Aminoff M J, Goodin D S, Parry G J, Barbaro N M, Weinstein P R, Rosenblum M L
Neurology. 1985 Oct;35(10):1514-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.35.10.1514.
We compared the diagnostic utility of EMG, F wave and H-reflex studies, and peroneal and dermatomal SEPs in evaluating 28 patients with clinically unequivocal L-5 or S-1 compressive root lesions. The single most useful electrophysiologic technique was EMG, which often provided evidence of denervation in a myotomal pattern when other electrophysiologic findings were normal. We found abnormal late responses in 14 patients, but always in association with EMG abnormalities. Peroneal-derived SEPs were always normal. Dermatomal SEPs confirmed the diagnosis in seven patients, including two in whom other electrophysiologic studies were normal.
我们比较了肌电图(EMG)、F波和H反射检查以及腓总神经和皮节体感诱发电位(SEP)在评估28例临床诊断明确的L-5或S-1神经根受压损伤患者中的诊断效用。最有用的电生理技术是EMG,当其他电生理检查结果正常时,EMG常能提供肌节模式下神经支配缺失的证据。我们发现14例患者存在异常的迟发反应,但均与EMG异常相关。腓总神经源性SEP始终正常。皮节SEP在7例患者中确诊,其中2例患者其他电生理检查正常。