Ahuja Manik, Aseltine Robert, Warren Nicholas, Reisine Susan, Williams Pam Holtzclaw, Cislo Andy
1Brown School of Social Work, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA.
2Center for Population Health, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06032 USA.
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Jun 14;4:113. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0307-3. eCollection 2018.
State health agencies (SHA) and local health agencies (LHA) face several challenges with the dissemination of local health data using Web-Based Data Query Systems (WDQS). To help guide future research, this study aimed to utilize expert consensus to identify the most relevant items that contribute to these challenges.
A total of 17 researchers and public health professionals agreed to participate in a three-round Delphi process. In round 1, four topics were represented on a 42-item questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale, along with free-text responses. Free-text responses were analyzed leading to a series of items for a second Delphi round. Participants were given an opportunity to revise results in round 3 for items that did not meet consensus in round 1 or round 2. Consensus on expert opinions was defined at interquartile range (IQR) ≤ 1.
The experts reached consensus on a total of 21 (50%) of the 42 items presented in the initial questionnaire. Eleven of the 15 (73%) of the items extracted from the free-text responses met consensus. Items in consensus from this pilot study were used to develop an instrument for a broader survey across Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) coordinators across all 50 US states.
Experts confirmed that software development costs, inadequate human resources, data sharing gaps, a lack of political support, and poor data quality contribute significantly to challenges in their data implementation. The findings from this pilot study inform us of items of public health significance that will help guide future research.
州卫生机构(SHA)和地方卫生机构(LHA)在使用基于网络的数据查询系统(WDQS)传播地方卫生数据方面面临若干挑战。为帮助指导未来的研究,本研究旨在利用专家共识来确定导致这些挑战的最相关项目。
共有17名研究人员和公共卫生专业人员同意参与三轮德尔菲法流程。在第一轮中,一份包含42个项目的问卷采用5点李克特量表呈现了四个主题,并附有自由文本回复。对自由文本回复进行分析,得出一系列用于第二轮德尔菲法的项目。对于在第一轮或第二轮中未达成共识的项目,参与者有机会在第三轮中修改结果。专家意见的共识定义为四分位间距(IQR)≤1。
专家们对初始问卷中列出的42个项目中的21个(50%)达成了共识。从自由文本回复中提取的15个项目中有11个(73%)达成了共识。这项试点研究中达成共识的项目被用于开发一种工具,以便对美国所有50个州的行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)协调员进行更广泛的调查。
专家们证实,软件开发成本、人力资源不足、数据共享差距、缺乏政治支持以及数据质量差是其数据实施面临挑战的重要因素。这项试点研究的结果让我们了解到具有公共卫生意义的项目,这些项目将有助于指导未来的研究。