Suppr超能文献

心室心肌脂肪:长期生存的意外生物标志物?

Ventricular Myocardial Fat: An Unexpected Biomarker for Long-term Survival?

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 East 210th St, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.

Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., PO Box 208042, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):241-250. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5546-4. Epub 2018 Jun 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the association between myocardial fat, a poorly understood finding frequently observed on non-contrast CT, and all-cause mortality in patients with and without a history of prior MI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort from a diverse urban academic center was derived from chronic myocardial infarction (MI) patients (n = 265) and three age-matched patients without MI (n = 690) who underwent non-contrast chest CT between 1 January 2005-31 December 2008. CT images were reviewed for left and right ventricular fat. Electronic records identified clinical variables. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses assessed the association between myocardial fat and all-cause mortality. The net reclassification improvement assessed the utility of adding myocardial fat to traditional risk prediction models.

RESULTS

Mortality was 40.1% for the no MI and 71.7% for the MI groups (median follow-up, 6.8 years; mean age, 73.7 ± 10.6 years). In the no MI group, 25.7% had LV and 49.9% RV fat. In the MI group, 32.8% had LV and 42.3% RV fat. LV and RV fat was highly associated (OR 5.3, p < 0.001). Ventricular fat was not associated with cardiovascular risk factors. Myocardial fat was associated with a reduction in the adjusted hazard of death for both the no MI (25%, p = 0.04) and the MI group (31%, p = 0.018). Myocardial fat resulted in the correct reclassification of 22% for the no MI group versus the Charlson score or calcium score (p = 0.004) and 47% for the MI group versus the Charlson score (p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with myocardial fat have better survival, regardless of MI status, suggesting that myocardial fat is a beneficial biomarker and may improve risk stratification.

KEY POINTS

• Myocardial fat is commonly found on chest CT, yet is poorly understood • Myocardial fat is associated with better survival in patients with and without prior MI and is not associated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors • This finding may provide clinically meaningful prognostic value in the risk stratification of patients.

摘要

目的

探讨心肌脂肪与既往心肌梗死(MI)史患者和无 MI 史患者全因死亡率之间的关系。

材料和方法

从一个多元化的城市学术中心的回顾性队列中,选取了 265 例慢性 MI 患者(MI 组)和 690 例年龄匹配的无 MI 患者(无 MI 组),这些患者于 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 12 月 31 日期间接受了非对比性胸部 CT 检查。对左、右心室脂肪进行 CT 图像复查。电子病历记录了临床变量。Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 比例风险分析评估了心肌脂肪与全因死亡率之间的关系。净重新分类改善评估了将心肌脂肪添加到传统风险预测模型中的效用。

结果

无 MI 组的死亡率为 40.1%,MI 组的死亡率为 71.7%(中位随访时间为 6.8 年;平均年龄为 73.7±10.6 岁)。无 MI 组中,25.7%有左心室脂肪,49.9%有右心室脂肪。MI 组中,32.8%有左心室脂肪,42.3%有右心室脂肪。左、右心室脂肪高度相关(OR 5.3,p<0.001)。心室脂肪与心血管危险因素无关。心肌脂肪与无 MI 组(降低 25%,p=0.04)和 MI 组(降低 31%,p=0.018)的死亡调整后危险比降低相关。与 Charlson 评分或钙评分相比,心肌脂肪导致无 MI 组正确重新分类的比例增加了 22%(p=0.004),与 Charlson 评分相比,MI 组增加了 47%(p=0.0006)。

结论

无论 MI 状态如何,有心肌脂肪的患者的存活率更好,这表明心肌脂肪是一种有益的生物标志物,可能改善风险分层。

重点

• 心肌脂肪在胸部 CT 上很常见,但了解甚少。• 心肌脂肪与有既往 MI 史和无 MI 史患者的生存状况较好相关,与传统心血管危险因素无关。• 这一发现可能为患者的风险分层提供有临床意义的预后价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验