Suppr超能文献

2011-2015 年马萨诸塞州潜在不适当阿片类药物处方、用药过量和死亡率。

Potentially Inappropriate Opioid Prescribing, Overdose, and Mortality in Massachusetts, 2011-2015.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Boston, MA, USA.

Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1512-1519. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4532-5. Epub 2018 Jun 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) may contribute to opioid overdose.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between PIP and adverse events.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Three million seventy-eight thousand thirty-four individuals age ≥ 18, without disseminated cancer, who received prescription opioids between 2011 and 2015.

MAIN MEASURES

We defined PIP as (a) morphine equivalent dose ≥ 100 mg/day in ≥ 3 months; (b) overlapping opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions in ≥ 3 months; (c) ≥ 4 opioid prescribers in any quarter; (d) ≥ 4 opioid-dispensing pharmacies in any quarter; (e) cash purchase of prescription opioids on ≥ 3 occasions; and (f) receipt of opioids in 3 consecutive months without a documented pain diagnosis. We used Cox proportional hazards models to identify PIP practices associated with non-fatal opioid overdose, fatal opioid overdose, and all-cause mortality, controlling for covariates.

KEY RESULTS

All six types of PIP were associated with higher adjusted hazard for all-cause mortality, four of six with non-fatal overdose, and five of six with fatal overdose. Lacking a documented pain diagnosis was associated with non-fatal overdose (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.02-2.41), as was high-dose opioids (AHR 1.68, 95% CI 1.59-1.76). Co-prescription of benzodiazepines was associated with fatal overdose (AHR 4.23, 95% CI 3.85-4.65). High-dose opioids were associated with all-cause mortality (AHR 2.18, 95% CI 2.14-2.23), as was lacking a documented pain diagnosis (AHR 2.05, 95% CI 2.01-2.09). Compared to those who received opioids without PIP, the hazard for fatal opioid overdose with one, two, three, and ≥ four PIP subtypes were 4.24, 7.05, 10.28, and 12.99 (test of linear trend, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PIP was associated with higher hazard for all-cause mortality, fatal overdose, and non-fatal overdose. Our study implies the possibility of creating a risk score incorporating multiple PIP subtypes, which could be displayed to prescribers in real time.

摘要

背景

潜在不适当处方(PIP)可能导致阿片类药物过量。

目的

研究 PIP 与不良事件之间的关联。

设计

队列研究。

参与者

年龄≥18 岁、无转移性癌症且在 2011 年至 2015 年期间接受处方类阿片药物的 307.834 名个体。

主要措施

我们将 PIP 定义为:(a) 3 个月内吗啡等效剂量≥100mg/天;(b) 3 个月内重叠使用阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物处方;(c) 任何一个季度有≥4 名开具阿片类药物的医生;(d) 任何一个季度有≥4 家分发阿片类药物的药店;(e) 3 次或以上现金购买处方类阿片药物;(f) 在连续 3 个月内没有记录到疼痛诊断但仍收到阿片类药物。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型,在控制了协变量后,确定与非致命性阿片类药物过量、致命性阿片类药物过量和全因死亡率相关的 PIP 实践。

主要结果

所有六种类型的 PIP 均与全因死亡率的调整后更高的危险比相关,六种中的四种与非致命性过量相关,六种中的五种与致命性过量相关。缺乏记录的疼痛诊断与非致命性过量相关(调整后的危险比[AHR] 2.21,95%置信区间[CI] 2.02-2.41),高剂量阿片类药物也与非致命性过量相关(AHR 1.68,95% CI 1.59-1.76)。苯二氮䓬类药物的共同处方与致命性过量相关(AHR 4.23,95% CI 3.85-4.65)。高剂量阿片类药物与全因死亡率相关(AHR 2.18,95% CI 2.14-2.23),缺乏记录的疼痛诊断也与全因死亡率相关(AHR 2.05,95% CI 2.01-2.09)。与没有 PIP 的患者相比,存在一种、两种、三种和≥四种 PIP 亚型的致命性阿片类药物过量的风险比分别为 4.24、7.05、10.28 和 12.99(线性趋势检验,p<0.001)。

结论

PIP 与全因死亡率、致命性过量和非致命性过量的风险增加相关。我们的研究表明,有可能创建一个包含多种 PIP 亚型的风险评分,并可以实时显示给开处方的医生。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value.观察性研究中的敏感性分析:引入 E 值。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 15;167(4):268-274. doi: 10.7326/M16-2607. Epub 2017 Jul 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验