Moses Alan, Bjerrum Jesper, Hach Morten, Wæhrens Lars Holm, Toft Anders Dyhr
1 Novo Nordisk Inc, Plainsboro Township, NJ, USA.
2 Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsværd, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Jan;13(1):55-59. doi: 10.1177/1932296818783783. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
The article by Carter and Heinemann raised serious concerns about the concentrations of insulin in vials being sold in US pharmacies. To study the claims made in the manuscript, we reviewed Novo Nordisk data on insulin concentration.
Insulin concentrations within vials from three different sources along the distribution chain were evaluated utilizing currently accepted US Pharmacopeia methodology: (1) insulin content and stability based on production batches covering 7 years of insulin production, (2) insulin content in samples returned to Novo Nordisk over the last three years in the United States, and (3) data from eight years of independent EMA testing.
The data demonstrated that without exception (1) insulin quality based on stability data was maintained, even in scenarios that stressed the normal recommendations for temperature storage conditions, (2) insulin content from the last three years of samples returned to Novo Nordisk from patients in the United States (233 vials) was within USP requirements recognized by FDA, and (3) ten years of independent EMA sampling of products obtained at wholesalers and pharmacies across the EU confirmed compliance (n = 43).
The study by Carter and Heinemann utilized an LC-MS technique, which has not been validated for the quantification of insulin in pharmaceutical preparations. It appears likely that their findings are the result of the method utilized and not due to decreased insulin content in samples. However, recognizing the importance of maintaining Insulin content from production to the patient, Novo Nordisk supports continued evaluation of insulin distributed to pharmacies and patients utilizing validated techniques compliant with international pharmacopeias.
卡特和海涅曼的文章引发了人们对美国药店所售药瓶中胰岛素浓度的严重担忧。为研究该手稿中的说法,我们查阅了诺和诺德公司关于胰岛素浓度的数据。
利用目前美国药典认可的方法,对分销链中三个不同来源药瓶内的胰岛素浓度进行了评估:(1)基于涵盖7年胰岛素生产的生产批次的胰岛素含量和稳定性;(2)过去三年美国返还给诺和诺德公司的样本中的胰岛素含量;(3)来自欧洲药品管理局(EMA)八年独立检测的数据。
数据表明,无一例外:(1)即使在超出正常温度储存条件建议的情况下,基于稳定性数据的胰岛素质量仍得以维持;(2)过去三年从美国患者返还给诺和诺德公司的样本(233个药瓶)中的胰岛素含量符合美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)认可的美国药典要求;(3)对在欧盟各地批发商和药店获取的产品进行的十年EMA独立抽样证实符合要求(n = 43)。
卡特和海涅曼的研究采用了液相色谱 - 质谱(LC - MS)技术,该技术尚未经过验证用于定量药物制剂中的胰岛素。他们的研究结果似乎是所采用方法的结果,而非样本中胰岛素含量降低所致。然而,认识到从生产到患者维持胰岛素含量的重要性,诺和诺德公司支持继续使用符合国际药典的经过验证的技术对分发给药店和患者的胰岛素进行评估。