Serrano-Sánchez Rafael Fernando, Colina Ortega Arnovis, Piña Quintero Ana Marcela, Giraldo-Cadavid Luis F
Orthopedic Surgeon and Traumatologist, Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario Mederi and Los Cobos Medical Center, Bogotá, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
Orthopedic Surgeon and Traumatologist, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Shoulder Elbow. 2025 Aug 13:17585732251366840. doi: 10.1177/17585732251366840.
Massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) pose clinical and surgical challenges due to tendon retraction, fatty infiltration, muscle atrophy, and poor tissue quality. Nonarthroplasty options have emerged as alternatives to shoulder arthroplasty.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies evaluating nonarthroplasty surgical treatments for MRCTs. We searched PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, and Google Scholar, including studies with at least 12 months of follow up. Functional outcomes, range of motion, and complication rates were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I.
Twenty-one studies (n = 1036 patients) were included, evaluating partial repair, tendon transfers, superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), debridement, augmentation, and subacromial balloon spacers. All techniques showed functional improvement and pain reduction. Partial repair showed better external rotation than augmentation. Tendon transfers and SCR yielded similar functional outcomes. Augmentations had the highest complication rate (33%), while debridement the lowest (10%). These findings may reflect differences in baseline pathology severity and the relative complexity of the surgical techniques.
Nonarthroplasty surgical options for MRCTs provide significant functional gains and pain relief. No technique demonstrated clear superiority. Overall evidence quality was low, highlighting the need for future high-quality comparative studies to optimize treatment strategies.
巨大的不可修复的后上盂唇肌腱撕裂(MRCT)由于肌腱回缩、脂肪浸润、肌肉萎缩和组织质量差而带来临床和手术挑战。非关节成形术已成为肩关节置换术的替代选择。
我们对评估MRCT非关节成形术手术治疗的比较研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。我们检索了PubMed、LILACS、Scopus和谷歌学术,纳入至少随访12个月的研究。提取功能结果、活动范围和并发症发生率。使用ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险。
纳入21项研究(n = 1036例患者),评估了部分修复、肌腱转移、上盂唇重建(SCR)、清创、增强和肩峰下球囊间隔器。所有技术均显示功能改善和疼痛减轻。部分修复在外旋方面比增强表现更好。肌腱转移和SCR产生相似的功能结果。增强的并发症发生率最高(33%),而清创最低(10%)。这些发现可能反映了基线病理严重程度的差异以及手术技术的相对复杂性。
MRCT的非关节成形术手术选择可带来显著的功能改善和疼痛缓解。没有一种技术显示出明显的优越性。总体证据质量较低,突出了未来进行高质量比较研究以优化治疗策略的必要性。