Department of Radiology, Ospedale P. Pederzoli, Via Monte Baldo, 24, 37019, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Department of Oncology, Ospedale P. Pederzoli, Via Monte Baldo, 24, 37019, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jan;44(1):131-139. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1684-z.
IVIM-DW imaging has shown potential usefulness in the study of pancreatic lesions. Controversial results are available regarding the reliability of the measurements of IVIM-derived parameters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and the diagnostic potential of IVIM-derived parameters in differentiation among focal solid pancreatic lesions and normal pancreas (NP).
Fifty-seven patients (34 carcinomas-PDACs, 18 neuroendocrine neoplasms-panNENs, and 5 autoimmune pancreatitis-AIP) and 50 subjects with NP underwent 1.5-T MR imaging including IVIM-DWI. Images were analyzed by two independent readers. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), slow component of diffusion (D), incoherent microcirculation (Dp), and perfusion fraction (f) were calculated. Interobserver reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A Kruskal-Wallis H test with Steel-Dwass post hoc test was used for comparison. The diagnostic performance of each parameter was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Overall interobserver agreement was excellent (ICC = 0.860, 0.937, 0.968, and 0.983 for ADC, D, Dp, and f). D, Dp, and f significantly differed among PDACs and panNENs (p = 0.002, < 0.001, and < 0.001), albeit without significant difference at the pairwise comparison of ROC curves (p = 0.08-0.74). Perfusion fraction was higher in AIP compared with PDACs (p = 0.024; AUC = 0.735). Dp and f were higher in panNENs compared with AIP (p = 0.029 and 0.023), without differences at ROC analysis (p = 0.07).
IVIM-derived parameters have excellent reliability and could help in differentiation among solid pancreatic lesions and NP.
IVIM-DW 成像在胰腺病变的研究中具有潜在的应用价值。关于 IVIM 衍生参数测量的可靠性存在争议。本研究旨在评估 IVIM 衍生参数在区分局灶性实性胰腺病变和正常胰腺(NP)中的可靠性和诊断潜力。
57 例患者(34 例胰腺导管腺癌-PDACs、18 例神经内分泌肿瘤-panNENs 和 5 例自身免疫性胰腺炎-AIP)和 50 例 NP 患者接受 1.5TMR 成像,包括 IVIM-DWI。由两名独立的读者进行图像分析。计算表观扩散系数(ADC)、扩散缓慢成分(D)、非相干微循环(Dp)和灌注分数(f)。采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估观察者间可靠性。采用 Kruskal-Wallis H 检验和 Steel-Dwass 事后检验进行比较。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估每个参数的诊断性能。
总体观察者间一致性良好(ADC、D、Dp 和 f 的 ICC 分别为 0.860、0.937、0.968 和 0.983)。PDACs 和 panNENs 之间 D、Dp 和 f 存在显著差异(p=0.002、<0.001 和<0.001),但 ROC 曲线两两比较无显著差异(p=0.08-0.74)。与 PDACs 相比,AIP 中 f 较高(p=0.024;AUC=0.735)。panNENs 中 Dp 和 f 高于 AIP(p=0.029 和 0.023),但 ROC 分析无差异(p=0.07)。
IVIM 衍生参数具有良好的可靠性,有助于区分实性胰腺病变和 NP。