Lee Puikwan A, Greenfield Geva, Pappas Yannis
Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 26;18(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3274-8.
There is a growing body of evidence to support the use of telehealth in monitoring HbA1c levels in people living with type 2 diabetes. However, the overall magnitude of effect is yet unclear due to variable results reported in existing systematic reviews. The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials to create an evidence-base for the effectiveness of telehealth interventions on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Electronic databases including The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, HMIC, and PsychINFO were searched to identify relevant systematic reviews published between 1990 and April 2016, supplemented by references search from the relevant reviews. Two independent reviewers selected and reviewed the eligible studies. Of the 3279 references retrieved, 4 systematic reviews reporting in total 29 unique studies relevant to our review were included. Both conventional pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analyses were performed.
Evidence from pooling four systematic reviews found that telehealth interventions produced a small but significant improvement in HbA1c levels compared with usual care (MD: -0.55, 95% CI: -0.73 to - 0.36). The greatest effect was seen in telephone-delivered interventions, followed by Internet blood glucose monitoring system interventions and lastly interventions involving automatic transmission of SMBG using a mobile phone or a telehealth unit.
Current evidence suggests that telehealth is effective in controlling HbA1c levels in people living with type 2 diabetes. However there is need for better quality primary studies as well as systematic reviews of RCTs in order to confidently conclude on the impact of telehealth on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.
越来越多的证据支持使用远程医疗来监测2型糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平。然而,由于现有系统评价报告的结果存在差异,总体效果大小尚不清楚。本研究的目的是对随机对照试验的系统评价进行系统评价和荟萃分析,为远程医疗干预对2型糖尿病成年人血糖控制的有效性建立证据基础。
检索电子数据库,包括考克兰图书馆、医学索引数据库、循证医学数据库、卫生管理与信息数据库和心理学文摘数据库,以识别1990年至2016年4月发表的相关系统评价,并从相关评价中补充参考文献检索。两名独立的评审员选择并审查了符合条件的研究。在检索到的3279篇参考文献中,纳入了4篇系统评价,共报告了29项与我们的评价相关的独特研究。进行了传统的成对荟萃分析和网状荟萃分析。
汇总四项系统评价的证据发现,与常规护理相比,远程医疗干预使糖化血红蛋白水平有小幅但显著的改善(平均差:-0.55,95%置信区间:-0.73至-0.36)。最大的效果出现在电话干预中,其次是互联网血糖监测系统干预,最后是涉及使用手机或远程医疗设备自动传输自我血糖监测数据的干预。
目前的证据表明,远程医疗在控制2型糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白水平方面是有效的。然而,需要更好质量的原始研究以及对随机对照试验的系统评价,以便有信心地得出远程医疗对2型糖尿病血糖控制影响的结论。