Division of Women's Health, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Wuqu' Kawoq | Maya Health Alliance, Santiago Sacatepéquez, Guatemala.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 27;13(6):e0199536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199536. eCollection 2018.
In many low-resource settings around the world utilization of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is low, in part due to access barriers. We sought to explore LARC utilization patterns as well as factors associated with LARC initiation by women seeking contraception in rural Guatemala from a program working to reduce contraception access barriers.
We analyzed data from a program that provides family planning in six remote, primarily indigenous, villages in Guatemala with limited access to alternative health services. Methods are free and delivered directly within villages by culturally competent providers. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all 288 women who initiated a contraceptive method over a 16-month period and conducted a logistic regression to obtain adjusted odds ratios (OR) for predictors of LARC uptake.
Overall 79.2% of women elected a LARC method. More than half of women (49.8%) switched to LARC from short-acting hormonal methods. In the univariate analysis prior use of short-acting method (p = 0.014), number of prior methods (p = 0.049), and current contraceptive use (p<0.01) were significantly associated with choosing a LARC. In the logistic regression model current use of contraception remained significant (OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.67-8.04). Report of abnormal bleeding or other side effects from prior short-acting method use did not predict LARC uptake (p = 0.82 and p = 0.079).
Most women in this marginalized population opted for a LARC method.
Low utilization of LARCs may be related to service delivery factors. Further research is needed to validate these conclusions prospectively and in less selected populations.
在世界上许多资源匮乏的环境中,长效可逆避孕措施(LARC)的利用率较低,部分原因是获取途径有限。我们试图探索在危地马拉农村地区,一个旨在减少避孕获取障碍的项目中寻求避孕的妇女使用 LARC 的模式以及与 LARC 起始相关的因素。
我们分析了一个在危地马拉六个偏远、主要是土著的村庄提供计划生育服务的项目的数据,这些村庄获得替代医疗服务的机会有限。方法是免费的,并由具有文化能力的提供者直接在村庄内提供。我们对在 16 个月期间开始使用避孕方法的 288 名妇女的所有病历进行了回顾性图表审查,并进行了逻辑回归分析,以获得 LARC 使用率的调整优势比(OR)。
总体而言,79.2%的妇女选择了 LARC 方法。超过一半的妇女(49.8%)从短效激素方法转为 LARC。在单变量分析中,先前使用短效方法(p=0.014)、先前使用方法的数量(p=0.049)和当前避孕使用(p<0.01)与选择 LARC 显著相关。在逻辑回归模型中,当前避孕使用仍然显著(OR 3.29,95%CI 1.67-8.04)。报告先前使用短效方法有异常出血或其他副作用并没有预测 LARC 的使用(p=0.82 和 p=0.079)。
这个边缘化人群中的大多数妇女选择了 LARC 方法。
LARCs 的低利用率可能与服务提供因素有关。需要进一步的研究来前瞻性地和在选择较少的人群中验证这些结论。