Suppr超能文献

经皮电刺激神经疗法、手动针刺疗法和电针疗法治疗耳鸣的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

Comparison of the effectiveness between transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, manual acupuncture, and electroacupuncture on tinnitus: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Moon Young-Kyun, Kim Min Hee, Nam Hae Jeong

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology of Korean Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Ophthalmology, Otolaryngology and Dermatology of Korean Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Trials. 2018 Jun 27;19(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2738-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) involves a neuromodulatory effect using electrical stimulation and has been widely used due to its safety and convenience. It has been used for treating tinnitus for decades. Acupuncture has also been used for tinnitus and several research studies have shown that acupuncture can improve a certain kind of tinnitus by stimulating the somatosensory system. Moreover, several studies have shown the efficacy of electroacupuncture, which is a combination of acupuncture and electrical stimulation, for tinnitus. However, the comparative effectiveness of TENS, manual acupuncture, and electroacupuncture for the treatment of tinnitus has not been determined previously. Herein, we design a randomized, non-blind clinical trial to investigate and compare the effects and safety of TENS, manual acupuncture, and electroacupuncture for tinnitus.

METHODS

After screening, 45 patients are randomly assigned to three groups: (1) patients in the TENS group are treated at four sites (tender points of masseter and the sternocleidomastoid muscle, in front of tragus, and mastoid process); (2) the manual acupuncture group patients are treated at 11 acupoints (TE21, SI19, GB2, TE22, ST7, TE17, GB20 of tinnitus affected side, and GB20, TE05, KI3 of both sides); (3) electroacupuncture group patients are treated by using acupuncture as in the manual acupuncture group and electrical stimulation at TE21, SI19, TE17, and GB20. Patients are treated for ten sessions, twice a week. The primary outcome measurement is the change of Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) score between visit 1 and visit 10. The secondary outcome measurements are the response rate of THI, change in visual analogue scale associated with the loudness and annoyance of tinnitus, pure-tone audiometry and speech discrimination, and changes in parameters of heart rate variability.

DISCUSSION

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of TENS, manual acupuncture, and electroacupuncture in the auricular area on tinnitus. If the specific treatment shows a significant effect compared to other treatments, it could have potential for use in clinical practice as a primary treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), KCT0002117 . Registered October 21, 2016. Retrospectively registered.

摘要

背景

经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)涉及利用电刺激产生神经调节作用,因其安全性和便利性而被广泛应用。它已用于治疗耳鸣数十年。针灸也被用于治疗耳鸣,多项研究表明,针灸可通过刺激体感系统改善某种耳鸣。此外,多项研究已证实电针(针灸与电刺激相结合)治疗耳鸣的疗效。然而,此前尚未确定TENS、手动针灸和电针治疗耳鸣的相对有效性。在此,我们设计了一项随机、非盲临床试验,以研究和比较TENS、手动针灸和电针治疗耳鸣的效果及安全性。

方法

筛选后,45名患者被随机分为三组:(1)TENS组患者在四个部位接受治疗(咬肌和胸锁乳突肌的压痛点、耳屏前和乳突);(2)手动针灸组患者在11个穴位接受治疗(患侧耳鸣的TE21、SI19、GB2、TE22、ST7、TE17、GB20,以及双侧的GB20、TE05、KI3);(3)电针组患者采用与手动针灸组相同的针灸方法,并在TE21、SI19、TE17和GB20进行电刺激。患者接受十次治疗,每周两次。主要结局指标是第1次就诊至第10次就诊期间耳鸣障碍量表(THI)评分的变化。次要结局指标包括THI的反应率、与耳鸣响度和烦恼相关的视觉模拟量表的变化、纯音听力测定和言语辨别,以及心率变异性参数的变化。

讨论

本研究的目的是比较TENS、手动针灸和耳部电针治疗耳鸣的效果。如果特定治疗与其他治疗相比显示出显著效果,则可能有潜力在临床实践中作为主要治疗方法使用。

试验注册

临床研究信息服务(CRIS),KCT0002117。2016年10月21日注册。回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4061/6020312/c83eb00b36fb/13063_2018_2738_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验