Arthur Elizabeth K, Wills Celia E, Menon Usha
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Ohio State University.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2018 Jul 2;45(4):469-482. doi: 10.1188/18.ONF.469-482.
Treatments for cancer in the lower pelvis often cause lasting effects on women's sexual well-being. The purpose of this review is to describe interventions to improve sexual well-being in gynecologic, anal, or rectal cancer survivors.
This review follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2009 checklist and guidelines. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL®, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library.
Articles were original intervention research studies of women treated for gynecologic, anal, or rectal cancer and included sexual well-being outcomes. Study characteristics were extracted and compared in a table for analysis and synthesis.
Of the 16 included studies, 1 focused on genitourinary rehabilitation, 12 focused on psychoeducational interventions, and 3 focused on combination interventions. Most interventions reported at least one positive sexual well-being outcome. Intervention format, delivery, dose, and outcome variables varied widely.
Preliminary efficacy and feasibility of interventions are promising, but larger studies designed to discern optimal content, delivery format, dose, and timing are needed.
盆腔下部癌症的治疗常常会对女性的性健康产生持久影响。本综述的目的是描述改善妇科、肛门或直肠癌幸存者性健康的干预措施。
本综述遵循2009年PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)清单和指南。使用PubMed、CINAHL®、PsycINFO和Cochrane图书馆进行文献检索。
文章为针对妇科、肛门或直肠癌女性患者的原始干预研究,并包括性健康结果。提取研究特征并在表格中进行比较,以进行分析和综合。
在纳入的16项研究中,1项关注泌尿生殖系统康复,12项关注心理教育干预,3项关注联合干预。大多数干预措施报告了至少一项积极的性健康结果。干预形式、实施方式、剂量和结果变量差异很大。
干预措施的初步疗效和可行性很有前景,但需要开展更大规模的研究来确定最佳内容、实施形式、剂量和时机。