• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿肠套叠与空气灌肠复位后的早期出院

Pediatric intussusception and early discharge after pneumatic reduction.

作者信息

Okumus Mustafa, Emektar Ali

机构信息

a Department of Pediatric Surgery , Yeniyüzyıl University, Faculty ofMedicine, Gaziosmanpaşa Hospital and Bahat Hospital , Istanbul , Turkey.

b Department of Radiology , Bahat Hospital , Istanbul , Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Chir Belg. 2019 Jun;119(3):162-165. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2018.1487190. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1080/00015458.2018.1487190
PMID:29947299
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The success of non-operative reduction methods is extremely high in pediatric intussusceptions. Recurrent intussusceptions are also well-known entities in the pediatric age group after non-operative and operative reduction. Historical recommendations include a 24- to 48-h observation period after reduction. This situation often leads to unnecessary time loss. We aimed to show that early discharge does not pose a significant risk.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who presented to our hospital between January 2008 and June 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included age, clinical presentation, procedural information, surgical intervention, hospital stay, and presence of recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients were included the study. Non-operative reduction was successful in 58 of 62 patients (93.5%). Four patients with failed non-operative reduction underwent subsequent surgical procedures. All patients were allowed oral intake within 2-4 h (mean: 2.6 h) after successful non-operative reduction and discharged within 5-8 h (mean: 6.2 h) after reduction. There were five episodes of recurrence and none occurred in the first 48 h after reduction. All recurrences were treated with non-operative reduction as in the first attempt. There were no problems detected in short- or long-term follow-ups.

CONCLUSION

Pneumatic reduction is a safe and effective method in pediatric intussusception. If one is confident about treatment success, patients can be discharged without a long observation period. Early discharge is also cost-effective and reduces time loss.

摘要

目的

非手术复位方法在小儿肠套叠中的成功率极高。复发性肠套叠在小儿年龄组中也是非手术和手术复位后常见的情况。以往的建议包括复位后观察24至48小时。这种情况常常导致不必要的时间浪费。我们旨在表明早期出院不会带来重大风险。

方法

回顾性分析2008年1月至2017年6月期间我院收治患者的病历。收集的数据包括年龄、临床表现、操作信息、手术干预、住院时间和复发情况。

结果

本研究共纳入62例患者。62例患者中有58例非手术复位成功(93.5%)。4例非手术复位失败的患者随后接受了手术治疗。所有患者在非手术复位成功后2至4小时内(平均:2.6小时)开始经口进食,并在复位后5至8小时内(平均:6.2小时)出院。有5例复发,且均未在复位后的前48小时内发生。所有复发均如首次尝试一样采用非手术复位治疗。短期和长期随访均未发现问题。

结论

空气灌肠复位是小儿肠套叠的一种安全有效的方法。如果对治疗成功有信心,患者无需长时间观察即可出院。早期出院也具有成本效益,并减少了时间浪费。

相似文献

1
Pediatric intussusception and early discharge after pneumatic reduction.小儿肠套叠与空气灌肠复位后的早期出院
Acta Chir Belg. 2019 Jun;119(3):162-165. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2018.1487190. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
2
A randomized trial of pneumatic reduction versus hydrostatic reduction for intussusception in pediatric patients.小儿肠套叠空气灌肠复位与水压灌肠复位的随机试验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Aug;53(8):1464-1468. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
3
Air contrast enema reduction of single and recurrent ileocolic intussusceptions in children: patterns, management and outcomes.空气对比灌肠在儿童单发和复发性回肠-结肠肠套叠中的应用:模式、处理和结果。
Pediatr Radiol. 2020 May;50(5):664-672. doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04612-5. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
4
Intussusception patients older than 1 year tend to have early recurrence after pneumatic enema reduction.1岁以上的肠套叠患者在空气灌肠复位后往往会早期复发。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2015 Sep;31(9):855-8. doi: 10.1007/s00383-015-3726-8. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
5
Age at presentation and management of pediatric intussusception: A Pediatric Health Information System database study.小儿肠套叠的就诊年龄及治疗:一项儿科健康信息系统数据库研究。
Surgery. 2017 Apr;161(4):995-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.030. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
6
Effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction for children with acute intussusception.超声引导下水压灌肠复位术治疗小儿急性肠套叠的有效性和安全性。
Sci Prog. 2021 Jul-Sep;104(3):368504211040911. doi: 10.1177/00368504211040911.
7
Indications for repeated enema reduction of intussusception in children.小儿肠套叠反复灌肠复位的适应证。
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2014 May-Jun;142(5-6):320-4. doi: 10.2298/sarh1406320v.
8
Delayed repeated enema and operative findings after unsuccessful primary enema for intussusception.肠套叠首次灌肠未成功后的延迟重复灌肠及手术发现。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Oct;22(5):404-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1315804. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
9
Is it safe to discharge intussusception patients after successful hydrostatic reduction?水压复位成功后肠套叠患者是否可以安全出院?
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jun;45(6):1182-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.085.
10
Recurrent intussusception: safe use of hydrostatic enema.复发性肠套叠:水压灌肠的安全应用
J Pediatr Surg. 1996 Jun;31(6):859-61. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90154-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a Nomogram for Predicting Surgical Intervention in Pediatric Intussusception After Pneumatic Reduction: A Multicenter Study from China.开发用于预测小儿肠套叠空气灌肠复位术后手术干预的列线图:一项来自中国的多中心研究
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2024 May 24;20:313-323. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S463086. eCollection 2024.
2
Management of intussusception in children: A systematic review.小儿肠套叠的治疗:系统评价。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Mar;56(3):587-596. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.09.055. Epub 2020 Oct 6.