Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情期间接受居家医疗护理的老年人的衰弱评估及其对孤独感的影响

Frailty Assessment and Its Impact on Loneliness among Older Adults Receiving Home-Based Healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

作者信息

Klesiora Maria, Tsaras Konstantinos, Papathanasiou Ioanna V, Malliarou Maria, Bakalis Nikolaos, Kourkouta Lambrini, Melas Christos, Kleisiaris Christos

机构信息

Department of Nursing, University of Thessaly, Gaiopolis, 41500 Larissa, Greece.

Department of Nursing, University of Patras, 26334 Patras, Greece.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 21;12(16):1666. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161666.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the effect of frailty on loneliness among older adults receiving home care, in correlation to their socioeconomic and homebound statuses. This cross-sectional study recruited 218 individuals aged ≥65 years receiving home-based health services from the "Help at Home" program in the Region of Evrytania, Greece through an open invitation from the municipality authorities from March to June 2022. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) was used for the evaluation of frailty, the UCLA Loneliness Scale version 3 was used for loneliness, and social isolation was accessed through five questions (living alone, frequency of interaction with children, relatives, friends, and participation in social organizations). The mean age of the participants was 81.48 ± 9.06, 61.9% were female, 54.1% experienced high levels of loneliness (UCLA-3 mean 45.76 ± 11.10 [range 20-68]), and 46.3% of the participants were found to be socially isolated. Also, 58.3% of the individuals were identified as frail (TFI mean 5.95 ± 3.07) [TFI range 0-13], with 57.3% experiencing physical frailty, 43.6% experiencing psychological frailty, and 27.1% experiencing social frailty. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using UCLA-3 as the dependent variable revealed that loneliness across all domains of TFI was significantly higher in participants with frailty (total frailty [Yes] 49.27 vs. [No] 40,87 < 0.001) (physical frailty [Yes] = 48.99 vs. [No] = 41.42, < 0.001, psychological: 48.60 vs. 43.57 < 0.001, and social: 53.38 vs. 42.94 < 0.001), particularly compared to non-frail individuals, even after adjusting for potential confounding effects (covariates: gender, age, marital status, family status, living status, educational level, annual income, chronic diseases, homebound status, and social isolation). Our findings indicate that frail older adults experienced higher levels of loneliness, suggesting that frailty and loneliness are independently associated among older adults who receive home-based healthcare.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定衰弱对接受居家护理的老年人孤独感的影响,并探讨其与社会经济状况和居家状态的相关性。这项横断面研究于2022年3月至6月,通过希腊埃夫里塔尼亚地区市政当局的公开邀请,从“居家帮助”项目中招募了218名年龄≥65岁且接受居家健康服务的个体。使用蒂尔堡衰弱指标(TFI)评估衰弱状况,采用加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表第3版评估孤独感,并通过五个问题(独居情况、与子女、亲属、朋友的互动频率以及参与社会组织的情况)来评估社会隔离情况。参与者的平均年龄为81.48±9.06岁,61.9%为女性,54.1%经历高水平孤独感(UCLA-3平均分为45.76±11.10[范围20-68]),46.3%的参与者被发现存在社会隔离。此外,58.3%的个体被认定为衰弱(TFI平均分为5.95±3.07)[TFI范围0-13],其中57.3%存在身体衰弱,43.6%存在心理衰弱,27.1%存在社会衰弱。以UCLA-3作为因变量的协方差分析(ANCOVA)显示,在所有TFI领域中,衰弱参与者的孤独感显著更高(总体衰弱[是]49.27对[否]40.87,<0.001)(身体衰弱[是]=48.99对[否]=41.42,<0.001,心理方面:48.60对43.57,<0.001,社会方面:53.38对42.94,<0.001),即使在调整潜在混杂效应(协变量:性别、年龄、婚姻状况、家庭状况、居住状况、教育水平年均收入、慢性病、居家状态和社会隔离)后,与非衰弱个体相比也是如此。我们的研究结果表明,衰弱的老年人经历更高水平的孤独感,这表明在接受居家医疗保健的老年人中,衰弱和孤独感是独立相关的。

相似文献

3
A cross sectional study on the different domains of frailty for independent living older adults.
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 1;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1077-3.
4
The longitudinal relationship between loneliness, social isolation, and frailty in older adults in England: a prospective analysis.
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Feb;2(2):e70-e77. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(20)30038-6. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
5
Tailoring care for frail and lonely older people with HIV in Canada: a cross-sectional study.
Lancet HIV. 2022 Mar;9 Suppl 1:S3. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00068-6.
6
Frailty Combined with Loneliness or Social Isolation: An Elevated Risk for Mortality in Later Life.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Nov;68(11):2587-2593. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16716. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
7
Reliability and Validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator in 5 European Countries.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jun;21(6):772-779.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 May 6.
10
The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI): New Evidence for Its Validity.
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Feb 21;15:265-274. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S243233. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the living conditions and physical functioning of community-dwelling older adults.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Apr;14(4):1409-1415. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1137_24. Epub 2025 Apr 25.

本文引用的文献

5
The relationship between frailty and social vulnerability: a systematic review.
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2024 Mar;5(3):e214-e226. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(23)00263-5.
8
Frailty: A Multidimensional Biopsychosocial Syndrome.
Med Clin North Am. 2023 Jan;107(1):183-197. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
10
Nurses' Opinions on Frailty.
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 26;10(9):1632. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091632.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验