• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未能对不当行为提出关注是否违反诚信原则?研究人员对举报不当行为的反思。

Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers' reflections on reporting misconduct.

机构信息

a Institute for Biomedical Ethics , University of Basel , Basel , Switzerland.

出版信息

Account Res. 2018;25(6):311-339. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1493577. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1080/08989621.2018.1493577
PMID:29954230
Abstract

This article describes and discusses the views of researchers on the significance of raising concerns about scientific misconduct in their work environment and the reasons or circumstances that might deter them from doing so. In this exploratory qualitative research study, we conducted in-depth interviews with 33 researchers working in life sciences and medicine. They represent three seniority levels and five universities across Switzerland. A large majority of respondents in this research study argued that failure to raise concerns about scientific misconduct compromises research integrity. This is an encouraging result demonstrating that researchers try to adhere to high ethical standards. However, further interaction with respondents highlighted that this correct ethical assessment does not lead researchers to take the consequent action of raising concerns. The factors that discourage researchers from raising concerns need to be addressed at the level of research groups, institutions, and by setting a positive precedent which helps them to believe in the system's ability to investigate concerns raised in a timely and professional manner. Training of researchers in research integrity related issues will have limited utility unless it is coupled with the creation of research culture where raising concerns is a standard practice of scientific and research activities.

摘要

本文描述并讨论了研究人员对在工作环境中关注科学不端行为的重要性的看法,以及可能阻止他们这样做的原因或情况。在这项探索性的定性研究中,我们对来自瑞士不同地区的 33 名生命科学和医学领域的研究人员进行了深入访谈。他们代表了三个资历层次和五所大学。在这项研究中,绝大多数受访者认为,对科学不端行为的担忧的忽视会损害研究的完整性。这是一个令人鼓舞的结果,表明研究人员努力遵守高标准的道德规范。然而,与受访者的进一步互动表明,这种正确的道德评估并没有促使研究人员采取提出担忧的相应行动。阻碍研究人员提出担忧的因素需要在研究小组、机构一级加以解决,并树立一个积极的榜样,让他们相信该系统有能力及时、专业地调查提出的担忧。除非与培养一种关注提出担忧是科学和研究活动的标准做法的研究文化相结合,否则对研究人员进行与研究诚信相关问题的培训将收效甚微。

相似文献

1
Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers' reflections on reporting misconduct.未能对不当行为提出关注是否违反诚信原则?研究人员对举报不当行为的反思。
Account Res. 2018;25(6):311-339. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1493577. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
2
How do researchers acquire and develop notions of research integrity? A qualitative study among biomedical researchers in Switzerland.研究人员如何获得和发展研究诚信观念?瑞士生物医学研究人员的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 16;20(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0410-x.
3
Researchers' interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study.研究者对研究诚信的理解:一项定性研究。
Account Res. 2018;25(2):79-93. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1413940. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
4
In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities.从马来西亚大学研究人员的角度看科研不端行为
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Dec;24(6):1755-1776. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9997-9. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
5
How should researchers cope with the ethical demands of discovering research misconduct? Going beyond reporting and whistleblowing.研究人员应如何应对发现研究不端行为的伦理要求?超越举报和举报。
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2020 Aug 6;16(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40504-020-00102-6.
6
Whistle blowing and research integrity: Potential remedy for research misconduct in Malaysian institutions of higher education. whistle blowing 与研究诚信:马来西亚高等教育机构内科研不端行为的潜在补救措施。
Account Res. 2019 Jan;26(1):17-32. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1554444. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
7
Differing Perceptions Concerning Research Integrity Between Universities and Industry: A Qualitative Study.高校与产业界对研究诚信的认知差异:一项定性研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Oct;24(5):1421-1436. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9965-4. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
8
On the Willingness to Report and the Consequences of Reporting Research Misconduct: The Role of Power Relations.关于报告研究不端行为的意愿和后果:权力关系的作用。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1595-1623. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00202-8. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
9
Evaluating U.S. medical schools' efforts to educate faculty researchers on research integrity and research misconduct policies and procedures.评估美国医学院校在教育教师研究员了解研究诚信和研究不端行为政策和程序方面的努力。
Account Res. 2014;21(1):9-25. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.822264.
10
Researchers experience of misconduct in research in Malaysian higher education institutions.马来西亚高等教育机构中研究不端行为的研究人员的经历。
Account Res. 2018;25(3):125-141. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1429925. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture.关于何为良好研究文化的范围综述。
F1000Res. 2024 Oct 14;13:324. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.147599.1. eCollection 2024.
2
Snitches Get Stitches and End Up in Ditches: A Systematic Review of the Factors Associated With Whistleblowing Intentions.告密者会受伤并最终陷入困境:对与举报意图相关因素的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 5;12:631538. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631538. eCollection 2021.
3
Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study.
利益相关者对研究诚信培训实践的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 May 28;22(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00637-z.
4
How should researchers cope with the ethical demands of discovering research misconduct? Going beyond reporting and whistleblowing.研究人员应如何应对发现研究不端行为的伦理要求?超越举报和举报。
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2020 Aug 6;16(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40504-020-00102-6.
5
How do researchers acquire and develop notions of research integrity? A qualitative study among biomedical researchers in Switzerland.研究人员如何获得和发展研究诚信观念?瑞士生物医学研究人员的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 16;20(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0410-x.