Fu Steven S, Melzer Anne C, Fabbrini Angela E, Rice Kathryn L, Clothier Barbara, Nelson David B, Doro Elizabeth A, Partin Melissa R
Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
University of Minnesota Medical School, Department of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Nov 17;16:101023. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.101023. eCollection 2019 Dec.
A potential unintended consequence of lung cancer screening (LCS) is an adverse effect on smoking behaviors. This has been difficult to assess in previous randomized clinical trials. Our goal was to determine whether cessation and relapse behaviors differ between Veterans directly invited (DI) to participate in LCS compared to usual care (UC). We conducted a longitudinal survey of tobacco use outcomes among Veterans (Minneapolis VA) from 2014 to 2015, randomized (2:1) to DI versus UC and stratified by baseline smoking status (current/former). Within the DI group, we explored differences between those who did and did not choose to undergo LCS. A total of 979 patients (n = 660 DI, n = 319 UC) returned the survey at a median of 484 days. Among current smokers (n = 488), smoking abstinence rates and cessation attempts did not differ between DI and UC groups. More baseline smokers in DI were non-daily smokers at follow-up compared to those in UC (25.3% vs 15.6%, OR 1.97 95%CI 1.15-3.36). A significant proportion of former smokers at baseline relapsed, with 17% overall indicating past 30-day smoking. This did not differ between arms. Of those invited to LCS, smoking outcomes did not significantly differ between those who chose to be screened (161/660) versus not. This randomized program evaluation of smoking behaviors in the context of invitation to LCS observed no adverse or beneficial effects on tobacco cessation or relapse among participants invited to LCS, or among those who completed screening. As LCS programs scale and spread nationally, effective cessation programs will be essential.
肺癌筛查(LCS)一个潜在的意外后果是对吸烟行为产生不利影响。在以往的随机临床试验中,这一点很难评估。我们的目标是确定直接受邀(DI)参加LCS的退伍军人与接受常规护理(UC)的退伍军人相比,戒烟和复吸行为是否存在差异。我们对2014年至2015年期间退伍军人(明尼阿波利斯退伍军人事务部)的烟草使用结果进行了纵向调查,将他们随机(2:1)分为DI组和UC组,并按基线吸烟状况(当前/既往)进行分层。在DI组中,我们探讨了选择和未选择接受LCS的人群之间的差异。共有979名患者(n = 660名DI组,n = 319名UC组)在中位484天时回复了调查问卷。在当前吸烟者(n = 488)中,DI组和UC组的戒烟率和戒烟尝试没有差异。与UC组相比,DI组中更多的基线吸烟者在随访时为非每日吸烟者(25.3%对15.6%,OR 1.97,95%CI 1.15 - 3.36)。基线时的既往吸烟者中有很大一部分复发,总体上有17%表示过去30天内吸烟。两组之间没有差异。在受邀参加LCS的人群中,选择接受筛查的人群(161/660)与未选择接受筛查的人群之间的吸烟结果没有显著差异。在邀请参加LCS的背景下,这项关于吸烟行为的随机项目评估未观察到对受邀参加LCS的参与者或完成筛查的参与者的戒烟或复吸有不利或有益影响。随着LCS项目在全国范围内的扩大和推广,有效的戒烟项目将至关重要。