Suppr超能文献

关节镜辅助下带或不带部分肩袖修复的背阔肌转位治疗不可修复的后上方肩袖撕裂的比较。

Comparison of arthroscopically assisted transfer of the latissimus dorsi with or without partial cuff repair for irreparable postero-superior rotator cuff tear.

机构信息

Paris Shoulder Unit, Clinique Bizet, 21, rue Georges Bizet, 75116, Paris, France.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2019 Feb;43(2):387-394. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4016-6. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of an additional partial repair in combination with an arthroscopically assisted transfer of the latissimus dorsi (LDT) in massive postero-superior irreparable cuff tear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients (mean age 59.2 years) scheduled for arthroscopically assisted LDT either isolated or in combination with a partial cuff repair for a massive posterior-superior cuff tear were prospectively included between January 2011 and December 2013 at our institution. Seventeen had an isolated transfer (Group A) and 14 had a transfer combined with a partial cuff repair (Group B). Outcome measures included visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion, strength, constant score, and subjective shoulder value (SSV). Potential predictive factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up (mean 22 months), patients in Group B had a significantly higher constant score (64 ± 8 versus 58 ± 4 in Group A), range of motion (33 ± 5 versus 29 ± 5 points in Group A), and strength at 90° of abduction (2.5 kg ± 1 in Group B versus 1.9 kg ± 0.9 in Group A). No significant differences were found between both groups regarding pain scores, SSV, and active external rotation. Thirty-seven variables were analyzed and the only factor which was found to be predictive of a bad result was a preoperative SSV < 40 pts. (RR 0.5).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopically assisted LDT gives better results when combined with a partial repair of the cuff than when it is performed isolated in the treatment of massive irreparable postero-superior rotator cuff tear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Treatment study, Level II.

摘要

目的

评估在巨大的后上方不可修复肩袖撕裂中,附加部分修复与关节镜辅助背阔肌(LDT)转移相结合的效果。

材料和方法

2011 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月,我院前瞻性纳入 31 例(平均年龄 59.2 岁)拟行关节镜辅助 LDT 治疗的患者,这些患者均为巨大后上方肩袖撕裂,分为单纯 LDT 转移组(A 组)和 LDT 转移联合部分肩袖修复组(B 组)。评估指标包括视觉模拟评分(VAS)、活动范围、力量、Constant 评分和主观肩部值(SSV)。分析潜在的预测因素。

结果

末次随访(平均 22 个月)时,B 组患者的 Constant 评分(64 ± 8 分比 A 组的 58 ± 4 分)、活动范围(33 ± 5 分比 A 组的 29 ± 5 分)和外展 90°时的力量(B 组 2.5 kg ± 1 比 A 组 1.9 kg ± 0.9)均显著更高。两组患者在疼痛评分、SSV 和主动外旋方面无显著差异。分析了 37 个变量,发现唯一与预后不良相关的因素是术前 SSV < 40 分(RR 0.5)。

结论

在治疗巨大不可修复后上方肩袖撕裂时,与单纯 LDT 治疗相比,关节镜辅助 LDT 联合部分肩袖修复的效果更好。

证据等级

治疗研究,II 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验