Palomares Francisco, González-Borrajo Noa, Chávez Cuauhtémoc, Rubio Yamel, Verdade Luciano M, Monsa Rocio, Harmsen Bart, Adrados Begoña, Zanin Marina
Department of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana, CSIC, Seville, Seville, España.
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Unidad Lerma, Lerma, Estado de México, Mexico.
PeerJ. 2018 Jun 19;6:e4983. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4983. eCollection 2018.
Details of how, why and in what conditions large felids make scrapes is unknown. Here, we examined the general hypothesis about the use of scrapes for marking proposals, as well as to communicate with other individuals to signalize particular points or areas of interest, by studying scrape-marking behaviour of jaguars and pumas.
We surveyed by scrapes between five days and two months mainly during dry season in five study areas from Mexico (El Edén and San Ignacio), Belize (Cockscomb) and Brazil (Angatuba and Serra das Almas), which differed in presence and/or abundance of jaguars and pumas. Paths were slowly walked while searching for scrapes by teams normally composed of two people and tracks were stored in GPS, distinguishing the type of path surveyed (unpaved track roads, trails and cross-country).
We found a total of 269 felid scrapes along 467 km of paths surveyed, obtaining a finding rate of 0.576 scrapes per km. Most scrapes were found in car tracks (0.629 scrapes per km), followed by trails (0.581 scrapes per km), and rarely did we find scrapes in cross country (0.094 scrapes per km). In trails, scrapes were found in a similar frequency in the centre and edge, whereas in car tracks they were mainly found in the edge. There were also clear differences in the position of the scrapes between study areas that differed in presence and/or abundance of pumas and jaguars, with scrapes located mainly in the centre in areas only with pumas, in the centre and in the edge in areas with a similar number of jaguars and pumas, and in the edge in area mainly dominated by jaguars. The remarking rate tended to be higher in one of the areas with only pumas where natural vegetation was scarcer. Felids chose sites mainly covered by leaves and located in paths less wide, clean and rarely used.
Scraping was a frequent behaviour in the largest felids of America, although in some areas, scraping behaviour was rare. Scrapes seem to be signalizing some specific areas within territories and data suggest that they are made with the proposal of communication between individuals. It seems that a high scraping behaviour in pumas is not related to the presence of jaguars.
大型猫科动物如何、为何以及在何种情况下制造刮痕尚不清楚。在此,我们通过研究美洲虎和美洲狮的刮痕标记行为,检验了关于利用刮痕进行标记以及与其他个体交流以表明特定关注点或感兴趣区域的一般假设。
我们在墨西哥(埃尔埃登和圣伊格纳西奥)、伯利兹(科克斯科姆)和巴西(安加图巴和塞尔拉达斯阿尔马斯)的五个研究区域,主要在旱季的五天至两个月内对刮痕进行了调查,这些区域美洲虎和美洲狮的存在情况和/或数量有所不同。通常由两人组成的团队在缓慢行走路径的同时寻找刮痕,并将轨迹存储在全球定位系统中,区分所调查路径的类型(未铺砌的道路、小径和越野路径)。
在我们调查的467公里路径上,共发现269处猫科动物刮痕,发现率为每公里0.576处刮痕。大多数刮痕出现在车辙中(每公里0.629处刮痕),其次是小径(每公里0.581处刮痕),而在越野路径上很少发现刮痕(每公里0.094处刮痕)。在小径上,刮痕在中间和边缘出现的频率相似,而在车辙中,刮痕主要出现在边缘。在美洲狮和美洲虎的存在情况和/或数量不同的研究区域之间,刮痕的位置也存在明显差异,刮痕主要出现在仅有美洲狮的区域的中间,在美洲虎和美洲狮数量相似的区域的中间和边缘,以及主要由美洲虎主导的区域的边缘。在仅有美洲狮且自然植被较少的其中一个区域,重新标记率往往更高。猫科动物选择的地点主要被树叶覆盖,位于较窄、干净且很少使用的路径上。
刮痕行为在美洲最大的猫科动物中很常见,尽管在一些地区,刮痕行为很少见。刮痕似乎是在标记领地内的一些特定区域,数据表明它们是为了个体之间的交流而制造的。美洲狮的高刮痕行为似乎与美洲虎的存在无关。