Ovadia Robert, Streubel Alexander, Webb-Vargas Yenny, Ulland Lea, Luemkemann Joerg, Rauch Kamila, Eder Juergen, Lam Philippe, Tegoulia Vassia, Maa Yuh-Fun
Pharmaceutical Processing and Technology Development, Genentech, CA, USA.
Pharmaceutical Development & Supplies, Technical Development Biologics Europe, Basel, Switzerland.
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2019 Jan-Feb;73(1):2-15. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2018.008797. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
Capping completes the closure of parenteral drug products in the final packaging container and is critical in maintaining an integral seal to ensure product quality. Residual seal force (RSF) is considered the sole quantifiable attribute for measuring seal "goodness" and potentially enables nonsubjective, consistent setting of cappers across manufacturing sites. However, the consistency and reliability of RSF measurement and data have been scarcely reported, and the relationship between RSF and container closure integrity (CCI) remains poorly understood.Here, we present a large data set generated from a commercial capper and the results from a laboratory capper of glass vials and rubber stoppers with aluminum caps. All RSF values exhibited significant variability. We evaluated four potential sources of variability: the capper, the RSF tester, the time-dependent nature of RSF, and the components. We determined that the capper, the tester, and the time-dependent nature are not main sources. Dimensional tolerances of the packaging components were the root cause for the container closure system (CCS) configurations tested in this study.This study correlated RSF with CCI (via helium leakage), although CCI is not sensitive to RSF; CCI was maintained even for loosely capped vials with no measurable RSF. This was attributed to the stopper's two sealing surfaces: the valve seal and the land seal. A methodology capable of differentiating the two seals' functions demonstrated that vials with only the valve seal always passed leakage testing for a selected CCS configuration in this study, while vials with only the land seal failed CCI at low RSF values. This observation allows proposal of a low RSF limit that is safe even when the valve seal is defective. Simplified statistical analysis of commercial capping data, with the input of sample size, allowed the relationship between RSF's low limit and an allowable failing rate to be established. Overall, despite the inherent variability of RSF, this study shows that it is a feasible parameter for capping process quantification and demonstrates the potential of RSF measurement in capper setup. Pharmaceutical vials are typically closed off with an elastomeric stopper that is secured onto the vial with an aluminum crimp cap (or seal) such that the entire assembly is meant to protect the vial's contents from external contamination. Therefore, the capping process is critical for ensuring container closure integrity. Characterizing the effectiveness of a seal in a nonsubjective and quantifiable manner is challenging. In this communication, we report the evaluation of residual seal force measurements (the compression force that the crimp cap exerts on the stopper) to evaluate capping for a large set of samples generated on both an at-scale commercial capper and a benchtop laboratory capper. We propose a test methodology, based on a statistical approach, for establishing permissible lower residual force limits that would provide a high degree of confidence to the capping process. This is a useful tool for consistent capper setup and capping process quantification.
封盖完成了注射用药品在最终包装容器中的封闭,对于维持完整密封以确保产品质量至关重要。残余密封力(RSF)被认为是衡量密封“质量”的唯一可量化属性,并且有可能实现跨生产场地非主观、一致地设置封盖机。然而,关于RSF测量和数据的一致性及可靠性鲜有报道,并且RSF与容器密封完整性(CCI)之间的关系仍知之甚少。在此,我们展示了从一台商用封盖机生成的大量数据集以及一台实验室封盖机对带有铝盖的玻璃小瓶和橡胶塞进行测试的结果。所有RSF值均表现出显著的变异性。我们评估了四个潜在的变异来源:封盖机、RSF测试仪、RSF的时间依赖性以及组件。我们确定封盖机、测试仪和时间依赖性并非主要来源。包装组件的尺寸公差是本研究中所测试的容器密封系统(CCS)配置的根本原因。本研究将RSF与CCI(通过氦气泄漏)相关联,尽管CCI对RSF不敏感;即使对于封盖松散且无可测量RSF的小瓶,CCI仍能保持。这归因于塞子的两个密封表面:阀密封和平面密封。一种能够区分这两种密封功能的方法表明,在本研究中,对于选定的CCS配置,仅具有阀密封的小瓶总是通过泄漏测试,而仅具有平面密封的小瓶在低RSF值时CCI测试失败。这一观察结果使得能够提出一个即使在阀密封有缺陷时也是安全的低RSF限值。通过对商业封盖数据进行简化的统计分析,并输入样本量,得以建立RSF下限与允许失败率之间的关系。总体而言,尽管RSF存在固有变异性,但本研究表明它是用于封盖过程量化的一个可行参数,并证明了RSF测量在封盖机设置中的潜力。药用小瓶通常用弹性塞封闭,并用铝压盖(或密封)固定在小瓶上,以使整个装置保护小瓶内的内容物免受外部污染。因此封盖过程对于确保容器密封完整性至关重要。以非主观且可量化的方式表征密封的有效性具有挑战性。在本通讯中,我们报告了对残余密封力测量值(压盖对塞子施加的压缩力)的评估,以评估在一台大规模商用封盖机和一台台式实验室封盖机上生成的大量样品的封盖情况。我们基于一种统计方法提出了一种测试方法,用于确定允许的较低残余力限值,这将为封盖过程提供高度的置信度。这是用于一致的封盖机设置和封盖过程量化的一个有用工具。