• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔内联合静脉新辅助化疗在老年晚期卵巢癌伴大量腹水患者中的应用

Application of combined intraperitoneal and intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy in senile patients with advanced ovarian cancer and massive ascites.

作者信息

Liu E L, Mi R R, Wang D H, Wang L Q, Zhang Y M, Chen W M

出版信息

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2017;38(2):209-213.

PMID:29953782
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in senile patients with advanced ovarian can- cer and ascites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred eight senile patients with advanced ovarian cancer and ascites were randomly di- vided into two groups: experimental and control groups. Patients in the experimental group were treated with two courses of intraperitoneal combined with intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by cytoreductive surgery, and six courses of intravenous chemotherapy, while the patients in the control group only received cytoreductive surgery and six to eight courses of intravenous chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The operation duration, blood loss, ideal success rate of cytoreductive surgery, and prognosis of the two groups were then compared. Thirty-eight patients in the experimental group successfully received cytoreductive surgery, accounting for 74.14%, while only 23 patients in the control group received cytoreductive surgery successfully, accounting for 46%, showing signifinificantly less than those in the control group (p < 0.001). However, the median survival and the median progression-free survival showed no statistical difference between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can obviously shorten the operation duration, reduce the intraoperative blood loss, and improve the ideal success rate of cytoreductive surgery, but does not obviously improve the prognosis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨新辅助化疗对老年晚期卵巢癌伴腹水患者的影响。

材料与方法

108例老年晚期卵巢癌伴腹水患者随机分为两组:试验组和对照组。试验组患者接受两疗程腹腔联合静脉新辅助化疗,随后进行肿瘤细胞减灭术,以及六疗程静脉化疗,而对照组患者仅接受肿瘤细胞减灭术和六至八疗程静脉化疗。

结果

然后比较两组的手术时间、失血量、肿瘤细胞减灭术的理想成功率和预后。试验组38例患者成功接受肿瘤细胞减灭术,占74.14%,而对照组仅23例患者成功接受肿瘤细胞减灭术,占46%,明显低于试验组(p<0.001)。然而,两组的中位生存期和中位无进展生存期无统计学差异(p>0.05)。

结论

新辅助化疗可明显缩短手术时间,减少术中失血量,提高肿瘤细胞减灭术的理想成功率,但对预后改善不明显。

相似文献

1
Application of combined intraperitoneal and intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy in senile patients with advanced ovarian cancer and massive ascites.腹腔内联合静脉新辅助化疗在老年晚期卵巢癌伴大量腹水患者中的应用
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2017;38(2):209-213.
2
Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cytoreductive surgery improve survival rates in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer compared with cytoreductive surgery alone?与单纯减瘤手术相比,新辅助化疗加减瘤手术能否提高晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者的生存率?
J BUON. 2015 May-Jun;20(3):847-54.
3
Hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with primary or secondary cytoreductive surgery in the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.原发性或继发性肿瘤细胞减灭术联合术中腹腔内热灌注化疗(HIPEC)治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌。
Minerva Ginecol. 2017 Apr;69(2):119-127. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.16.03959-9. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
4
Survival outcomes after extensive cytoreductive surgery and selective neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to institutional criteria in bulky stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer.根据机构标准,对晚期IIIC期和IV期上皮性卵巢癌进行广泛细胞减灭术和选择性新辅助化疗后的生存结果。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Jul;28(4):e48. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e48.
5
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Increases R0 Cytoreduction Rate But Does Not Improve Final Outcome in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.新辅助化疗可提高晚期上皮性卵巢癌的R0细胞减灭率,但不能改善最终结局。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 May;24(5):1330-1335. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5704-3. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
6
Neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy and embolization in treatment of advanced ovarian epithelial carcinoma.新辅助动脉内化疗及栓塞术治疗晚期卵巢上皮癌
Chin Med J (Engl). 2004 Oct;117(10):1547-51.
7
Primary debulking surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.初次肿瘤细胞减灭术与新辅助化疗后间隔肿瘤细胞减灭术治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Jan;293(1):163-168. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3813-z. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
8
Results of a multicenter phase I dose-finding trial of hyperthermic intraperitoneal cisplatin after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and complete cytoreductive surgery and followed by maintenance bevacizumab in initially unresectable ovarian cancer.新辅助化疗及完全肿瘤细胞减灭术后腹腔内热灌注顺铂并序贯贝伐单抗维持治疗初治不可切除卵巢癌的多中心Ⅰ期剂量探索性试验结果
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Aug;142(2):237-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.05.032. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
9
[Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of patients with stage IIIc and IV epithelial ovarian cancer].新辅助化疗对Ⅲc期和Ⅳ期上皮性卵巢癌患者生存的影响
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2008 Apr;30(4):298-301.
10
Intraperitoneal chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and optimal interval tumor reductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer.新辅助化疗后腹腔化疗联合最佳间隔肿瘤减灭术治疗晚期卵巢癌。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Mar;156(3):530-534. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.016. Epub 2020 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and chemotherapy response score as prognostic markers in ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及化疗反应评分作为新辅助化疗治疗卵巢癌患者的预后标志物。
J Ovarian Res. 2021 Nov 1;14(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13048-021-00902-0.
2
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.新辅助化疗在手术前与手术后化疗用于晚期卵巢上皮癌的初始治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 30;7(7):CD005343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub6.
3
Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.
晚期卵巢上皮癌初始治疗中化疗与手术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 5;2(2):CD005343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub5.
4
Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.晚期卵巢上皮癌初始治疗中化疗与手术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 31;2019(10):CD005343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub4.