• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政府支出能否降低中低收入国家婴儿死亡率的不平等?:对 1993 年至 2013 年间 48 个国家的时间序列、生态分析。

Does government expenditure reduce inequalities in infant mortality rates in low- and middle-income countries?: A time-series, ecological analysis of 48 countries from 1993 to 2013.

机构信息

1Public Health Consultant and Honorary Clinical Fellow,The Department of Primary Care & Public Health,Imperial College London,London,UK.

2Research Fellow,The Department of Primary Care & Public Health,Imperial College London,London,UK.

出版信息

Health Econ Policy Law. 2019 Apr;14(2):249-273. doi: 10.1017/S1744133118000269. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1017/S1744133118000269
PMID:29945690
Abstract

Inequalities in infant mortality rates (IMRs) are rising in some low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and decreasing in others, but the explanation for these divergent trends is unclear. We investigate whether government expenditures and redistribution are associated with reductions in inequalities in IMRs. We estimated country-level fixed-effects panel regressions for 48 LMICs (142 country observations). Slope and Relative Indices of Inequality in IMRs (SII and RII) were calculated from Demographic and Health Surveys between 1993 and 2013. RII and SII were regressed on government expenditure (total, health and non-health) and redistribution, controlling for gross domestic product (GDP), private health expenditures, a democracy indicator, country fixed effects and time. Mean SII and RII was 39.12 and 0.69, respectively. In multivariate models, a 1 percentage point increase in total government expenditure (% of GDP) was associated with a decrease in SII of -2.468 [95% confidence intervals (CIs): -4.190, -0.746] and RII of -0.026 (95% CIs: -0.048, -0.004). Lower inequalities were associated with higher non-health government expenditure, but not higher government health expenditure. Associations with inequalities were non-significant for GDP, government redistribution, and private health expenditure. Understanding how non-health government expenditure reduces inequalities in IMR, and why health expenditures may not, will accelerate progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals.

摘要

在一些中低收入国家(LMICs),婴儿死亡率(IMR)不平等现象正在上升,而在其他国家则在下降,但这些不同趋势的解释尚不清楚。我们研究政府支出和再分配是否与减少 IMR 不平等有关。我们对 48 个 LMIC 进行了国家层面的固定效应面板回归分析(142 个国家观测值)。从 1993 年到 2013 年的人口与健康调查中计算了 IMR 的斜率和不平等相对指数(SII 和 RII)。RII 和 SII 回归了政府支出(总支出、卫生支出和非卫生支出)和再分配,控制了国内生产总值(GDP)、私人卫生支出、民主指标、国家固定效应和时间。平均 SII 和 RII 分别为 39.12 和 0.69。在多变量模型中,政府总支出(占 GDP 的百分比)增加 1 个百分点,与 SII 下降 2.468[95%置信区间(CI):-4.190,-0.746]和 RII 下降 0.026(95%CI:-0.048,-0.004)相关。不平等程度较低与非卫生政府支出较高有关,而与政府卫生支出无关。与 GDP、政府再分配和私人卫生支出相关的不平等程度不显著。了解非卫生政府支出如何减少 IMR 不平等,以及为什么卫生支出可能不会,将加速实现可持续发展目标的进展。

相似文献

1
Does government expenditure reduce inequalities in infant mortality rates in low- and middle-income countries?: A time-series, ecological analysis of 48 countries from 1993 to 2013.政府支出能否降低中低收入国家婴儿死亡率的不平等?:对 1993 年至 2013 年间 48 个国家的时间序列、生态分析。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2019 Apr;14(2):249-273. doi: 10.1017/S1744133118000269. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
2
Educational and wealth inequalities in tobacco use among men and women in 54 low-income and middle-income countries.54 个低收入和中等收入国家中男女在烟草使用方面的教育和财富不平等。
Tob Control. 2018 Jan;27(1):26-34. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053266. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
3
Do Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neonatal Mortality Reflect Inequalities in Coverage of Maternal Health Services? Evidence from 48 Low- and Middle-Income Countries.新生儿死亡率中的社会经济不平等是否反映了孕产妇保健服务覆盖方面的不平等?来自48个低收入和中等收入国家的证据。
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Feb;20(2):434-46. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1841-8.
4
Social inequality in infant mortality: what explains variation across low and middle income countries?婴儿死亡率的社会不平等:低、中收入国家之间差异的原因是什么?
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jan;101:36-46. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
5
Trends in infant mortality inequalities in the Americas: 1955-1995.美洲地区1955 - 1995年婴儿死亡率不平等状况的趋势
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Jul;56(7):538-41. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.7.538.
6
Future and potential spending on health 2015-40: development assistance for health, and government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending in 184 countries.2015-2040 年的卫生未来和潜在支出:卫生发展援助,以及 184 个国家的政府、预付款私人和自费卫生支出。
Lancet. 2017 May 20;389(10083):2005-2030. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30873-5. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
7
Public financing of health in developing countries: a cross-national systematic analysis.发展中国家的卫生公共筹资:跨国系统分析。
Lancet. 2010 Apr 17;375(9723):1375-87. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60233-4. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
8
Wage inequality, the health system, and infant mortality in wealthy industrialized countries, 1970-1996.1970 - 1996年富裕工业化国家的工资不平等、卫生系统与婴儿死亡率
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jan;58(2):279-92. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00200-4.
9
An overview of health financing patterns and the way forward in the WHO African Region.世界卫生组织非洲区域卫生筹资模式概述及未来发展方向
East Afr Med J. 2006 Sep;83(9 Suppl):S1-28. doi: 10.4314/eamj.v83i9.9492.
10
Why do some countries spend more for health? An assessment of sociopolitical determinants and international aid for government health expenditures.为什么一些国家在医疗保健上投入更多?社会政治决定因素与政府医疗支出国际援助评估。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Aug;114:161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.044. Epub 2014 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the Association Between Economic Growth and Health Equity? A Cross-National Study of 83 Low- and Middle-income Countries.经济增长与健康公平之间有何关联?对83个低收入和中等收入国家的跨国研究。
Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv. 2025 May 29;55(4):27551938251345969. doi: 10.1177/27551938251345969.
2
Race and Ethnicity, Deprivation, and Infant Mortality in England, 2019-2022.2019-2022 年英格兰的种族和民族、贫困与婴儿死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2355403. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55403.
3
The influence of the Great Recession on perinatal health-an ecological study on the trend changes and regional differences in Portugal.
大衰退对围产期健康的影响——葡萄牙趋势变化与区域差异的生态研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Sep 8;34:100735. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100735. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
When do democratic transitions reduce or increase child mortality? Exploring the role of non-violent resistance.民主转型何时会降低或提高儿童死亡率?探索非暴力抵抗的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Dec;314:115459. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115459. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
5
Global trends in incidence and death of neonatal disorders and its specific causes in 204 countries/territories during 1990-2019.1990 - 2019年期间204个国家/地区新生儿疾病的发病率、死亡率及其具体病因的全球趋势。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 19;22(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12765-1.
6
Economic Crisis Impact and Social Determinants of Perinatal Outcomes and Infant Mortality in Greece.希腊的经济危机对围产结局和婴儿死亡率的影响及社会决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 11;17(18):6606. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186606.