1Public Health Consultant and Honorary Clinical Fellow,The Department of Primary Care & Public Health,Imperial College London,London,UK.
2Research Fellow,The Department of Primary Care & Public Health,Imperial College London,London,UK.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2019 Apr;14(2):249-273. doi: 10.1017/S1744133118000269. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
Inequalities in infant mortality rates (IMRs) are rising in some low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and decreasing in others, but the explanation for these divergent trends is unclear. We investigate whether government expenditures and redistribution are associated with reductions in inequalities in IMRs. We estimated country-level fixed-effects panel regressions for 48 LMICs (142 country observations). Slope and Relative Indices of Inequality in IMRs (SII and RII) were calculated from Demographic and Health Surveys between 1993 and 2013. RII and SII were regressed on government expenditure (total, health and non-health) and redistribution, controlling for gross domestic product (GDP), private health expenditures, a democracy indicator, country fixed effects and time. Mean SII and RII was 39.12 and 0.69, respectively. In multivariate models, a 1 percentage point increase in total government expenditure (% of GDP) was associated with a decrease in SII of -2.468 [95% confidence intervals (CIs): -4.190, -0.746] and RII of -0.026 (95% CIs: -0.048, -0.004). Lower inequalities were associated with higher non-health government expenditure, but not higher government health expenditure. Associations with inequalities were non-significant for GDP, government redistribution, and private health expenditure. Understanding how non-health government expenditure reduces inequalities in IMR, and why health expenditures may not, will accelerate progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals.
在一些中低收入国家(LMICs),婴儿死亡率(IMR)不平等现象正在上升,而在其他国家则在下降,但这些不同趋势的解释尚不清楚。我们研究政府支出和再分配是否与减少 IMR 不平等有关。我们对 48 个 LMIC 进行了国家层面的固定效应面板回归分析(142 个国家观测值)。从 1993 年到 2013 年的人口与健康调查中计算了 IMR 的斜率和不平等相对指数(SII 和 RII)。RII 和 SII 回归了政府支出(总支出、卫生支出和非卫生支出)和再分配,控制了国内生产总值(GDP)、私人卫生支出、民主指标、国家固定效应和时间。平均 SII 和 RII 分别为 39.12 和 0.69。在多变量模型中,政府总支出(占 GDP 的百分比)增加 1 个百分点,与 SII 下降 2.468[95%置信区间(CI):-4.190,-0.746]和 RII 下降 0.026(95%CI:-0.048,-0.004)相关。不平等程度较低与非卫生政府支出较高有关,而与政府卫生支出无关。与 GDP、政府再分配和私人卫生支出相关的不平等程度不显著。了解非卫生政府支出如何减少 IMR 不平等,以及为什么卫生支出可能不会,将加速实现可持续发展目标的进展。