Higher Institute of Social Service of Porto (ISSSP), Av. Dr. Manuel Teixeira Ruela, 370, 4460-362 Senhora da Hora, Portugal; Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto (ICBAS.UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto (ICBAS.UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal; Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro (DEP.UA), Center for Health Techcology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Sep-Oct;78:101-113. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
Different concepts of frailty have resulted in different assessment tools covering distinct dimensions. Despite the growing recognition that there is an association between frailty and social factors, there's a lack of clarity on what is being assessed in terms of "social aspects" of frailty.
This paper provides a review of frailty assessment instruments (screening tools and severity measures) with a special focus on their social components.
Systematic review of studies published in English between 2001 and March 2018 in the PubMed database using a combination of MeSH Terms and logical operators through inclusion and exclusion criteria.
A total of 27 assessment tools including at least one social question were identified. Three instruments focuses exclusively on social frailty, whereas the weight of social dimensions in the other instruments ranges between 5% and 43%. Social activities, social support, social network, loneliness and living alone were the social concepts most represented by the social components of the various frailty instruments.
Social components of frailty vary from instrument to instrument and cover the concepts of social isolation, loneliness, social network, social support and social participation.
不同的衰弱概念导致了不同的评估工具,涵盖了不同的维度。尽管越来越多的人认识到衰弱与社会因素之间存在关联,但对于衰弱的“社会方面”评估的具体内容仍存在模糊性。
本文综述了衰弱评估工具(筛查工具和严重程度测量工具),特别关注其社会组成部分。
在 PubMed 数据库中,使用 MeSH 术语和逻辑运算符组合,通过纳入和排除标准,对 2001 年至 2018 年 3 月期间发表的英文研究进行系统综述。
共确定了 27 种评估工具,其中至少包含一个社会问题。有 3 种工具专门关注社会衰弱,而其他工具的社会维度权重在 5%至 43%之间。社会活动、社会支持、社会网络、孤独和独居是各种衰弱仪器社会组成部分所代表的社会概念。
衰弱的社会组成部分因工具而异,涵盖了社会孤立、孤独、社会网络、社会支持和社会参与等概念。