Martin Nicole, Manoharan Karthick, Thomas James, Davies Ceri, Lumbers R Thomas
Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London, UK, NW1 2DA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 28;6(6):CD012721. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012721.pub2.
BACKGROUND: Beta-blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system improve survival and reduce morbidity in people with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. There is uncertainty whether these treatments are beneficial for people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and a comprehensive review of the evidence is required. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and two clinical trial registries on 25 July 2017 to identify eligible studies. Reference lists from primary studies and review articles were checked for additional studies. There were no language or date restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials with a parallel group design enrolling adult participants with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, defined by a left ventricular ejection fraction of greater than 40 percent. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data. The outcomes assessed included cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalisation, hyperkalaemia, all-cause mortality and quality of life. Risk ratios (RR) and, where possible, hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. For continuous data, mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) were calculated. We contacted trialists where neccessary to obtain missing data. MAIN RESULTS: 37 randomised controlled trials (207 reports) were included across all comparisons with a total of 18,311 participants.Ten studies (3087 participants) investigating beta-blockers (BB) were included. A pooled analysis indicated a reduction in cardiovascular mortality (15% of participants in the intervention arm versus 19% in the control arm; RR 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.99; number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 25; 1046 participants; 3 studies). However, the quality of evidence was low and no effect on cardiovascular mortality was observed when the analysis was limited to studies with a low risk of bias (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.50 to 1.29; 643 participants; 1 study). There was no effect on all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalisation or quality of life measures, however there is uncertainty about these effects given the limited evidence available.12 studies (4408 participants) investigating mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) were included with the quality of evidence assessed as moderate. MRA treatment reduced heart failure hospitalisation (11% of participants in the intervention arm versus 14% in the control arm; RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.98; NNTB 41; 3714 participants; 3 studies; moderate-quality evidence) however, little or no effect on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and quality of life measures was observed. MRA treatment was associated with a greater risk of hyperkalaemia (16% of participants in the intervention group versus 8% in the control group; RR 2.11; 95% CI 1.77 to 2.51; 4291 participants; 6 studies; high-quality evidence).Eight studies (2061 participants) investigating angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) were included with the overall quality of evidence assessed as moderate. The evidence suggested that ACEI treatment likely has little or no effect on cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalisation, or quality of life. Data for the effect of ACEI on hyperkalaemia were only available from one of the included studies.Eight studies (8755 participants) investigating angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) were included with the overall quality of evidence assessed as high. The evidence suggested that treatment with ARB has little or no effect on cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalisation, or quality of life. ARB was associated with an increased risk of hyperkalaemia (0.9% of participants in the intervention group versus 0.5% in the control group; RR 1.88; 95% CI 1.07 to 3.33; 7148 participants; 2 studies; high-quality evidence).We identified a single ongoing placebo-controlled study investigating the effect of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) in people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that MRA treatment reduces heart failure hospitalisation in heart failure with preserverd ejection fraction, however the effects on mortality related outcomes and quality of life remain unclear. The available evidence for beta-blockers, ACEI, ARB and ARNI is limited and it remains uncertain whether these treatments have a role in the treatment of HFpEF in the absence of an alternative indication for their use. This comprehensive review highlights a persistent gap in the evidence that is currently being addressed through several large ongoing clinical trials.
背景:β受体阻滞剂和肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂可提高左心室射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的生存率并降低发病率。对于射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者,这些治疗是否有益尚不确定,因此需要对证据进行全面回顾。 目的:评估β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂和盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂对射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的影响。 检索方法:我们于2017年7月25日检索了Cochrane中心对照试验注册库(CENTRAL)、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)和两个临床试验注册库,以识别符合条件的研究。我们还检查了原始研究和综述文章的参考文献列表,以寻找其他研究。检索没有语言或日期限制。 入选标准:我们纳入了采用平行组设计的随机对照试验,试验对象为射血分数保留的成年心力衰竭患者,左心室射血分数大于40%定义为射血分数保留。 数据收集与分析:两名综述作者独立选择纳入研究并提取数据。评估的结局包括心血管死亡率、因心力衰竭住院、高钾血症、全因死亡率和生活质量。对于二分法结局,计算风险比(RR),并在可能的情况下计算风险比(HR)。对于连续数据,计算平均差(MD)或标准化平均差(SMD)。必要时,我们联系试验研究者以获取缺失数据。 主要结果:所有比较共纳入37项随机对照试验(207篇报告),共有18311名参与者。纳入了10项研究(3087名参与者),调查β受体阻滞剂(BB)。汇总分析表明,心血管死亡率有所降低(干预组15%的参与者,对照组19%;RR 0.78;95%置信区间(CI)0.62至0.99;受益所需治疗人数(NNTB)25;1046名参与者;3项研究)。然而,证据质量较低,当分析仅限于偏倚风险较低的研究时,未观察到对心血管死亡率的影响(RR 0.81;95%CI 0.50至1.29;643名参与者;1项研究)。对全因死亡率、因心力衰竭住院或生活质量指标没有影响,然而,鉴于现有证据有限,这些影响尚不确定。纳入了12项研究(4408名参与者),调查盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA),证据质量评估为中等。MRA治疗降低了因心力衰竭住院的发生率(干预组11%的参与者,对照组14%;RR 0.82;95%CI 0.69至0.98;NNTB 41;3714名参与者;3项研究;中等质量证据),然而,未观察到对全因和心血管死亡率以及生活质量指标的影响很小或没有影响。MRA治疗与高钾血症风险增加相关(干预组16%的参与者,对照组8%;RR 2.11;95%CI 1.77至2.51;4291名参与者;6项研究;高质量证据)。纳入了8项研究(2061名参与者),调查血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI),总体证据质量评估为中等。证据表明,ACEI治疗可能对心血管死亡率、全因死亡率、因心力衰竭住院或生活质量影响很小或没有影响。ACEI对高钾血症影响的数据仅来自一项纳入研究。纳入了8项研究(8755名参与者),调查血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB),总体证据质量评估为高。证据表明,ARB治疗对心血管死亡率、全因死亡率、因心力衰竭住院或生活质量影响很小或没有影响。ARB与高钾血症风险增加相关(干预组0.9%的参与者,对照组0.5%;RR 1.88;95%CI 1.07至3.33;7148名参与者;2项研究;高质量证据)。我们确定了一项正在进行的安慰剂对照研究,调查血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNI)对射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的影响。 作者结论:有证据表明,MRA治疗可降低射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者因心力衰竭住院的发生率,然而,对死亡率相关结局和生活质量的影响仍不清楚。β受体阻滞剂、ACEI、ARB和ARNI的现有证据有限,在没有其他使用指征的情况下,这些治疗在射血分数保留的心力衰竭治疗中是否起作用仍不确定。这项全面综述突出了目前正在通过几项大型正在进行的临床试验解决的证据方面的持续差距。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-6-28
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-5-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-11-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-2-3
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-3-13
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-11-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-1-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-10-24
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007-1-24
Heart Fail Rev. 2025-5-22
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025-3-24
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023-7-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-5-22
N Engl J Med. 2017-4-27