• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Effect of FDA Drug Safety Communications on Patterns of Tiotropium Dispensing: A U.S. Health Plan Claims Database Study.FDA 药物安全通讯对噻托溴铵配药模式的影响:一项美国健康计划理赔数据库研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jul;24(7):700-709. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.7.700.
2
Long-Acting Bronchodilator Initiation in COPD and the Risk of Adverse Cardiopulmonary Events: A Population-Based Comparative Safety Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病中长效支气管扩张剂的起始使用与不良心肺事件风险:一项基于人群的比较安全性研究。
Chest. 2017 Jan;151(1):60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
3
Effectiveness and Safety of COPD Maintenance Therapy with Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus LABA/ICS in a US Claims Database.噻托溴铵/奥达特罗与 LABA/ICS 在一项美国理赔数据库中用于 COPD 维持治疗的疗效和安全性。
Adv Ther. 2021 May;38(5):2249-2270. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01646-5. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
4
Differences in Real-World Health and Economic Outcomes Among Patients with COPD Treated with Combination Tiotropium/Olodaterol Versus Triple Therapy.COPD 患者接受噻托溴铵/奥达特罗联合治疗与三联疗法治疗的真实世界健康和经济结局差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Oct;26(10):1363-1374. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.20159. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
5
Risk Assessment of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Stroke Associated with Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists, Alone or in Combination, versus Long-Acting beta2-Agonists.长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂、长效β2-激动剂单独或联合应用与急性心肌梗死和卒中风险评估。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Aug 2;17:1715-1733. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S363997. eCollection 2022.
6
Long-term general and cardiovascular safety of tiotropium/olodaterol in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.噻托溴铵/奥达特罗在中度至极重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的长期总体安全性及心血管安全性
Respir Med. 2017 Jan;122:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
7
One-year mortality associated with COPD treatment: a comparison of tiotropium and long-acting beta2-agonists in three Italian regions: results from the OUTPUL study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)治疗相关的一年期死亡率:在意大利三个地区对噻托溴铵与长效β2受体激动剂的比较:OUTPUL研究结果
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 May;25(5):578-89. doi: 10.1002/pds.3961. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
8
Risk of Severe Cardiovascular Events From Add-On Tiotropium in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.加用噻托溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的严重心血管事件风险。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Oct;93(10):1462-1473. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
9
The impact of FDA regulatory activities on incident dispensing of LABA-containing medication: 2005-2011.美国食品药品监督管理局监管活动对含长效β2受体激动剂药物的事件配药的影响:2005 - 2011年
J Asthma. 2018 Aug;55(8):907-914. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1378355. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
10
Tiotropium and olodaterol in the prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (DYNAGITO): a double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, active-controlled trial.噻托溴铵和奥达特罗预防慢性阻塞性肺疾病恶化(DYNAGITO):一项双盲、随机、平行分组、阳性对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 May;6(5):337-344. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30102-4. Epub 2018 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and blood transfusions: cancer management under Medicare's reimbursement policy.种族/民族和性别在促红细胞生成素刺激剂和输血使用方面的差异:医疗保险报销政策下的癌症管理。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Nov;26(11):1477-1486. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.11.1477.

本文引用的文献

1
The US Food and Drug Administration's drug safety recommendations and long-acting beta2-agonist dispensing pattern changes in adult asthma patients: 2003-2012.美国食品药品监督管理局针对成年哮喘患者的药物安全建议及长效β2受体激动剂配药模式变化:2003 - 2012年
J Asthma Allergy. 2017 Mar 16;10:67-74. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S124395. eCollection 2017.
2
Treatment patterns of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in employed adults in the United States.美国在职成年人慢性阻塞性肺疾病的治疗模式
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Feb 24;10:415-22. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S75034. eCollection 2015.
3
Use of interrupted time series analysis in evaluating health care quality improvements.使用中断时间序列分析评估医疗质量改进
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.08.002.
4
Tiotropium Respimat inhaler and the risk of death in COPD.噻托溴铵 Respimat 吸入器与 COPD 患者的死亡风险。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 17;369(16):1491-501. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303342. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
5
A critical review of methods to evaluate the impact of FDA regulatory actions.FDA 监管措施影响评估方法的批判性回顾。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Sep;22(9):986-94. doi: 10.1002/pds.3480. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
6
Impact of FDA drug risk communications on health care utilization and health behaviors: a systematic review.FDA 药物风险沟通对医疗利用和健康行为的影响:系统评价。
Med Care. 2012 Jun;50(6):466-78. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318245a160.
7
Balancing transparency and uncertainty.
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jan 9;172(1):74-5. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.546. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
8
Tiotropium bromide step-up therapy for adults with uncontrolled asthma.噻托溴铵阶梯治疗成人未控制哮喘。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 28;363(18):1715-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008770. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
9
The safety of tiotropium--the FDA's conclusions.噻托溴铵的安全性——美国食品药品监督管理局的结论
N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1097-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1008502. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
10
Differences in physicians' self-reported knowledge of, attitudes toward, and responses to the black box warning on long-acting beta-agonists.医生在自我报告的关于长效β受体激动剂黑框警告的知识、态度及应对方面的差异。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009 Oct;103(4):304-10. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60529-7.

