Goldbergova M Pavkova, Lipkova J, Fedorko J, Sevcikova J, Parenica J, Spinar J, Masarik M, Vasku A
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2018;119(6):341-347. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2018_064.
Levels of circulating miRNA are considered to be potential biomarkers of acute myocardial infarction and disease progression.
In this study, the expression levels of circulating miRNA-1, miRNA-133 and miRNA-124a were investigated in a group of patients with acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS) compared to controls.
During the hospitalization period, miRNA-133 showed a significant up-regulation in the serum of STEMI and CS patients compared to controls, while the expression of miRNA-1 was significantly different only in CS. The expression of miRNA-124 was significantly higher in STEMI and CS. Furthermore, miRNA-1 expression was related to the level of circulating glucose in patients with STEMI. We also found a negative correlation between miRNA-133 and MMP-9 levels. MiRNA-124 expression was significantly related to the level of soluble ST2; the marker correlated to cardiac damage.
All selected miRNAs are potential markers of cardiac injury in cardiogenic shock, whereas miRNA-124a and -133 are markers of injury in STEMI. MiRNA-1 expression is related to circulating glucose in STEMI. None of miRNAs could be correlated to the extent of injury, progress of the disease, or prognosis of patient outcome. Therefore, the levels of circulating miRNA have no potential for becoming a biomarker of myocardial damage and as such would bring no further benefit compared to current markers (Tab. 4, Fig. 1, Ref. 47).
循环miRNA水平被认为是急性心肌梗死和疾病进展的潜在生物标志物。
在本研究中,与对照组相比,对一组急性心肌梗死(STEMI)和心源性休克(CS)患者的循环miRNA-1、miRNA-133和miRNA-124a的表达水平进行了研究。
在住院期间,与对照组相比,STEMI和CS患者血清中的miRNA-133显著上调,而miRNA-1的表达仅在CS中存在显著差异。STEMI和CS中miRNA-124的表达显著更高。此外,STEMI患者中miRNA-1的表达与循环葡萄糖水平相关。我们还发现miRNA-133与MMP-9水平呈负相关。miRNA-124的表达与可溶性ST2水平显著相关;该标志物与心脏损伤相关。
所有选定的miRNA都是心源性休克中心脏损伤的潜在标志物,而miRNA-124a和-133是STEMI中损伤的标志物。STEMI中miRNA-1的表达与循环葡萄糖相关。没有一种miRNA与损伤程度、疾病进展或患者预后相关。因此,循环miRNA水平没有成为心肌损伤生物标志物的潜力,与当前标志物相比不会带来更多益处(表4,图1,参考文献47)。