Suppr超能文献

中期可吸收单丝用于胃肠吻合术是安全有效的——PROMEGAT——一项单臂前瞻性观察研究。

Mid-term absorbable monofilament is safe and effective for gastrointestinal anastomosis - PROMEGAT - A single-arm prospective observational study.

作者信息

Baumann Petra, Kim Jongwon, Ahn Sang-Hoon, Kim Hyung-Ho, Chong Hoong-Yin, Wente Moritz N

机构信息

Aesculap AG, Medical Scientific Affairs, 78532, Tuttlingen, Germany.

GangNam Severance Hospital, Department of Surgery, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2018 Apr 6;30:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.04.003. eCollection 2018 Jun.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Various suture materials and suture techniques are used to perform gastrointestinal anastomosis after tumour resection, but the best combination is still a matter of debate.

METHODS

This multi-centre, international, single-arm, prospective observational study aimed at demonstrating the non-inferiority of a mid-term absorbable monofilament in comparison to braided sutures in gastrointestinal anastomosis. Monosyn suture was used to create the gastrointestinal anastomosis and the frequency of anastomotic leakage until day of discharge was chosen as the primary parameter. The outcome was compared to the results published for braided sutures in the literature. Secondary parameters were the time to perform the anastomosis, length of hospital stay, costs, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The anastomosis leakage rate was 2.91%, indicating that Monosyn suture was not inferior to braided sutures used in gastrointestinal anastomosis. Of the reported anastomotic suture techniques, the single layer continuous method was the fastest and most economical technique in the present observational study.

CONCLUSION

Monosyn suture is safe and effective in gastrointestinal anastomosis and represents a good alternative to other sutures used for gastrointestinal anastomosis. With regard to safety, time and cost-efficiency, the single-layer continuous technique should be considered a preferred method. The transfer of results from clinical studies into daily practice with regard to surgical techniques for gastrointestinal anastomosis should be further evaluated in larger studies or in nationwide registries.

摘要

引言

肿瘤切除术后进行胃肠道吻合术时会使用各种缝合材料和缝合技术,但最佳组合仍存在争议。

方法

这项多中心、国际性、单臂、前瞻性观察性研究旨在证明在胃肠道吻合术中,中期可吸收单丝缝线相对于编织缝线的非劣效性。使用单丝缝线(Monosyn缝线)进行胃肠道吻合,并将直至出院时的吻合口漏发生率作为主要参数。将结果与文献中报道的编织缝线的结果进行比较。次要参数包括吻合操作时间、住院时间、费用和术后并发症。

结果

吻合口漏发生率为2.91%,表明Monosyn缝线在胃肠道吻合术中并不劣于编织缝线。在所报道的吻合缝合技术中,单层连续缝合法是本观察性研究中最快且最经济的技术。

结论

Monosyn缝线在胃肠道吻合术中安全有效,是用于胃肠道吻合的其他缝线的良好替代选择。在安全性、时间和成本效益方面,单层连续技术应被视为首选方法。关于胃肠道吻合术手术技术的临床研究结果向日常实践的转化,应在更大规模的研究或全国性登记中进一步评估。

相似文献

9

本文引用的文献

4
5
Single layer versus double layer suture anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract.胃肠道单层与双层缝合吻合术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD005477. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005477.pub4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验