Liu Zheng, Yu Xiao, Hu Jia, Li Fan, Wang Shaogang
Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(26):e11043. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011043.
The traditional surgical approach for removing a symptomatic urachal remnant is via a lower midline laparotomy and infraumbilical incision or a laparoscopic approach with umbilicoplasty. We reviewed our experience with umbilicus-sparing laparoscopic urachal remnant excision in a single-center study and evaluated its efficacy versus open approach (OA). This study was a retrospective study. Between March 2012 and September 2016, 32 consecutive patients with symptomatic urachal remnants underwent the umbilicus-sparing laparoscopic approach (USLA) (n = 17) or OA (n = 15). The efficacy, recovery, and long-term outcomes were reviewed. Our Results showed that the clinical characteristics of the patients in each group, such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and disease type, had no significant differences (P > .05). No significant difference was found in the surgical procedure times (76.1 ± 15.4 vs 69.2 ± 13.9 minutes, P = .189) and intraoperative blood loss (29.4 ± 13.3 vs 32.2 ± 12.9 mL, P = .543) between the USLA groups and OA groups. However, the mean postoperative hospital stay (patients with bladder cuff excision: 4.1 ± 1.8 vs 6.1 ± 1.4 days, P = .040 and patients without bladder cuff excision: 1.8 ± 0.5 vs 3.6 ± 0.8 days, P < .001) and the time of full recovery (11.2 ± 1.9 vs 15.6 ± 3.1 days, P < .001), the USLA group were both significantly shorter than that of the OA group. No infected recurrence and malignant transformation had occurred at a mean follow-up of 32.4 ± 8.1 and 34.1 ± 8.8 months in USLA group and OA group, respectively. In conclusion, to minimize the morbidity of radical excision, umbilicus-sparing management of benign urachal remnants in adults is a safe and efficacious alternative with superior cosmetic outcomes, postoperative recovery compared with an OA or umbilicoplasty.
对于有症状的脐尿管残余物,传统的手术方法是经下腹部正中剖腹术和脐下切口,或采用脐成形术的腹腔镜手术方法。我们在一项单中心研究中回顾了保留脐部的腹腔镜脐尿管残余物切除术的经验,并评估了其与开放手术(OA)相比的疗效。本研究为回顾性研究。2012年3月至2016年9月期间,32例连续的有症状脐尿管残余物患者接受了保留脐部的腹腔镜手术方法(USLA)(n = 17)或开放手术(n = 15)。对疗效、恢复情况和长期结果进行了回顾。我们的结果显示,每组患者的临床特征,如年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)和疾病类型,均无显著差异(P >.05)。USLA组和OA组在手术时间(76.1±15.4 vs 69.2±13.9分钟,P =.189)和术中出血量(29.4±13.3 vs 32.2±12.9 mL,P =.543)方面未发现显著差异。然而,术后平均住院时间(膀胱袖状切除术患者:4.1±1.8 vs 6.1±1.4天,P =.040;未行膀胱袖状切除术患者:1.8±0.5 vs 3.6±0.8天,P <.001)和完全恢复时间(11.2±1.9 vs 15.6±3.1天,P <.001),USLA组均明显短于OA组。USLA组和OA组在平均随访32.4±8.1个月和34.1±8.8个月时,均未发生感染复发和恶变。总之,为了将根治性切除的发病率降至最低,对于成人良性脐尿管残余物的保留脐部处理是一种安全有效的替代方法,与开放手术或脐成形术相比,具有更好的美容效果和术后恢复情况。