMID:29939501
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe participation rates, results, and lessons learned from a lung cancer screening (LCS) demonstration project.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study at 1 of 8 centers participating in a national Veterans Health Administration LCS demonstration project.

METHODS

An electronic health record (EHR) algorithm and tobacco pack-year (TPY) information prompt identified patients potentially eligible for LCS. LCS invitation was planned to consist of shared decision-making materials, an invitation letter to call the LCS manager, a reminder letter, and an outreach phone call for nonresponders. The outreach call was subsequently dropped due to time constraints on the LCS manager. Lung nodules and incidental findings on LCS low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) were recorded in templated radiology reports and tracked with EHR notes.

RESULTS

Of 6133 potentially eligible patients, we identified 1388 patients with eligible TPY information: 918 were invited for LCS and 178 (19%) completed LCS. LCS completion was more likely in patients in the mailing-plus-call outreach group (phase I) compared with the mail-only group (phase II) (22% vs 9%; P <.001). Among those completing an LDCT, 61% had lung nodules requiring follow-up: 43% of the nodules were less than 4 mm in diameter, 12 patients required further diagnostic evaluation, and 2 had lung malignancies. There were 179 incidental LDCT findings in 116 patients, and 20% were clinically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Important considerations in LCS are accurate identification of eligible patients, balancing invitation approaches with resource constraints, and establishing standardized methods for tracking numerous small lung nodules and incidental findings detected by LDCT.

摘要

目的

描述肺癌筛查(LCS)示范项目的参与率、结果和经验教训。

研究设计

在参与国家退伍军人健康管理局 LCS 示范项目的 8 个中心之一进行的前瞻性观察研究。

方法

电子健康记录(EHR)算法和吸烟包年(TPY)信息提示确定了可能有资格进行 LCS 的患者。LCS 邀请计划包括共同决策材料、致 LCS 经理的邀请信、提醒信和未回复者的外展电话。由于 LCS 经理的时间限制,外展电话随后被取消。在 LCS 低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)上记录了肺结节和偶然发现的结果,并在模板化放射学报告和 EHR 笔记中进行了跟踪。

结果

在 6133 名潜在合格的患者中,我们确定了 1388 名具有合格 TPY 信息的患者:918 名被邀请进行 LCS,178 名(19%)完成了 LCS。在邮件加电话外展组(阶段 I)中,LCS 完成率明显高于仅邮件组(阶段 II)(22%比 9%;P<.001)。在完成 LDCT 的患者中,61%有需要随访的肺结节:43%的结节直径小于 4 毫米,12 名患者需要进一步诊断评估,2 名患者患有肺癌。在 116 名患者中发现了 179 个偶然的 LDCT 结果,其中 20%具有临床意义。

结论

在 LCS 中,重要的考虑因素是准确识别合格患者,平衡邀请方法与资源限制,并建立用于跟踪 LDCT 检测到的大量小肺结节和偶然发现的标准化方法。

相似文献

1
Initial results of a lung cancer screening demonstration project: a local program evaluation.肺癌筛查示范项目的初步成果:一项地方项目评估。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jun;24(6):272-277.
2
What factors do patients consider most important in making lung cancer screening decisions? Findings from a demonstration project conducted in the Veterans Health Administration.患者在做出肺癌筛查决策时最看重哪些因素?退伍军人健康管理局开展的一项示范项目的调查结果。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Feb;104:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
3
Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration.在退伍军人健康管理局实施肺癌筛查。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):399-406. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9022.
4
Augmented meaningful use criteria to identify patients eligible for lung cancer screening.增加有意义的使用标准,以确定有资格进行肺癌筛查的患者。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Sep;98(3):996-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.04.105. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
5
Lung Cancer Screening Before and After a Multifaceted Electronic Health Record Intervention: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.多方位电子健康记录干预措施前后的肺癌筛查:一项非随机对照试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2415383. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15383.
6
The 10 Pillars of Lung Cancer Screening: Rationale and Logistics of a Lung Cancer Screening Program.肺癌筛查的十大支柱:肺癌筛查项目的基本原理与实施安排
Radiographics. 2015 Nov-Dec;35(7):1893-908. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015150079. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
7
Factors associated with adherence to provider referrals for lung cancer screening with low dose computed tomography before and during COVID-19 pandemic.与 COVID-19 大流行前后低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查期间和之后的提供者转诊坚持相关的因素。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Aug 29;23(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11256-9.
8
Patient Navigation for Lung Cancer Screening at a Health Care for the Homeless Program: A Randomized Clinical Trial.卫生保健服务无家可归者计划中的肺癌筛查患者导航:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Aug 1;184(8):892-902. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1662.
9
Patient and Clinician Recommendations to Improve Communication and Understanding of Lung Cancer Screening Results.患者和临床医生对改善肺癌筛查结果沟通和理解的建议。
Chest. 2023 Mar;163(3):707-718. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.09.038. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
10
Barriers to Completing Low Dose Computed Tomography Scan for Lung Cancer Screening.完成低剂量计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查的障碍。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2024 Jul;25(5):424-430. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.04.014. Epub 2024 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing the Design of and Emerging Evidence for Health Care Organization-Based Lung Cancer Screening Interventions: A Systematic Review.基于医疗保健机构的肺癌筛查干预措施的设计特点与新出现的证据:一项系统综述
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Apr 25;10(1):23814683251328375. doi: 10.1177/23814683251328375. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
2
Efficacy of Interventions Intended to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.旨在提高肺癌筛查率的干预措施的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(6):1288-1296. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09097-8. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
3
Review of Interventions That Improve Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: A Cataloging of Strategies That Have Been Shown to Work (or Not).
改善肺癌筛查参与度的干预措施综述:已证明有效的(或无效的)策略目录。
Chest. 2024 Sep;166(3):632-648. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.04.019. Epub 2024 May 24.
4
Interventions Designed to Increase the Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: An Equity-Oriented Scoping Review.旨在提高肺癌筛查接受率的干预措施:一项以公平为导向的范围综述。
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2023 Feb 2;4(3):100469. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100469. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Protocol to evaluate an enterprise-wide initiative to increase access to lung cancer screening in the Veterans Health Administration.评估一项旨在增加退伍军人事务部肺癌筛查机会的全企业倡议的方案。
Clin Imaging. 2021 May;73:151-161. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.059. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
6
Association of invitation to lung cancer screening and tobacco use outcomes in a VA demonstration project.退伍军人事务部示范项目中肺癌筛查邀请与烟草使用结果的关联
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Nov 17;16:101023. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.101023. eCollection 2019 Dec.