FDA 药物安全通讯对噻托溴铵配药模式的影响:一项美国健康计划理赔数据库研究。

The Effect of FDA Drug Safety Communications on Patterns of Tiotropium Dispensing: A U.S. Health Plan Claims Database Study.

机构信息

1 Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.

2 Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jul;24(7):700-709. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.7.700.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.7.700
PMID:29952703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10398184/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The FDA issued 2 main drug safety communications (DSCs) on the cardiovascular safety of tiotropium in March 2008 (warning of a potential increased stroke risk) and January 2010 (informing of an absence of a significant increased stroke risk or cardiovascular events based on findings from a large trial).

OBJECTIVE

To describe the effect of the FDA DSCs on medication dispensing of tiotropium in a large U.S. claims database.

METHODS

Initiation of tiotropium products among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) aged 40 years and older was determined monthly from 2006-2012 using medication dispensing from the IMS Lifelink Health Plan Claims Database. Similarly, monthly initiation of products containing long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) was calculated to explore product switching. The effect of the 2008 and 2010 FDA DSCs was measured using interrupted time-series analysis. Subgroups of patients with greater cardiovascular risk were also examined.

RESULTS

A decreasing trend in initiation of tiotropium-containing products was present before the initial 2008 DSC. The decline in tiotropium initiation continued until January 2010, accompanied by an increased initiation of LABA-containing products in patients with COPD. In the presence of the existing decreasing trend, the initial DSC was followed by an immediate 2.8% (P = 0.02) further reduction in tiotropium initiation. Tiotropium initiation increased 2.5% (P = 0.03) immediately after the 2010 DSC, reducing the overall decline in rate and stabilizing (flattening) the trend. No significant changes in dispensing level or trend were observed among COPD patients with cardiovascular comorbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiovascular safety concerns may have affected tiotropium initiation as indicated by the decrease in tiotropium dispensing shown immediately following the initial DSC. The effect was alleviated as concerns lessened following the most recent DSC.

DISCLOSURES

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors are employed by the FDA and have no conflict of interest relevant to the content of this study. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the FDA.

摘要

背景

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)于 2008 年 3 月(警告潜在的卒中风险增加)和 2010 年 1 月(告知大型试验中未发现卒中风险或心血管事件显著增加)发布了 2 份关于噻托溴铵心血管安全性的主要药物安全性通信(DSC)。

目的

描述 FDA DSC 对大型美国索赔数据库中噻托溴铵药物配给的影响。

方法

使用 IMS Lifelink 健康计划索赔数据库中的药物配给,每月确定 40 岁及以上慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者噻托溴铵产品的起始使用情况。同样,计算含有长效β-激动剂(LABA)的产品的每月起始使用情况,以探索产品转换。使用中断时间序列分析测量 2008 年和 2010 年 FDA DSC 的效果。还检查了具有更高心血管风险的患者亚组。

结果

在最初的 2008 年 DSC 之前,噻托溴铵产品的起始使用呈下降趋势。在 2010 年 1 月之前,随着 COPD 患者中含有 LABA 的产品的起始使用增加,噻托溴铵的起始使用持续下降。在存在现有下降趋势的情况下,初始 DSC 之后立即出现 2.8%(P=0.02)的噻托溴铵起始进一步减少。2010 年 DSC 后,噻托溴铵的起始增加了 2.5%(P=0.03),从而降低了总体下降速度并稳定(变平)了趋势。在患有心血管合并症的 COPD 患者中,未观察到配给水平或趋势的显著变化。

结论

心血管安全性问题可能影响了噻托溴铵的起始使用,这表明在初始 DSC 后,噻托溴铵的配给量立即减少。随着最近一次 DSC 后担忧减轻,效果得到缓解。

披露

本研究未从公共、商业或非营利部门的任何特定资助机构获得任何资金。作者受雇于 FDA,与本研究内容无利益冲突。本文所表达的观点不一定代表 FDA 的观点。