Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Feb 1;14(2):149-155. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0256. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
This study examined the partial reconstitution of the work capacity above critical power (W') following successive bouts of maximal exercise using a new repeated ramp test, against which the fit of an existing W' balance ( ) prediction model was tested.
Twenty active adults, consisting of trained cyclists (n = 9; age 43 [15] y, 61.9 [8.5] mL·kg·min) and untrained cyclists (n = 11; age 36 [15] y, 52.4 [5.8] mL·kg·min) performed 2 tests 2 to 4 d apart, consisting of 3 incremental ramps (20 W·min) to exhaustion interspersed with 2-min recoveries.
Intratrial differences between recoveries demonstrated significant reductions in the amount of W' reconstituted for the group and both subsets (P < .05). The observed minimal detectable changes of 475 J (first recovery) and 368 J (second recovery) can be used to monitor changes in the rate of W' reconstitution in individual trained cyclists. Intertrial relative reliability of W' reconstitution was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients for the group (≥.859) and the trained (≥.940) and untrained (≥.768) subsets. Absolute reliability was evaluated with typical error (TE) and coefficient of variation (CV) for the group (TE ≤ 559 J, CV ≤ 9.2%), trained (TE ≤ 301 J, CV ≤ 4.7%), and untrained (TE ≤ 720 J, CV ≤ 12.4%).
The reconstitution of W' is subject to a fatiguing effect hitherto unaccounted for in prediction models. Furthermore, the model did not provide a good fit for the repeated ramp test, which itself proved to be a reliable test protocol.
本研究使用新的重复斜坡测试,检查了在连续最大运动后,超过临界功率(W')的部分工作能力的部分重建,并对现有的 W'平衡( )预测模型的拟合进行了测试。
20 名活跃的成年人,包括训练有素的自行车运动员(n = 9;年龄 43 [15]岁, 61.9 [8.5]mL·kg·min)和未经训练的自行车运动员(n = 11;年龄 36 [15]岁, 52.4 [5.8]mL·kg·min),在 2 到 4 天内进行了 2 项测试,每项测试都包括 3 次递增斜坡(20 W·min)至衰竭,中间穿插 2 分钟的恢复期。
恢复期内的组内差异表明,组内和两个亚组的 W'重建量均显著减少(P <.05)。观察到的最小可检测变化量为 475 J(第一次恢复)和 368 J(第二次恢复),可用于监测个体训练有素的自行车运动员 W'重建率的变化。W'重建的组内相对可靠性通过组内(≥.859)、训练有素(≥.940)和未经训练(≥.768)亚组的组内相关系数进行评估。绝对可靠性通过组内的典型误差(TE)和变异系数(CV)(TE ≤ 559 J,CV ≤ 9.2%)、训练有素(TE ≤ 301 J,CV ≤ 4.7%)和未经训练(TE ≤ 720 J,CV ≤ 12.4%)进行评估。
W'的重建受到迄今为止尚未在预测模型中考虑到的疲劳效应的影响。此外, 模型对重复斜坡测试的拟合效果不佳,而重复斜坡测试本身被证明是一种可靠的测试方案。