• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前风险评估以指导预防并降低术后恶心呕吐的发生率。

Preoperative Risk Assessment to Guide Prophylaxis and Reduce the Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting.

作者信息

Thomas John Stephenson, Maple Ingrid K, Norcross William, Muckler Virginia C

出版信息

J Perianesth Nurs. 2019 Feb;34(1):74-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jopan.2018.02.007
PMID:29945846
Abstract

PURPOSE

This article describes the implementation of a postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) risk prediction and prophylaxis protocol.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective pre/post implementation quality improvement project.

METHODS

This project used chart reviews to assess the impact of the implemented PONV assessment and prophylaxis in a sample population of adult females undergoing gynecologic surgical procedures.

FINDINGS

The mean number of prophylactic antiemetics administered significantly increased during the postimplementation period from 3.64 (SD, 0.878) in the preimplementation period to 4.07 (SD, 1.021) in the postimplementation period (P < .001). The greatest increase in antiemetic administration occurred in the moderate-risk (risk score, 4) and the high-risk (risk score, 5 to 6) groups. The incidence of PONV decreased from 32.3% in the preimplementation period to 28.9% in the postimplementation period; however, this reduction did not meet statistical significance. Antiemetic administration compliance increased from 37% in the preimplementation group to 61% in the postimplementation group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this project suggest that a risk-tailored approach to PONV prophylaxis using a risk assessment tool along with treatment recommendations is effective at reducing the incidence of PONV. The effectiveness of this approach is limited by the involvement of the anesthesia providers responsible for completing the assessments and administering PONV prophylaxis.

摘要

目的

本文描述了术后恶心呕吐(PONV)风险预测与预防方案的实施情况。

设计

这是一项实施前/后回顾性质量改进项目。

方法

本项目通过病历审查,评估已实施的PONV评估与预防措施对接受妇科手术的成年女性样本群体的影响。

结果

实施后阶段预防性使用止吐药的平均数量显著增加,从实施前阶段的3.64(标准差,0.878)增至实施后阶段的4.07(标准差,1.021)(P <.001)。止吐药使用增加最多的是中度风险(风险评分4)和高风险(风险评分5至6)组。PONV的发生率从实施前阶段的32.3%降至实施后阶段的28.9%;然而,这一降低未达到统计学显著性。止吐药使用的依从性从实施前组的37%增至实施后组的61%(P <.001)。

结论

本项目结果表明,使用风险评估工具及治疗建议对PONV预防采取风险针对性方法可有效降低PONV的发生率。这种方法的有效性受到负责完成评估和实施PONV预防的麻醉医护人员参与情况的限制。

相似文献

1
Preoperative Risk Assessment to Guide Prophylaxis and Reduce the Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting.术前风险评估以指导预防并降低术后恶心呕吐的发生率。
J Perianesth Nurs. 2019 Feb;34(1):74-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
2
Implementation of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Guidelines for Female Adult Patients Undergoing Anesthesia During Gynecologic and Breast Surgery in an Ambulatory Setting.门诊环境下妇科和乳腺手术中接受麻醉的成年女性患者术后恶心呕吐指南的实施
J Perianesth Nurs. 2019 Aug;34(4):851-860. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2018.10.006. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
3
Impact of adding therapeutic recommendations to risk assessments from a prediction model for postoperative nausea and vomiting.添加治疗建议对术后恶心呕吐预测模型风险评估的影响。
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Feb;114(2):252-60. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu321. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
4
Influence of standardized orders on postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic surgery.标准化医嘱对妇科手术后恶心呕吐的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2002 Feb;36(2):210-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1A137.
5
[PONV after strabismus surgery : Risk adapted prophylaxis?].[斜视手术后的术后恶心呕吐:风险适应性预防措施?]
Anaesthesist. 2016 Jul;65(7):507-13. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0183-2. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
6
Postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing colorectal surgery within an institutional enhanced recovery after surgery protocol: comparison of two prophylactic antiemetic regimens.在机构强化康复后手术方案下接受结直肠手术的患者中的术后恶心和呕吐:两种预防性止吐方案的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Aug;72(4):344-350. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00355. Epub 2019 May 17.
7
Impact of risk assessments on prophylactic antiemetic prescription and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a cluster-randomized trial.风险评估对预防性止吐药物处方和术后恶心呕吐发生率的影响:一项集群随机试验。
Anesthesiology. 2014 Feb;120(2):343-54. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000009.
8
Prophylactic antiemetics in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a requiem?口腔颌面外科中的预防性止吐药:一曲挽歌?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Sep;67(9):1873-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.094.
9
[Postoperative nausea and vomiting: rational algorithms for prevention and treatment based on current evidence].[术后恶心呕吐:基于当前证据的预防与治疗合理算法]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2009 Apr;44(4):286-94; quiz 295. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1222437. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
10
Digital Quality Improvement Approach Reduces the Need for Rescue Antiemetics in High-Risk Patients: A Comparative Effectiveness Study Using Interrupted Time Series and Propensity Score Matching Analysis.数字化质量改进方法降低高危患者需要急救止吐药物的概率:一项使用中断时间序列和倾向评分匹配分析的比较有效性研究。
Anesth Analg. 2019 May;128(5):867-876. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003828.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and associated factors of intraoperative Nausea and Vomiting of mothers who gave birth with cesarean section under regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis; 2023.区域麻醉下剖宫产分娩产妇术中恶心呕吐的患病率及相关因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析;2023年
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07363-z.
2
Management strategies for the treatment and prevention of postoperative/postdischarge nausea and vomiting: an updated review.术后/出院后恶心呕吐的治疗与预防管理策略:最新综述
F1000Res. 2020 Aug 13;9. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21832.1. eCollection 2020.