1Section of Infectious Disease and International Health,Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center,Lebanon,New Hampshire.
2Department of Population Medicine,Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute,Boston,Massachusetts.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;39(8):897-901. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.137. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
In 2008, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) stopped reimbursing for hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) not present on admission (POA). We sought to understand why this policy did not impact central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) trends.
Retrospective cohort study.
Acute-care hospitals in the United States.ParticipantsFee-for-service Medicare patients discharged January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2011.
Using inpatient Medicare claims data, we analyzed billing practices before and after the HAC policy was implemented, including the use and POA designation of codes for CLABSI or CAUTI. For the 3-year period following policy implementation, we determined the impact on diagnosis-related groups (DRG) determining reimbursement as well as hospital characteristics associated with the reimbursement impact.
During the study period, 65,205,607 Medicare fee-for-service hospitalizations occurred at 3,291 acute-care, nonfederal US hospitals. Based on coding, CLABSI and CAUTI affected 0.23% and 0.06% of these hospitalizations, respectively. In addition, following the HAC policy, 82% of the CLABSI codes and 91% of the CAUTI codes were marked POA, which represented a large increase in the use of this designation. Finally, for the small numbers of CLABSI and CAUTI coded as not POA, financial impacts were detected on only 0.4% of the hospitalizations with a CLABSI code and 5.7% with a CAUTI code.
Part of the reason the HAC policy did not have its intended impact is that billing codes for CLABSI and CAUTI were rarely used, were commonly listed as POA in the postpolicy period, and infrequently impacted hospital reimbursement.
2008 年,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)停止报销入院时不存在的医院获得性疾病(HAC)。我们试图了解为什么该政策没有影响中心静脉相关血流感染(CLABSI)和导管相关尿路感染(CAUTI)的趋势。
回顾性队列研究。
美国的急症护理医院。
2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 12 月 31 日出院的按服务收费的 Medicare 患者。
使用住院 Medicare 索赔数据,我们分析了 HAC 政策实施前后的计费实践,包括 CLABSI 或 CAUTI 代码的使用和入院时情况的指定。在政策实施后的 3 年期间,我们确定了其对诊断相关组(DRG)确定报销的影响以及与报销影响相关的医院特征。
在研究期间,3291 家美国非联邦急症护理医院共发生了 65205607 例 Medicare 按服务收费的住院治疗。根据编码,CLABSI 和 CAUTI 分别影响了这些住院治疗的 0.23%和 0.06%。此外,在 HAC 政策之后,82%的 CLABSI 代码和 91%的 CAUTI 代码被标记为入院时情况,这代表了这种指定的大量使用。最后,对于少数未被标记为入院时情况的 CLABSI 和 CAUTI 编码,仅在 0.4%的 CLABSI 编码住院和 5.7%的 CAUTI 编码住院中发现了财务影响。
HAC 政策没有产生预期影响的部分原因是 CLABSI 和 CAUTI 的计费代码很少使用,在政策后时期通常被列为入院时情况,并且很少影响医院报销。