Lübbeke Anne
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland; Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK.
EFORT Open Rev. 2018 May 21;3(5):160-167. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170064. eCollection 2018 May.
Since improving the patient's condition is the ultimate goal of clinical care and research, this review of research methodology focuses on outcomes in the musculoskeletal field.This paper provides an overview of conceptual models, different types of outcomes and commonly assessed outcomes in orthopaedics as well as epidemiological and statistical aspects of outcomes determination, measurement and interpretation.Clinicians should determine the outcome(s) most important to patients and/or public health in collaboration with the patients, epidemiologists/statisticians and other stakeholders.Key points in outcome choice are to evaluate both the benefit and harm of a health intervention, and to consider short- and longer-term outcomes including patient-reported outcomes.Outcome estimation should aim at identifying a clinically important difference (not the same as a statistically significant difference), at presenting measures of effects with confidence intervals and at taking the necessary steps to minimize bias. Cite this article: 2018;3 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170064.
由于改善患者病情是临床护理和研究的最终目标,因此本研究方法综述聚焦于肌肉骨骼领域的结果。本文概述了概念模型、不同类型的结果以及骨科中常用的评估结果,以及结果确定、测量和解释的流行病学和统计学方面。临床医生应与患者、流行病学家/统计学家及其他利益相关者合作,确定对患者和/或公共卫生最重要的结果。结果选择的关键点在于评估健康干预的益处和危害,并考虑短期和长期结果,包括患者报告的结果。结果估计应旨在确定临床上的重要差异(与统计学上的显著差异不同),以置信区间呈现效应测量值,并采取必要措施尽量减少偏差。引用本文:2018;3 DOI:10.1302/2058-5241.3.170064 。